接受保守治疗的慢性肾脏病患者的ICNP®术语子集

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Acta Paulista De Enfermagem Pub Date : 2023-08-09 DOI:10.37689/acta-ape/2023ao0140333
Harlon França de Menezes, A. Camacho, Rosana Moreira de Sant’Anna, Tatyana Lós de Melo Matos, Isabele Silva dos Santos, Ana Cristina da Paixão Silva, Cleide Gonçalo Rufino, Richardson Augusto Rossendo da Silva
{"title":"接受保守治疗的慢性肾脏病患者的ICNP®术语子集","authors":"Harlon França de Menezes, A. Camacho, Rosana Moreira de Sant’Anna, Tatyana Lós de Melo Matos, Isabele Silva dos Santos, Ana Cristina da Paixão Silva, Cleide Gonçalo Rufino, Richardson Augusto Rossendo da Silva","doi":"10.37689/acta-ape/2023ao0140333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To carry out content validity of the statements of International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP®) terminology subset diagnoses, outcomes and nursing interventions for people with chronic kidney disease on conservative treatment.\n\nMethods: A methodological study, which followed the Brazilian method guidelines, with content validity conducted by the Delphi technique and carried out with 67 expert nurses. A total of 123 nursing diagnosis/outcome statements and 215 nursing intervention statements, distributed by Callista Roy’s adaptation model of nursing modes were assessed. To assess the degree of agreement regarding the meaning and clinical use among experts, the Content Validity Index (CVI) was used, accepting statements that presented an index ≥ 0.80.\nResults\n\nAfter two Delphi rounds, 117 diagnoses/outcomes and 199 nursing interventions were validated. Of the diagnoses, 70 (60%) were classified in Physiological Mode, 19 (16%) in Self-Concept Mode, 17 (14%) in Real-Life Function Mode, and 11 (10%) in Callista Roy’s Interdependence Mode. Among the most prevalent diagnostic statements were: “Altered Blood Pressure”, “Peripheral Oedema”, “Fluid Retention”, “Lack of Knowledge of Dietary Regime”, “Impaired Adaptation”, “Self-Care Deficit” and “Impaired Access to Treatment”. Valid nursing interventions underwent wording changes.\n\nConclusion: The development of an ICNP® terminology subset according to the adopted theoretical model proved to be valid in terms of content for the care of people with chronic kidney disease undergoing conservative treatment through clear and directive care plans.","PeriodicalId":6891,"journal":{"name":"Acta Paulista De Enfermagem","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ICNP® terminology subset for people with chronic kidney disease under conservative treatment\",\"authors\":\"Harlon França de Menezes, A. Camacho, Rosana Moreira de Sant’Anna, Tatyana Lós de Melo Matos, Isabele Silva dos Santos, Ana Cristina da Paixão Silva, Cleide Gonçalo Rufino, Richardson Augusto Rossendo da Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.37689/acta-ape/2023ao0140333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To carry out content validity of the statements of International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP®) terminology subset diagnoses, outcomes and nursing interventions for people with chronic kidney disease on conservative treatment.\\n\\nMethods: A methodological study, which followed the Brazilian method guidelines, with content validity conducted by the Delphi technique and carried out with 67 expert nurses. A total of 123 nursing diagnosis/outcome statements and 215 nursing intervention statements, distributed by Callista Roy’s adaptation model of nursing modes were assessed. To assess the degree of agreement regarding the meaning and clinical use among experts, the Content Validity Index (CVI) was used, accepting statements that presented an index ≥ 0.80.\\nResults\\n\\nAfter two Delphi rounds, 117 diagnoses/outcomes and 199 nursing interventions were validated. Of the diagnoses, 70 (60%) were classified in Physiological Mode, 19 (16%) in Self-Concept Mode, 17 (14%) in Real-Life Function Mode, and 11 (10%) in Callista Roy’s Interdependence Mode. Among the most prevalent diagnostic statements were: “Altered Blood Pressure”, “Peripheral Oedema”, “Fluid Retention”, “Lack of Knowledge of Dietary Regime”, “Impaired Adaptation”, “Self-Care Deficit” and “Impaired Access to Treatment”. Valid nursing interventions underwent wording changes.