Hawk®JAWS与Lumenis®VersaCut前列腺粉碎装置的比较研究和综合文献综述

H. C. Aybal, S. Yılmaz, E. Gazel, E. Kaya, S. Yalçın, O. Açıkgöz, L. Tunc
{"title":"Hawk®JAWS与Lumenis®VersaCut前列腺粉碎装置的比较研究和综合文献综述","authors":"H. C. Aybal, S. Yılmaz, E. Gazel, E. Kaya, S. Yalçın, O. Açıkgöz, L. Tunc","doi":"10.33719/yud.2022;17-1-943412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Although morcellation is a standard procedure of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP), studies on the morcellators used are limited in number. We aimed to compare two different tissue morcellators used in HoLEP, which have similar objectives but differences in efficiency and safety in working principles. Material and Methods: The data of 130 patients who underwent HoLEP between December 2018 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Sixty-five patients received Lumenis® Versacut (Lumenis Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) morcellator and 65 patients received Hawk® JAWS (Hawk, Minitech Co., China) morcellator after enucleation were included in the study. The efficiency of morcellation (g/min), morcellation time (min), total operation time (min), enucleation time (min), enucleated tissue weight (g), the efficiency of enucleation, densities of the removed prostate tissues, perioperative complications associated with the use of a morcellator were recorded perioperatively. Results: There was no significant difference in total operation time (min), enucleation time (min), enucleated tissue weight (g), and efficiency of enucleation (g/min) efficiency of morcellation, morcellation time (min) between the two groups. Bladder mucosal damage occurred in 3 patients (4%) in the Versacut group, while mucosal bladder damage was not observed in any patient in the Hawk® JAWS group (p = 0.08). Conclusion: Hawk® JAWS and Lumenis® VersaCut morcellators were comparable in their efficiency and safety. Keywords: Hawk, HoLEP, morcellation, morcellator, Versacut.","PeriodicalId":33828,"journal":{"name":"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hawk® JAWS versus Lumenis® VersaCut prostate morcellation devices: A comparative study and comprehensive literature review\",\"authors\":\"H. C. Aybal, S. Yılmaz, E. Gazel, E. Kaya, S. Yalçın, O. Açıkgöz, L. Tunc\",\"doi\":\"10.33719/yud.2022;17-1-943412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Although morcellation is a standard procedure of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP), studies on the morcellators used are limited in number. We aimed to compare two different tissue morcellators used in HoLEP, which have similar objectives but differences in efficiency and safety in working principles. Material and Methods: The data of 130 patients who underwent HoLEP between December 2018 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Sixty-five patients received Lumenis® Versacut (Lumenis Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) morcellator and 65 patients received Hawk® JAWS (Hawk, Minitech Co., China) morcellator after enucleation were included in the study. The efficiency of morcellation (g/min), morcellation time (min), total operation time (min), enucleation time (min), enucleated tissue weight (g), the efficiency of enucleation, densities of the removed prostate tissues, perioperative complications associated with the use of a morcellator were recorded perioperatively. Results: There was no significant difference in total operation time (min), enucleation time (min), enucleated tissue weight (g), and efficiency of enucleation (g/min) efficiency of morcellation, morcellation time (min) between the two groups. Bladder mucosal damage occurred in 3 patients (4%) in the Versacut group, while mucosal bladder damage was not observed in any patient in the Hawk® JAWS group (p = 0.08). Conclusion: Hawk® JAWS and Lumenis® VersaCut morcellators were comparable in their efficiency and safety. Keywords: Hawk, HoLEP, morcellation, morcellator, Versacut.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33719/yud.2022;17-1-943412\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33719/yud.2022;17-1-943412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管粉碎是钬激光前列腺摘除术(HoLEP)的标准程序,但对所用粉碎器的研究数量有限。我们旨在比较HoLEP中使用的两种不同的组织粉碎器,它们具有相似的目标,但在工作原理上的效率和安全性不同。材料和方法:回顾性分析2018年12月至2019年12月期间接受HoLEP的130名患者的数据。研究包括65名患者在眼球摘除后接受Lumenis®Versacut(Lumenis股份有限公司,美国加利福尼亚州圣克拉拉)粉碎器,65名患者接受Hawk®JAWS(Hawk,Minitech Co.,China)粉碎器。术中记录粉碎效率(g/min)、粉碎时间(min)、总手术时间(min。结果:两组总手术时间(min)、去核时间(min。Versacut组有3名患者(4%)发生膀胱粘膜损伤,而Hawk®JAWS组没有任何患者出现膀胱粘膜损伤(p=0.08)。结论:Hawk®JAWS和Lumenis®Versacut粉碎器在效率和安全性方面具有可比性。关键词:Hawk,HoLEP,粉碎,粉碎器,Versacut。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hawk® JAWS versus Lumenis® VersaCut prostate morcellation devices: A comparative study and comprehensive literature review
Objective: Although morcellation is a standard procedure of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP), studies on the morcellators used are limited in number. We aimed to compare two different tissue morcellators used in HoLEP, which have similar objectives but differences in efficiency and safety in working principles. Material and Methods: The data of 130 patients who underwent HoLEP between December 2018 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Sixty-five patients received Lumenis® Versacut (Lumenis Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) morcellator and 65 patients received Hawk® JAWS (Hawk, Minitech Co., China) morcellator after enucleation were included in the study. The efficiency of morcellation (g/min), morcellation time (min), total operation time (min), enucleation time (min), enucleated tissue weight (g), the efficiency of enucleation, densities of the removed prostate tissues, perioperative complications associated with the use of a morcellator were recorded perioperatively. Results: There was no significant difference in total operation time (min), enucleation time (min), enucleated tissue weight (g), and efficiency of enucleation (g/min) efficiency of morcellation, morcellation time (min) between the two groups. Bladder mucosal damage occurred in 3 patients (4%) in the Versacut group, while mucosal bladder damage was not observed in any patient in the Hawk® JAWS group (p = 0.08). Conclusion: Hawk® JAWS and Lumenis® VersaCut morcellators were comparable in their efficiency and safety. Keywords: Hawk, HoLEP, morcellation, morcellator, Versacut.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
Does Depth of Anesthesia Effect Clinical Results of Patients Who Underwent Radical Cystectomy in Accordance with Eras Protocols? The Effects of Viburnum Opulus L. on Kidneys of Rats with Ethylene Glycol-induced Nephrolithiasis Evaluation of the Quality of Life of Patients Who Use Intermittant SelfCatheterization by Themselves and by Their Caregivers Assessment of Hematological Parameters in the Diagnosis Brucella Epididymorchitis: Comparison of Brucella Epididymorchitis and Non-Brucella Epididymorchitis An Unusual Presentation of Penile Kaposi’s Sarcoma in an HIV-Negative Patient with a Circumcised Penis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1