新冠肺炎疫情应对对湄公河地区五个国家水产养殖户的影响

IF 3.8 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Aquaculture Economics & Management Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.1080/13657305.2021.1946205
L. Lebel, Khin Maung Soe, Nguyen Thanh Phuong, H. Navy, Phouvin Phousavanh, T. Jutagate, P. Lebel, Liwa Pardthaisong, M. Akester, B. Lebel
{"title":"新冠肺炎疫情应对对湄公河地区五个国家水产养殖户的影响","authors":"L. Lebel, Khin Maung Soe, Nguyen Thanh Phuong, H. Navy, Phouvin Phousavanh, T. Jutagate, P. Lebel, Liwa Pardthaisong, M. Akester, B. Lebel","doi":"10.1080/13657305.2021.1946205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Public health measures aimed at reducing the spread of COVID-19 can have significant, unintended impacts on livelihoods. In this paper, we assess the impacts of responses to the COVID-19 pandemic on aquaculture farmers in five countries in the Mekong Region. A total of 1,019 farmers were surveyed (June–August 2020). The COVID-19 pandemic reduced farmer mobility, disrupted input and produce logistics, and reduced consumer demand, which in turn, reduced net income relative to expectations and increased the likelihood of making a net loss in the first half of 2020. Large aquaculture farms were more likely to experience adverse impacts from higher input prices and lower fish market prices than small farms. Intensive and commercial farms were more likely to be affected by supplier and buyer logistic disruptions. Coping responses included adjustments to stocking practices, reducing labor inputs, finding new markets, drawing on savings, and borrowing money. Large farms were more likely to seek new markets and borrow money. Easier loan conditions and direct cash handouts by governments helped in some locations and were desired in others. Significant differences among countries in impacts and responses reflect market and trade dependencies, as well as government capacity and willingness to support the aquaculture industry.","PeriodicalId":48854,"journal":{"name":"Aquaculture Economics & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13657305.2021.1946205","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic response on aquaculture farmers in five countries in the Mekong Region\",\"authors\":\"L. Lebel, Khin Maung Soe, Nguyen Thanh Phuong, H. Navy, Phouvin Phousavanh, T. Jutagate, P. Lebel, Liwa Pardthaisong, M. Akester, B. Lebel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13657305.2021.1946205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Public health measures aimed at reducing the spread of COVID-19 can have significant, unintended impacts on livelihoods. In this paper, we assess the impacts of responses to the COVID-19 pandemic on aquaculture farmers in five countries in the Mekong Region. A total of 1,019 farmers were surveyed (June–August 2020). The COVID-19 pandemic reduced farmer mobility, disrupted input and produce logistics, and reduced consumer demand, which in turn, reduced net income relative to expectations and increased the likelihood of making a net loss in the first half of 2020. Large aquaculture farms were more likely to experience adverse impacts from higher input prices and lower fish market prices than small farms. Intensive and commercial farms were more likely to be affected by supplier and buyer logistic disruptions. Coping responses included adjustments to stocking practices, reducing labor inputs, finding new markets, drawing on savings, and borrowing money. Large farms were more likely to seek new markets and borrow money. Easier loan conditions and direct cash handouts by governments helped in some locations and were desired in others. Significant differences among countries in impacts and responses reflect market and trade dependencies, as well as government capacity and willingness to support the aquaculture industry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aquaculture Economics & Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13657305.2021.1946205\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aquaculture Economics & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2021.1946205\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquaculture Economics & Management","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2021.1946205","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

摘要旨在减少新冠肺炎传播的公共卫生措施可能会对生计产生重大的、意想不到的影响。在这篇论文中,我们评估了应对新冠肺炎大流行对湄公河地区五个国家水产养殖农民的影响。共有1019名农民接受了调查(2020年6月至8月)。新冠肺炎疫情减少了农民流动性,扰乱了投入和生产物流,减少了消费者需求,这反过来又降低了相对于预期的净收入,并增加了2020年上半年净亏损的可能性。与小型养殖场相比,大型养殖场更有可能受到投入价格上涨和鱼类市场价格下跌的不利影响。集约化和商业化农场更有可能受到供应商和买家物流中断的影响。应对措施包括调整库存做法、减少劳动力投入、寻找新市场、利用储蓄和借款。大型农场更有可能寻求新市场并借钱。更宽松的贷款条件和政府的直接现金发放在一些地方起到了帮助作用,在其他地方也很受欢迎。各国在影响和应对措施方面的显著差异反映了市场和贸易的依赖性,以及政府支持水产养殖业的能力和意愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic response on aquaculture farmers in five countries in the Mekong Region
Abstract Public health measures aimed at reducing the spread of COVID-19 can have significant, unintended impacts on livelihoods. In this paper, we assess the impacts of responses to the COVID-19 pandemic on aquaculture farmers in five countries in the Mekong Region. A total of 1,019 farmers were surveyed (June–August 2020). The COVID-19 pandemic reduced farmer mobility, disrupted input and produce logistics, and reduced consumer demand, which in turn, reduced net income relative to expectations and increased the likelihood of making a net loss in the first half of 2020. Large aquaculture farms were more likely to experience adverse impacts from higher input prices and lower fish market prices than small farms. Intensive and commercial farms were more likely to be affected by supplier and buyer logistic disruptions. Coping responses included adjustments to stocking practices, reducing labor inputs, finding new markets, drawing on savings, and borrowing money. Large farms were more likely to seek new markets and borrow money. Easier loan conditions and direct cash handouts by governments helped in some locations and were desired in others. Significant differences among countries in impacts and responses reflect market and trade dependencies, as well as government capacity and willingness to support the aquaculture industry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
17.90%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Aquaculture Economics and Management is a peer-reviewed, international journal which aims to encourage the application of economic analysis to the management, modeling, and planning of aquaculture in public and private sectors. The journal publishes original, high quality papers related to all aspects of aquaculture economics and management including aquaculture production and farm management, innovation and technology adoption, processing and distribution, marketing, consumer behavior and pricing, international trade, policy analysis, and the role of aquaculture in food security, livelihoods, and environmental management. Papers are peer reviewed and evaluated for their scientific merits and contributions.
期刊最新文献
Constraints, persuasion or incentives? Marine aquaculture farmers’ preferences for green marine aquaculture policies based on the choice experiment How do farmers’ perceptions of food environment affect their consumption of aquatic products? Evidence from inland provinces in Northern China Analysis of pond aquaculture in the Northern Malawi: Application of stochastic frontier analysis Does government intervention promote export competitiveness? An empirical case study of Bangladesh seafood exports Is there a demand for eco-labeled restaurants: Consumer preference and willingness to pay for eco-labeled seafood restaurants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1