\\n\\nConclusion: The development of an ICNP® terminology subset according to the adopted theoretical model proved to be valid in terms of content for the care of people with chronic kidney disease undergoing conservative treatment through clear and directive care plans.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Paulista De Enfermagem\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Paulista De Enfermagem\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37689/acta-ape/2023ao0140333\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Paulista De Enfermagem","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37689/acta-ape/2023ao0140333","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:验证国际护理实践分类(ICNP®)术语子集对保守治疗慢性肾脏病患者的诊断、结果和护理干预的内容有效性。方法:遵循巴西方法指南,采用德尔菲技术进行内容有效性的方法学研究,共有67名专家护士参与。通过Callista Roy的护理模式适应模型,共评估了123份护理诊断/结果陈述和215份护理干预陈述。为了评估专家们对意义和临床使用的一致程度,使用了内容有效性指数(CVI),接受了指数≥0.80的陈述。结果经过两轮德尔菲调查,117项诊断/结果和199项护理干预措施得到了验证。在诊断中,70(60%)分为生理模式,19(16%)分为自我概念模式,17(14%)分为现实生活功能模式,11(10%)分为卡利斯塔-罗伊相互依赖模式。最常见的诊断陈述包括:“血压改变”、“外周水肿”、“液体滞留”、“缺乏饮食制度知识”、“适应障碍”、“自我护理缺陷”和“治疗障碍”。有效的护理干预措施的措辞发生了变化。结论:根据所采用的理论模型开发的ICNP®术语子集在内容方面被证明是有效的,可以通过明确和指导的护理计划来护理接受保守治疗的慢性肾脏病患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ICNP® terminology subset for people with chronic kidney disease under conservative treatment
Objective: To carry out content validity of the statements of International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP®) terminology subset diagnoses, outcomes and nursing interventions for people with chronic kidney disease on conservative treatment. Methods: A methodological study, which followed the Brazilian method guidelines, with content validity conducted by the Delphi technique and carried out with 67 expert nurses. A total of 123 nursing diagnosis/outcome statements and 215 nursing intervention statements, distributed by Callista Roy’s adaptation model of nursing modes were assessed. To assess the degree of agreement regarding the meaning and clinical use among experts, the Content Validity Index (CVI) was used, accepting statements that presented an index ≥ 0.80. Results After two Delphi rounds, 117 diagnoses/outcomes and 199 nursing interventions were validated. Of the diagnoses, 70 (60%) were classified in Physiological Mode, 19 (16%) in Self-Concept Mode, 17 (14%) in Real-Life Function Mode, and 11 (10%) in Callista Roy’s Interdependence Mode. Among the most prevalent diagnostic statements were: “Altered Blood Pressure”, “Peripheral Oedema”, “Fluid Retention”, “Lack of Knowledge of Dietary Regime”, “Impaired Adaptation”, “Self-Care Deficit” and “Impaired Access to Treatment”. Valid nursing interventions underwent wording changes. Conclusion: The development of an ICNP® terminology subset according to the adopted theoretical model proved to be valid in terms of content for the care of people with chronic kidney disease undergoing conservative treatment through clear and directive care plans.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Paulista de Enfermagem – (Acta Paul Enferm.), ISSN 1982-0194, is a [bilingual] technical-scientific electronic publication of the Escola Paulista de Enfermagem – EPE, Universidade Federal de São Paulo – UNIFESP. Our mission: To disseminate the scientific knowledge generated within the rigor of research and ethics methodology. Our objective: To publish results of original research for advancement of practices of clinical, surgical, and management nursing, as well as education, research, and information and communication technology.
期刊最新文献
Hospitalização de idosos por COVID-19 no Paraná: uma análise de fatores associados Higiene das mãos dos profissionais de saúde: perspectivas do estudante de enfermagem no papel de paciente/familiar COVID-19 nas prisões: validação de um inquérito de conhecimento, atitude e prática Diagrama de prevenção de quedas para pessoas idosas: revisão integrativa Recusa familiar para doação de córneas para transplante: fatores associados e tendência
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1