研究如何有助于实现可持续发展目标?SDG管理学文献综述

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS International Journal of Management Reviews Pub Date : 2023-02-20 DOI:10.1111/ijmr.12331
Pascual Berrone, Horacio E. Rousseau, J.E. Ricart, Esther Brito, Andrea Giuliodori
{"title":"研究如何有助于实现可持续发展目标?SDG管理学文献综述","authors":"Pascual Berrone,&nbsp;Horacio E. Rousseau,&nbsp;J.E. Ricart,&nbsp;Esther Brito,&nbsp;Andrea Giuliodori","doi":"10.1111/ijmr.12331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Organizations often face challenges in incorporating the sustainable development goals (SDGs) into their strategic agendas. Despite the availability of guidelines from leading practitioners, such guidance often lacks the scientific insights provided by academia. In this study, we examine the integration of scholarly management literature into practical guidelines for achieving the SDGs. To do so, we first examined nine practitioner guidelines offered by well-reputed consulting firms, multilateral organizations and non-profits, from which we identified four underlying general processes: <i>prioritizing</i> SDGs to the most relevant strategic goals of firms, <i>contextualizing</i> the SDGs to firms’ geographical and industrial contexts, <i>collaborating</i> with other organizations and stakeholders to make more impactful progress and <i>innovating</i> via business process remodelling. Using these four processes as an overarching framework, we then conducted an interpretive literature review to mine highly cited sustainable development-related papers in the management field covering an 11-year period (2010–2020). From these studies, we derived novel connections to all four stages to offer a more robust and scientifically informed process-based framework for SDG adoption. We discuss multiple scholarly implications, including the importance of enhancing knowledge about the various phases of the SDG adoption model, developing research on understudied SDGs, and expanding theoretical and methodological approaches to SDG research. Additionally, we provide a more grounded SDG adoption model with significant practical implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":48326,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Reviews","volume":"25 2","pages":"318-339"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijmr.12331","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How can research contribute to the implementation of sustainable development goals? An interpretive review of SDG literature in management\",\"authors\":\"Pascual Berrone,&nbsp;Horacio E. Rousseau,&nbsp;J.E. Ricart,&nbsp;Esther Brito,&nbsp;Andrea Giuliodori\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijmr.12331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Organizations often face challenges in incorporating the sustainable development goals (SDGs) into their strategic agendas. Despite the availability of guidelines from leading practitioners, such guidance often lacks the scientific insights provided by academia. In this study, we examine the integration of scholarly management literature into practical guidelines for achieving the SDGs. To do so, we first examined nine practitioner guidelines offered by well-reputed consulting firms, multilateral organizations and non-profits, from which we identified four underlying general processes: <i>prioritizing</i> SDGs to the most relevant strategic goals of firms, <i>contextualizing</i> the SDGs to firms’ geographical and industrial contexts, <i>collaborating</i> with other organizations and stakeholders to make more impactful progress and <i>innovating</i> via business process remodelling. Using these four processes as an overarching framework, we then conducted an interpretive literature review to mine highly cited sustainable development-related papers in the management field covering an 11-year period (2010–2020). From these studies, we derived novel connections to all four stages to offer a more robust and scientifically informed process-based framework for SDG adoption. We discuss multiple scholarly implications, including the importance of enhancing knowledge about the various phases of the SDG adoption model, developing research on understudied SDGs, and expanding theoretical and methodological approaches to SDG research. Additionally, we provide a more grounded SDG adoption model with significant practical implications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Management Reviews\",\"volume\":\"25 2\",\"pages\":\"318-339\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijmr.12331\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Management Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijmr.12331\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijmr.12331","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

组织在将可持续发展目标(sdg)纳入其战略议程时经常面临挑战。尽管有来自主要实践者的指导方针,这些指导方针往往缺乏学术界提供的科学见解。在本研究中,我们研究了学术管理文献与实现可持续发展目标的实践指南的整合。为此,我们首先研究了由知名咨询公司、多边组织和非营利组织提供的九份从业者指南,从中我们确定了四个基本的一般流程:将可持续发展目标优先考虑到公司最相关的战略目标,将可持续发展目标与公司的地理和行业背景相结合,与其他组织和利益相关者合作以取得更有影响力的进展,并通过业务流程重塑进行创新。利用这四个过程作为总体框架,我们进行了一项解释性文献综述,以挖掘11年间(2010-2020年)管理领域与可持续发展相关的高被引论文。从这些研究中,我们得出了与所有四个阶段的新联系,为可持续发展目标的采用提供了一个更强大、更科学的基于过程的框架。我们讨论了多种学术意义,包括加强对可持续发展目标采用模式各个阶段的认识,对研究不足的可持续发展目标开展研究,以及扩大可持续发展目标研究的理论和方法方法的重要性。此外,我们还提供了一个更有基础的可持续发展目标采用模型,具有重要的实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How can research contribute to the implementation of sustainable development goals? An interpretive review of SDG literature in management

Organizations often face challenges in incorporating the sustainable development goals (SDGs) into their strategic agendas. Despite the availability of guidelines from leading practitioners, such guidance often lacks the scientific insights provided by academia. In this study, we examine the integration of scholarly management literature into practical guidelines for achieving the SDGs. To do so, we first examined nine practitioner guidelines offered by well-reputed consulting firms, multilateral organizations and non-profits, from which we identified four underlying general processes: prioritizing SDGs to the most relevant strategic goals of firms, contextualizing the SDGs to firms’ geographical and industrial contexts, collaborating with other organizations and stakeholders to make more impactful progress and innovating via business process remodelling. Using these four processes as an overarching framework, we then conducted an interpretive literature review to mine highly cited sustainable development-related papers in the management field covering an 11-year period (2010–2020). From these studies, we derived novel connections to all four stages to offer a more robust and scientifically informed process-based framework for SDG adoption. We discuss multiple scholarly implications, including the importance of enhancing knowledge about the various phases of the SDG adoption model, developing research on understudied SDGs, and expanding theoretical and methodological approaches to SDG research. Additionally, we provide a more grounded SDG adoption model with significant practical implications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Management Reviews (IJMR) stands as the premier global review journal in Organisation and Management Studies (OMS). Its published papers aim to provide substantial conceptual contributions, acting as a strategic platform for new research directions. IJMR plays a pivotal role in influencing how OMS scholars conceptualize research in their respective fields. The journal's reviews critically assess the state of knowledge in specific fields, appraising the conceptual foundations of competing paradigms to advance current and future research in the area.
期刊最新文献
Uncovering the impact of digital technologies on strategising: Evidence from a systematic literature review One name for two concepts: A systematic literature review about meta‐organizations Career success and geographical location: A systematic review and future research agenda Towards a heuristic view of managerial heuristics: Integrating divergent perspectives The good, the bad and the evil: A unified conceptualization of negative leadership behaviour
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1