#MeToo,交叉性和社区对话框架:中期选举“抵抗”推文的社会网络分析

IF 0.7 Q3 COMMUNICATION Electronic News Pub Date : 2023-06-15 DOI:10.1177/19312431231180606
Benjamin LaPoe, Candi S. Carter Olson, V. LaPoe, Allyson Woellert, B. Hazarika, Julia Weber
{"title":"#MeToo,交叉性和社区对话框架:中期选举“抵抗”推文的社会网络分析","authors":"Benjamin LaPoe, Candi S. Carter Olson, V. LaPoe, Allyson Woellert, B. Hazarika, Julia Weber","doi":"10.1177/19312431231180606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines Twitter “resistance” discourse leading up to the 2018 U.S. midterm elections, which was widely viewed as a response to the 2016 presidential election then President Donald J. Trump won a majority of electoral college votes while Hillary Clinton won the popular vote. When analyzing randomly selected tweets with the term “resistance” social networks emerged discussing multiple associated terms with “resistance.” Once mapping these networks, the conversation frames that drove discourse across the virtual communities included the most used frame, the #MeToo frame, along with intersectionality and community-building frames. The results of the 2016 presidential election, and Trump's victory, enabled by explicit appeals to race and gender stereotypes, prompted a wave of civic activism, included in the social media conversations outlined in this study.","PeriodicalId":29929,"journal":{"name":"Electronic News","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"#MeToo, Intersectionality, and Community Conversation Frames: A Social Network Analysis of Midterm Election “Resistance” Tweets\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin LaPoe, Candi S. Carter Olson, V. LaPoe, Allyson Woellert, B. Hazarika, Julia Weber\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19312431231180606\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines Twitter “resistance” discourse leading up to the 2018 U.S. midterm elections, which was widely viewed as a response to the 2016 presidential election then President Donald J. Trump won a majority of electoral college votes while Hillary Clinton won the popular vote. When analyzing randomly selected tweets with the term “resistance” social networks emerged discussing multiple associated terms with “resistance.” Once mapping these networks, the conversation frames that drove discourse across the virtual communities included the most used frame, the #MeToo frame, along with intersectionality and community-building frames. The results of the 2016 presidential election, and Trump's victory, enabled by explicit appeals to race and gender stereotypes, prompted a wave of civic activism, included in the social media conversations outlined in this study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electronic News\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electronic News\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19312431231180606\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic News","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19312431231180606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究考察了2018年美国中期选举前推特上的“抵抗”言论,人们普遍认为这是对2016年总统大选的回应,当时的总统唐纳德·J·特朗普赢得了大多数选举人团选票,而希拉里·克林顿赢得了普选。在分析随机选择的带有“抵抗”一词的推文时,社交网络出现了讨论与“抵抗”相关的多个术语的现象。一旦映射了这些网络,推动虚拟社区话语的对话框架包括最常用的框架#MeToo框架,以及交叉性和社区建设框架。2016年总统大选的结果,以及特朗普的胜利,在对种族和性别刻板印象的明确呼吁下,引发了一股公民激进主义浪潮,包括在本研究中概述的社交媒体对话中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
#MeToo, Intersectionality, and Community Conversation Frames: A Social Network Analysis of Midterm Election “Resistance” Tweets
This study examines Twitter “resistance” discourse leading up to the 2018 U.S. midterm elections, which was widely viewed as a response to the 2016 presidential election then President Donald J. Trump won a majority of electoral college votes while Hillary Clinton won the popular vote. When analyzing randomly selected tweets with the term “resistance” social networks emerged discussing multiple associated terms with “resistance.” Once mapping these networks, the conversation frames that drove discourse across the virtual communities included the most used frame, the #MeToo frame, along with intersectionality and community-building frames. The results of the 2016 presidential election, and Trump's victory, enabled by explicit appeals to race and gender stereotypes, prompted a wave of civic activism, included in the social media conversations outlined in this study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Electronic News
Electronic News COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Does Tribe Trump Facts? Novel Measures of Hostile Media The Social Media Comment Section as an Unruly Public Arena: How Comment Reading Erodes Trust in News Media Innovation and Determination: How Local American TV Journalists Told the COVID-19 “Story of a Lifetime” “Standard” Appearance and “Accentless” Speech: How Performance Neutrality Limits Diversity in Broadcast News Attitudes of U.S. Public Broadcasters: A Liberal Helping of Interpretive Journalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1