Phillip L. Waalkes, Daniel Andrew DeCino, Joe LeBlanc, Monica Maria Phelps-Pineda, Tiffany Somerville, Stephen V. Flynn
{"title":"辅导员教育中的一般质性学位论文:内容分析","authors":"Phillip L. Waalkes, Daniel Andrew DeCino, Joe LeBlanc, Monica Maria Phelps-Pineda, Tiffany Somerville, Stephen V. Flynn","doi":"10.1002/ceas.12261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We conducted a content analysis of generic qualitative counseling dissertations (GQR; <i>N</i> = 70), examining their methodological justifications, coherence, and trustworthiness. Dissertations authors often presented vague methodological justifications. Findings have implications for constructing methodological justifications, integrating relevant literature, and awareness of how GQR compares to other qualitative methodologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":46905,"journal":{"name":"COUNSELOR EDUCATION AND SUPERVISION","volume":"62 1","pages":"52-63"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generic qualitative dissertations in counselor education: A content analysis\",\"authors\":\"Phillip L. Waalkes, Daniel Andrew DeCino, Joe LeBlanc, Monica Maria Phelps-Pineda, Tiffany Somerville, Stephen V. Flynn\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ceas.12261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We conducted a content analysis of generic qualitative counseling dissertations (GQR; <i>N</i> = 70), examining their methodological justifications, coherence, and trustworthiness. Dissertations authors often presented vague methodological justifications. Findings have implications for constructing methodological justifications, integrating relevant literature, and awareness of how GQR compares to other qualitative methodologies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COUNSELOR EDUCATION AND SUPERVISION\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"52-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COUNSELOR EDUCATION AND SUPERVISION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ceas.12261\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COUNSELOR EDUCATION AND SUPERVISION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ceas.12261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
Generic qualitative dissertations in counselor education: A content analysis
We conducted a content analysis of generic qualitative counseling dissertations (GQR; N = 70), examining their methodological justifications, coherence, and trustworthiness. Dissertations authors often presented vague methodological justifications. Findings have implications for constructing methodological justifications, integrating relevant literature, and awareness of how GQR compares to other qualitative methodologies.
期刊介绍:
Counselor Education and Supervision is dedicated to publishing manuscripts concerned with research, theory development, or program applications related to counselor education and supervision. It is concerned with the preparation and supervision of counselors in agency or school settings, in colleges and universities or at local, state, or federal levels. This journal is the official publication of the Association for Counselor Education and Supervision (ACES), a member association of the American Counseling Association (ACA).