{"title":"肿瘤科漏诊护理自评量表的编制及心理测试","authors":"Ruiyun Liu, W. Gao, Xiaokun Li, Qiaohong Niu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-9801.2019.12.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo develop a scientific oncology missed nursing care self-rating scale suitable for hospital culture background in China, and to test its validity and reliability. \n \n \nMethods \nThe initial scale was formulated by literature review, qualitative interview and delphi expert consultation. A total of 388 clinical nurses from Shanxi Province were selected by convenience sampling. Item analysis was used to filtrate items. The validity was evaluated by using evaluation scale of construction and content validity, and the reliability was tested by using internal consistency, split-half reliability and retest reliability. \n \n \nResults \nOncology missed nursing care self-rating scale consisted of 33 items and 4 dimensions including nursing assessment, nursing plan, basic nursing and nursing intervention. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed that 4 factors accounted for 63.664% of the accumulated variances. The scale-level content validity index (S-CVI) was 0.904. The Cronbach α coefficient was 0.948, the spilt-half reliability coefficient was 0.786, and the retest reliability coefficient was 0.833. \n \n \nConclusion \nOncology missed nursing care self-rating scale has good validity and reliability, which can be used as a measuring tool for oncology missed nursing care. \n \n \nKey words: \nNeoplasms; Oncologic nursing; Scale; Reliability; Validity","PeriodicalId":9505,"journal":{"name":"肿瘤研究与临床","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and psychometric test of oncology missed nursing care self-rating scale\",\"authors\":\"Ruiyun Liu, W. Gao, Xiaokun Li, Qiaohong Niu\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-9801.2019.12.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo develop a scientific oncology missed nursing care self-rating scale suitable for hospital culture background in China, and to test its validity and reliability. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nThe initial scale was formulated by literature review, qualitative interview and delphi expert consultation. A total of 388 clinical nurses from Shanxi Province were selected by convenience sampling. Item analysis was used to filtrate items. The validity was evaluated by using evaluation scale of construction and content validity, and the reliability was tested by using internal consistency, split-half reliability and retest reliability. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nOncology missed nursing care self-rating scale consisted of 33 items and 4 dimensions including nursing assessment, nursing plan, basic nursing and nursing intervention. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed that 4 factors accounted for 63.664% of the accumulated variances. The scale-level content validity index (S-CVI) was 0.904. The Cronbach α coefficient was 0.948, the spilt-half reliability coefficient was 0.786, and the retest reliability coefficient was 0.833. \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\nOncology missed nursing care self-rating scale has good validity and reliability, which can be used as a measuring tool for oncology missed nursing care. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nNeoplasms; Oncologic nursing; Scale; Reliability; Validity\",\"PeriodicalId\":9505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"肿瘤研究与临床\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"肿瘤研究与临床\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-9801.2019.12.010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"肿瘤研究与临床","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-9801.2019.12.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development and psychometric test of oncology missed nursing care self-rating scale
Objective
To develop a scientific oncology missed nursing care self-rating scale suitable for hospital culture background in China, and to test its validity and reliability.
Methods
The initial scale was formulated by literature review, qualitative interview and delphi expert consultation. A total of 388 clinical nurses from Shanxi Province were selected by convenience sampling. Item analysis was used to filtrate items. The validity was evaluated by using evaluation scale of construction and content validity, and the reliability was tested by using internal consistency, split-half reliability and retest reliability.
Results
Oncology missed nursing care self-rating scale consisted of 33 items and 4 dimensions including nursing assessment, nursing plan, basic nursing and nursing intervention. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed that 4 factors accounted for 63.664% of the accumulated variances. The scale-level content validity index (S-CVI) was 0.904. The Cronbach α coefficient was 0.948, the spilt-half reliability coefficient was 0.786, and the retest reliability coefficient was 0.833.
Conclusion
Oncology missed nursing care self-rating scale has good validity and reliability, which can be used as a measuring tool for oncology missed nursing care.
Key words:
Neoplasms; Oncologic nursing; Scale; Reliability; Validity
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
