规划患者参与PriCare研究项目的评估

IF 0.2 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation Pub Date : 2022-04-19 DOI:10.3138/cjpe.70805
A. Danish
{"title":"规划患者参与PriCare研究项目的评估","authors":"A. Danish","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.70805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The involvement of patients, their families, or their representatives is becomingincreasingly common in health-care research. However, theoretical justif cationof patient engagement (PE) and consistent guidance on how to include patients askey stakeholders on research teams are still lacking. Tis paper describes how the Pri-Care group integrates PE into its program’s governance structure and uses a programlogic perspective to engage patients in the planning phases of a research study basedon resources, processes, and relationships, guided by the SPOR-CIHR’s PE framework.Te PriCare approach facilitates the evaluation and continuous improvement of PE.","PeriodicalId":43924,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Planning the Evaluation of Patient Engagement in the PriCare Research Program\",\"authors\":\"A. Danish\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/cjpe.70805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The involvement of patients, their families, or their representatives is becomingincreasingly common in health-care research. However, theoretical justif cationof patient engagement (PE) and consistent guidance on how to include patients askey stakeholders on research teams are still lacking. Tis paper describes how the Pri-Care group integrates PE into its program’s governance structure and uses a programlogic perspective to engage patients in the planning phases of a research study basedon resources, processes, and relationships, guided by the SPOR-CIHR’s PE framework.Te PriCare approach facilitates the evaluation and continuous improvement of PE.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43924,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.70805\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.70805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

患者、其家属或其代表的参与在医疗保健研究中越来越普遍。然而,关于患者参与(PE)的理论解释和如何将患者和关键利益相关者纳入研究团队的一致指导仍然缺乏。本文描述了Pri Care集团如何将PE整合到其项目的治理结构中,并在SPOR-CIHR的PE框架的指导下,使用程序逻辑视角,让患者参与基于资源、流程和关系的研究规划阶段。Te PriCare方法有助于PE的评估和持续改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Planning the Evaluation of Patient Engagement in the PriCare Research Program
The involvement of patients, their families, or their representatives is becomingincreasingly common in health-care research. However, theoretical justif cationof patient engagement (PE) and consistent guidance on how to include patients askey stakeholders on research teams are still lacking. Tis paper describes how the Pri-Care group integrates PE into its program’s governance structure and uses a programlogic perspective to engage patients in the planning phases of a research study basedon resources, processes, and relationships, guided by the SPOR-CIHR’s PE framework.Te PriCare approach facilitates the evaluation and continuous improvement of PE.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation
Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Arts-Based Evaluation Process Evaluation of a Cooking Circle Program in the Arctic: Developing the Mukluk Logic Model and Identifying Key Enablers and Barriers for Program Implementation Community-Based Evaluation When Localizing Sustainable Development Goals Employing Mixed-Methods Citation Analysis to Investigate Transnational Influence in Evaluation Theory Indigenous Feminist Evaluation Methods: A Case Study in “My Two Aunties”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1