早期种植牙失败的危险因素:回顾性研究

Ha Nguyen Thi Khanh, M. Duc, T. T. Xuan
{"title":"早期种植牙失败的危险因素:回顾性研究","authors":"Ha Nguyen Thi Khanh, M. Duc, T. T. Xuan","doi":"10.31487/J.DOBCR.2020.04.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This retrospective study aimed to assess the risk factors associated with early implant failure using a multivariate logistic regressive model and generalized evaluating equations (GEE) analysis. A total of 892 patients who received 1931 dental implants within the period from 2015 to 2018 at Odonto-Maxillo-Facial Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam were included in this study. Several factors as age, gender, implant placement site, implant length and diameter, sinus lifting technique, the number of implants per patient, and implant brands were recorded. GEE analysis results showed that the implant-based failure rates were 6.1% after an observation period from 3 months to 3 years. Among 118 failed implants, 108 implants were lost before or at the abutment connection stage (91.5%). Male, maxilla implant placement and implant brands were identified as the risk factors for early implant loss. Implant brands which have significantly less early failure rates are Ritter, Nobel, MIS, Osstem, Neo.","PeriodicalId":72781,"journal":{"name":"Dental Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Factors of Early Dental Implant Failure: A Retrospective Study\",\"authors\":\"Ha Nguyen Thi Khanh, M. Duc, T. T. Xuan\",\"doi\":\"10.31487/J.DOBCR.2020.04.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: This retrospective study aimed to assess the risk factors associated with early implant failure using a multivariate logistic regressive model and generalized evaluating equations (GEE) analysis. A total of 892 patients who received 1931 dental implants within the period from 2015 to 2018 at Odonto-Maxillo-Facial Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam were included in this study. Several factors as age, gender, implant placement site, implant length and diameter, sinus lifting technique, the number of implants per patient, and implant brands were recorded. GEE analysis results showed that the implant-based failure rates were 6.1% after an observation period from 3 months to 3 years. Among 118 failed implants, 108 implants were lost before or at the abutment connection stage (91.5%). Male, maxilla implant placement and implant brands were identified as the risk factors for early implant loss. Implant brands which have significantly less early failure rates are Ritter, Nobel, MIS, Osstem, Neo.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31487/J.DOBCR.2020.04.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/J.DOBCR.2020.04.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本回顾性研究旨在使用多元逻辑回归模型和广义评价方程(GEE)分析来评估与早期植入失败相关的风险因素。2015年至2018年间,共有892名患者在越南胡志明市Odonto Maxillo面部医院接受了1931次牙科植入。记录了几个因素,如年龄、性别、植入物放置位置、植入物长度和直径、鼻窦提升技术、每位患者的植入物数量和植入物品牌。GEE分析结果显示,在3个月至3年的观察期后,基于植入物的失败率为6.1%。在118个失败的种植体中,108个种植体在基牙连接前或连接阶段丢失(91.5%)。男性、上颌骨种植体位置和种植体品牌被确定为早期种植体丢失的风险因素。早期失败率明显较低的植入物品牌有Ritter、Nobel、MIS、Osstem、Neo。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk Factors of Early Dental Implant Failure: A Retrospective Study
Objective: This retrospective study aimed to assess the risk factors associated with early implant failure using a multivariate logistic regressive model and generalized evaluating equations (GEE) analysis. A total of 892 patients who received 1931 dental implants within the period from 2015 to 2018 at Odonto-Maxillo-Facial Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam were included in this study. Several factors as age, gender, implant placement site, implant length and diameter, sinus lifting technique, the number of implants per patient, and implant brands were recorded. GEE analysis results showed that the implant-based failure rates were 6.1% after an observation period from 3 months to 3 years. Among 118 failed implants, 108 implants were lost before or at the abutment connection stage (91.5%). Male, maxilla implant placement and implant brands were identified as the risk factors for early implant loss. Implant brands which have significantly less early failure rates are Ritter, Nobel, MIS, Osstem, Neo.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role Of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Diagnosis of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders: A Scoping Review Evaluation of Socket Preservation Using Collagen Plug and Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin in Extracted Sockets of Mandibular Molars: A Split Mouth Study Sublingual Swelling Masquerades a Ranula: A Case Report and Review of the Literature Does Submucosal Placentrex® Injection Hasten the Soft Tissue Healing in Mandibular Third Molar Impaction Surgery? A Prospective Randomized Split-Mouth Study Finding the Way Back Home: Report of 2 Cases of Oral Metastasis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1