英国约克主义的财政理论与实践:从“税收”到“领域”国家的回归

IF 0.4 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES Studia Historica-Historia Medieval Pub Date : 2022-12-21 DOI:10.14201/shhme20224021134
Alex Brayson
{"title":"英国约克主义的财政理论与实践:从“税收”到“领域”国家的回归","authors":"Alex Brayson","doi":"10.14201/shhme20224021134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work scrutinises the B. P. Wolffe’s influential argument that the Yorkist «land revenue experiment» transformed the English crown’s finances.  It pioneers quantitative estimates of the Yorkist royal budget which emphasise the limited net gains derived from the crown’s resumption of alienated lands.  This demonstrates that the notion of «living of the king’s own» which was central to the work of Sir John Fortescue does not afford a realistic blueprint for how a fifteenth-century government could manage its finances, but rather denotes an ideological, class-based, opposition to the lay tax burden.  These themes demonstrate the intellectual rigour of the «Bonney-Ormrod model of fiscal change», which accounts for historical fiscal systemic regression from «tax» to «domain» states, as occurred in Yorkist England, just as much as it does more commonly discussed cases of systemic fiscal advancement characteristic of much of early modern Western Europe.","PeriodicalId":42329,"journal":{"name":"Studia Historica-Historia Medieval","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fiscal Theory and Practice in Yorkist England: The Regression from a “Tax” to a “Domain” State\",\"authors\":\"Alex Brayson\",\"doi\":\"10.14201/shhme20224021134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This work scrutinises the B. P. Wolffe’s influential argument that the Yorkist «land revenue experiment» transformed the English crown’s finances.  It pioneers quantitative estimates of the Yorkist royal budget which emphasise the limited net gains derived from the crown’s resumption of alienated lands.  This demonstrates that the notion of «living of the king’s own» which was central to the work of Sir John Fortescue does not afford a realistic blueprint for how a fifteenth-century government could manage its finances, but rather denotes an ideological, class-based, opposition to the lay tax burden.  These themes demonstrate the intellectual rigour of the «Bonney-Ormrod model of fiscal change», which accounts for historical fiscal systemic regression from «tax» to «domain» states, as occurred in Yorkist England, just as much as it does more commonly discussed cases of systemic fiscal advancement characteristic of much of early modern Western Europe.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Historica-Historia Medieval\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Historica-Historia Medieval\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14201/shhme20224021134\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Historica-Historia Medieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14201/shhme20224021134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项工作仔细审查了B.P.Wolffe有影响力的论点,即约克主义的“土地收入实验”改变了英国王室的财政。它开创了对约克王室预算的定量估计,强调了王室收回被疏远的土地所带来的有限净收益。这表明,约翰·福蒂斯库爵士工作的核心“国王自己的生活”概念并不能为一个15世纪的政府如何管理其财政提供一个现实的蓝图,而是表明了一种意识形态上的、基于阶级的、反对世俗税收负担的观点。这些主题展示了“Bonney-Ormrod财政变化模型”的知识严谨性,该模型解释了从“税收”到“领域”国家的历史性财政系统性回归,正如在英国约克主义时期发生的那样,正如它所做的更常讨论的现代早期西欧大部分地区特有的系统性财政进步案例一样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fiscal Theory and Practice in Yorkist England: The Regression from a “Tax” to a “Domain” State
This work scrutinises the B. P. Wolffe’s influential argument that the Yorkist «land revenue experiment» transformed the English crown’s finances.  It pioneers quantitative estimates of the Yorkist royal budget which emphasise the limited net gains derived from the crown’s resumption of alienated lands.  This demonstrates that the notion of «living of the king’s own» which was central to the work of Sir John Fortescue does not afford a realistic blueprint for how a fifteenth-century government could manage its finances, but rather denotes an ideological, class-based, opposition to the lay tax burden.  These themes demonstrate the intellectual rigour of the «Bonney-Ormrod model of fiscal change», which accounts for historical fiscal systemic regression from «tax» to «domain» states, as occurred in Yorkist England, just as much as it does more commonly discussed cases of systemic fiscal advancement characteristic of much of early modern Western Europe.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Historica-Historia Medieval
Studia Historica-Historia Medieval MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Introducción Reflexiones y comentarios: una lectura del libro Il Medioevo degli Alberi. Piante e Paesaggi d’Italia (Secoli XI-XV) de Alfio Cortonesi Protagonistas colaterales de la historia monástica en el ámbito rural. Procesos históricos locales y génesis documental en los primeros textos del archivo del monasterio de Oseira Susurros en las tinieblas. Las mujeres en el mundo rural valenciano durante la Baja Edad Media Mutación económica-hospitalaria en el Estado señorial de los Fernández de Velasco (1380-1517)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1