跨学科研究背景下的巴塞尔足迹:识字考试

Q3 Arts and Humanities Baltistica Pub Date : 2019-01-22 DOI:10.15388/BALTISTICA.53.2.2364
D. Ardoino
{"title":"跨学科研究背景下的巴塞尔足迹:识字考试","authors":"D. Ardoino","doi":"10.15388/BALTISTICA.53.2.2364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Trace of Basel within an interdisciplinary research context: forensic handwriting analysis The Trace of Basel (TB) is generally considered to be the oldest extant text not only in Old Prussian but more generally in a Baltic dialect. According to the traditional point of view  accepted by most scholars (who generally dealt only with the linguistic analysis of the micro text), the date attested in the colophon immediately preceding TB (1369) is also applicable to the micro text itself. A sort of communis opinio also concerns the origin of TB, which would have been inserted in (or in any case connected to) Prague. Furthermore, some scholars base their interpretation of TB on the hypothesis that it was written by the same hand that wrote the colophon and/or the talking drawing around which TB was inserted. All these aspects are questioned by the handwriting examination of TB, which confirms the results of the codicological, palaeographic and philological analysis of the micro text presented in Ardoino 2012a; 2012b; 2013.","PeriodicalId":36606,"journal":{"name":"Baltistica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bazelio pėdsakas tarpdisciplininių tyrimų fone: rašysenos ekspertizė\",\"authors\":\"D. Ardoino\",\"doi\":\"10.15388/BALTISTICA.53.2.2364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Trace of Basel within an interdisciplinary research context: forensic handwriting analysis The Trace of Basel (TB) is generally considered to be the oldest extant text not only in Old Prussian but more generally in a Baltic dialect. According to the traditional point of view  accepted by most scholars (who generally dealt only with the linguistic analysis of the micro text), the date attested in the colophon immediately preceding TB (1369) is also applicable to the micro text itself. A sort of communis opinio also concerns the origin of TB, which would have been inserted in (or in any case connected to) Prague. Furthermore, some scholars base their interpretation of TB on the hypothesis that it was written by the same hand that wrote the colophon and/or the talking drawing around which TB was inserted. All these aspects are questioned by the handwriting examination of TB, which confirms the results of the codicological, palaeographic and philological analysis of the micro text presented in Ardoino 2012a; 2012b; 2013.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Baltistica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Baltistica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15388/BALTISTICA.53.2.2364\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltistica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/BALTISTICA.53.2.2364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

跨学科研究背景下的巴塞尔痕迹:法医笔迹分析巴塞尔痕迹(TB)通常被认为是现存最古老的文本,不仅在旧普鲁士语中,而且在波罗的海方言中更为普遍。根据大多数学者接受的传统观点(他们通常只处理微观文本的语言学分析),TB(1369)之前的colophon中证明的日期也适用于微观文本本身。一种共产主义者的观点也涉及结核病的起源,它本应插入布拉格(或在任何情况下与布拉格有关)。此外,一些学者对TB的解释是基于这样一种假设,即TB是由写疣和/或插入TB的会说话的图画的同一个人写的。TB的笔迹检查对所有这些方面都提出了质疑,这证实了Ardoino 2012a中对微观文本的编纂、古地理和文献学分析的结果;2012b;2013
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bazelio pėdsakas tarpdisciplininių tyrimų fone: rašysenos ekspertizė
The Trace of Basel within an interdisciplinary research context: forensic handwriting analysis The Trace of Basel (TB) is generally considered to be the oldest extant text not only in Old Prussian but more generally in a Baltic dialect. According to the traditional point of view  accepted by most scholars (who generally dealt only with the linguistic analysis of the micro text), the date attested in the colophon immediately preceding TB (1369) is also applicable to the micro text itself. A sort of communis opinio also concerns the origin of TB, which would have been inserted in (or in any case connected to) Prague. Furthermore, some scholars base their interpretation of TB on the hypothesis that it was written by the same hand that wrote the colophon and/or the talking drawing around which TB was inserted. All these aspects are questioned by the handwriting examination of TB, which confirms the results of the codicological, palaeographic and philological analysis of the micro text presented in Ardoino 2012a; 2012b; 2013.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Baltistica
Baltistica Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Nauji lietuvių dvikamieniai asmenvardžiai su atviraisiais pirmaisiais kamienais Tarptautinė baltistikos mokykla Der Hexameter der Metai von Kristijonas Donelaitis: Chancen und Grenzen einer automatischen Untersuchung Georga Manceļa rakstības principi: darbības pirmais posms (līdz 1631. gadam) The phonetic interaction of prosodic elements in the Baltic languages: a tentative theoretical model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1