法律人格在人工智能中的延伸。

Q3 Social Sciences Revista de Bioetica y Derecho Pub Date : 2019-06-03 DOI:10.1344/RBD2019.0.27064
Pin Lean Lau
{"title":"法律人格在人工智能中的延伸。","authors":"Pin Lean Lau","doi":"10.1344/RBD2019.0.27064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to illuminate the main ethical, legal and social implications (ELSIs) concerning social humanoid robots that have their base in artificial intelligence (AI). The main dilemma highlighted touches upon the expansion of the concept of legal personhood, and the attribution of appropriate legal responses to govern the future proliferation of AI systems vis-a-vis social humanoid robots. The paper cautions on the need to carefully reflect on notions of personhood and human dignity for AI systems, balanced against the underlying representation of values and behaviors that may threaten to erode the human rights discourse. Additionally, it questions the wisdom of the broad expanse of the European legal response to the development and use of AI systems.","PeriodicalId":52269,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Bioetica y Derecho","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Extension of Legal Personhood in Artificial Intelligence.\",\"authors\":\"Pin Lean Lau\",\"doi\":\"10.1344/RBD2019.0.27064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this paper is to illuminate the main ethical, legal and social implications (ELSIs) concerning social humanoid robots that have their base in artificial intelligence (AI). The main dilemma highlighted touches upon the expansion of the concept of legal personhood, and the attribution of appropriate legal responses to govern the future proliferation of AI systems vis-a-vis social humanoid robots. The paper cautions on the need to carefully reflect on notions of personhood and human dignity for AI systems, balanced against the underlying representation of values and behaviors that may threaten to erode the human rights discourse. Additionally, it questions the wisdom of the broad expanse of the European legal response to the development and use of AI systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Bioetica y Derecho\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Bioetica y Derecho\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1344/RBD2019.0.27064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Bioetica y Derecho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1344/RBD2019.0.27064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文的目的是阐明以人工智能为基础的社交类人机器人的主要伦理、法律和社会含义。强调的主要困境涉及法人概念的扩展,以及适当的法律回应的归属,以管理人工智能系统相对于社交类人机器人的未来扩散。该论文警告说,有必要仔细反思人工智能系统的人格和人类尊严概念,与可能侵蚀人权话语的价值观和行为的潜在代表相平衡。此外,它还质疑欧洲对人工智能系统的开发和使用做出的广泛法律回应是否明智。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Extension of Legal Personhood in Artificial Intelligence.
The purpose of this paper is to illuminate the main ethical, legal and social implications (ELSIs) concerning social humanoid robots that have their base in artificial intelligence (AI). The main dilemma highlighted touches upon the expansion of the concept of legal personhood, and the attribution of appropriate legal responses to govern the future proliferation of AI systems vis-a-vis social humanoid robots. The paper cautions on the need to carefully reflect on notions of personhood and human dignity for AI systems, balanced against the underlying representation of values and behaviors that may threaten to erode the human rights discourse. Additionally, it questions the wisdom of the broad expanse of the European legal response to the development and use of AI systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de Bioetica y Derecho
Revista de Bioetica y Derecho Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Accreditation of research ethics committees in Paraguay: An ethical imperative. Una mirada bioética a la representación social de la discapacidad psicosocial Inteligencia artificial y administración de justicia: desafíos derivados del contexto latinoamericano Derechos y deberes de información: el rol de la atención primaria de salud en la implementación de la ley que despenaliza la interrupción voluntaria del embarazo en tres causales en Chile Bioética en contextos pluriculturales: problemas epistemológicos y su relación con los derechos humanos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1