单次测试研究中有效规模的计算:非交互式数据共享方法的检验

IF 0.2 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Turk Psikoloji Dergisi Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.31828/tpd1300443320181023m000015
Salih Rakap, Şerife Yücesoy-Özkan, Sinan Kalkan
{"title":"单次测试研究中有效规模的计算:非交互式数据共享方法的检验","authors":"Salih Rakap, Şerife Yücesoy-Özkan, Sinan Kalkan","doi":"10.31828/tpd1300443320181023m000015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Single-case experimental research designs are rigorous and valid methods to investigate causal or functional relationships between dependent and independent variables. These designs are commonly used in applied fields of psychology, social work, and special education. A number of different methods have been developed to calculate effect size estimates to integrate results of single-case experimental research into meta-analysis of evidence-based practices. Many researchers in the international literature use nonoverlap methods to report effect sizes for single-case experimental research studies. In Turkey, although some researchers have recently used more sophisticated nonoverlap methods to calculate effect sizes for single-case experimental research studies, many still use early nonoverlap methods that have several limitations noted in the literature. In this respect, it is important to know the characteristics of nonoverlap methods, differences among these methods, and when to use which methods for researchers, conducting single-case experimental research studies. Therefore, the main purpose of this paper is to describe 13 nonoverlap methods to calculate effect size estimates in single-case experimental research in chronological order and explain their calculations using hypothetical data sets. Moreover, this paper aims to discuss advantages and disadvantages of these methods, offer guideline for interpreting effect size estimates, and provide considerations for selecting appropriate effect size methods based data obtained from single-case experimental research studies.","PeriodicalId":45596,"journal":{"name":"Turk Psikoloji Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tek Denekli Deneysel Araştırmalarda Etki Büyüklüğü Hesaplama: Örtüşmeyen Veriye Dayalı Yöntemlerin İncelenmesi\",\"authors\":\"Salih Rakap, Şerife Yücesoy-Özkan, Sinan Kalkan\",\"doi\":\"10.31828/tpd1300443320181023m000015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Single-case experimental research designs are rigorous and valid methods to investigate causal or functional relationships between dependent and independent variables. These designs are commonly used in applied fields of psychology, social work, and special education. A number of different methods have been developed to calculate effect size estimates to integrate results of single-case experimental research into meta-analysis of evidence-based practices. Many researchers in the international literature use nonoverlap methods to report effect sizes for single-case experimental research studies. In Turkey, although some researchers have recently used more sophisticated nonoverlap methods to calculate effect sizes for single-case experimental research studies, many still use early nonoverlap methods that have several limitations noted in the literature. In this respect, it is important to know the characteristics of nonoverlap methods, differences among these methods, and when to use which methods for researchers, conducting single-case experimental research studies. Therefore, the main purpose of this paper is to describe 13 nonoverlap methods to calculate effect size estimates in single-case experimental research in chronological order and explain their calculations using hypothetical data sets. Moreover, this paper aims to discuss advantages and disadvantages of these methods, offer guideline for interpreting effect size estimates, and provide considerations for selecting appropriate effect size methods based data obtained from single-case experimental research studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turk Psikoloji Dergisi\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turk Psikoloji Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31828/tpd1300443320181023m000015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Psikoloji Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31828/tpd1300443320181023m000015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

单案例实验研究设计是研究因变量和自变量之间因果关系或函数关系的严格有效方法。这些设计通常用于心理学、社会工作和特殊教育的应用领域。已经开发了许多不同的方法来计算效应大小估计,以将单例实验研究的结果整合到循证实践的荟萃分析中。国际文献中的许多研究人员使用非重叠方法来报告单例实验研究的效应大小。在土耳其,尽管一些研究人员最近使用了更复杂的非重叠方法来计算单例实验研究的效应大小,但许多研究人员仍然使用早期的非重叠法,这些方法在文献中有一些局限性。在这方面,重要的是要了解非重叠方法的特点、这些方法之间的差异,以及研究人员何时使用哪种方法,进行个案实验研究。因此,本文的主要目的是描述13种非重叠方法,以按时间顺序计算单例实验研究中的效应大小估计,并使用假设数据集解释它们的计算。此外,本文旨在讨论这些方法的优缺点,为解释效应大小估计提供指导,并为基于单例实验研究数据选择合适的效应大小方法提供考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tek Denekli Deneysel Araştırmalarda Etki Büyüklüğü Hesaplama: Örtüşmeyen Veriye Dayalı Yöntemlerin İncelenmesi
Single-case experimental research designs are rigorous and valid methods to investigate causal or functional relationships between dependent and independent variables. These designs are commonly used in applied fields of psychology, social work, and special education. A number of different methods have been developed to calculate effect size estimates to integrate results of single-case experimental research into meta-analysis of evidence-based practices. Many researchers in the international literature use nonoverlap methods to report effect sizes for single-case experimental research studies. In Turkey, although some researchers have recently used more sophisticated nonoverlap methods to calculate effect sizes for single-case experimental research studies, many still use early nonoverlap methods that have several limitations noted in the literature. In this respect, it is important to know the characteristics of nonoverlap methods, differences among these methods, and when to use which methods for researchers, conducting single-case experimental research studies. Therefore, the main purpose of this paper is to describe 13 nonoverlap methods to calculate effect size estimates in single-case experimental research in chronological order and explain their calculations using hypothetical data sets. Moreover, this paper aims to discuss advantages and disadvantages of these methods, offer guideline for interpreting effect size estimates, and provide considerations for selecting appropriate effect size methods based data obtained from single-case experimental research studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Turk Psikoloji Dergisi
Turk Psikoloji Dergisi PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Otobiyografik Bellek İşlevleri ile Gelecek Zaman Algısı Arasındaki İlişkide Zaman Yöneliminin Aracı Rolü Algılanan İş Güvencesizliği ve İş Arama Davranışı: İş Doyumu, Duygusal Örgütsel Bağlılık ve İşten Ayrılma Niyetinin Aracı Rolü Uzun Dönemli Psikodinamik Psikoterapide Duygulanım ve Belirtisel Değişim: Boylamsal bir Çalışma Öz Tiksinme ile Psikolojik Belirtiler Arasındaki İlişkide Kendini Gizlemenin Aracı Rolü Evlilik: Sistemi Meşrulaştırma Kuramı Açısından Bir İnceleme
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1