直接应用于血液的多重聚合酶链式反应检测在危重患者败血症治疗中的回顾性评价

IF 0.8 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Southern African Journal of Critical Care Pub Date : 2021-12-20 DOI:10.7196/SAJCC.2021.v37i3.495
S. Omar, S. Murphy, R. Gheevarghese, N. Poppleton
{"title":"直接应用于血液的多重聚合酶链式反应检测在危重患者败血症治疗中的回顾性评价","authors":"S. Omar, S. Murphy, R. Gheevarghese, N. Poppleton","doi":"10.7196/SAJCC.2021.v37i3.495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Blood culture (BC) is the established gold standard for microbiological diagnosis of bloodstream infection (BSI); however, its sensitivity is poor. Objectives The primary objective was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the Magicplex Sepsis Real-time Test, a multiplex polymerase chain reaction test (mPCR), and BC to detect BSIs. Secondary outcomes included determining the prevalence of BSIs. Methods A retrospective review of a technical evaluation of the mPCR. Patients requiring BC had a blood sample collected for mPCR Results The respective sensitivity and specificity of mPCR for the detection of BSI were 50% (n=7/14) and 58% (n=18/31), while the sensitivity and specificity using BC were 36% (n=5/14) and 68% (n=21/31), respectively. The addition of mPCR to BC increased BSI detection during sepsis from 36% to 64%. Conclusion The use of mPCR directly applied to blood may increase the detection of micro-organisms associated with BSIs in critically ill patients requiring BC investigation. Contributions of the study Our data add to a growing body of evidence indicating that mPCR applied directly to blood prior to incubation increases the detection of pathogenic bacteria among hospitalised patients for whom blood cultures are performed for suspected infection. Our study was performed in a low-to-middle income country with a higher sepsis prevalence, a greater burden of multidrug-resistant organisms and clinically defined sepsis. This strengthens the robustness and generalisability of this body of evidence.","PeriodicalId":42653,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Journal of Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A retrospective evaluation of a multiplex polymerase chain reaction test directly applied to blood for the management of sepsis in the critically ill\",\"authors\":\"S. Omar, S. Murphy, R. Gheevarghese, N. Poppleton\",\"doi\":\"10.7196/SAJCC.2021.v37i3.495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Blood culture (BC) is the established gold standard for microbiological diagnosis of bloodstream infection (BSI); however, its sensitivity is poor. Objectives The primary objective was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the Magicplex Sepsis Real-time Test, a multiplex polymerase chain reaction test (mPCR), and BC to detect BSIs. Secondary outcomes included determining the prevalence of BSIs. Methods A retrospective review of a technical evaluation of the mPCR. Patients requiring BC had a blood sample collected for mPCR Results The respective sensitivity and specificity of mPCR for the detection of BSI were 50% (n=7/14) and 58% (n=18/31), while the sensitivity and specificity using BC were 36% (n=5/14) and 68% (n=21/31), respectively. The addition of mPCR to BC increased BSI detection during sepsis from 36% to 64%. Conclusion The use of mPCR directly applied to blood may increase the detection of micro-organisms associated with BSIs in critically ill patients requiring BC investigation. Contributions of the study Our data add to a growing body of evidence indicating that mPCR applied directly to blood prior to incubation increases the detection of pathogenic bacteria among hospitalised patients for whom blood cultures are performed for suspected infection. Our study was performed in a low-to-middle income country with a higher sepsis prevalence, a greater burden of multidrug-resistant organisms and clinically defined sepsis. This strengthens the robustness and generalisability of this body of evidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern African Journal of Critical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern African Journal of Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCC.2021.v37i3.495\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Journal of Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCC.2021.v37i3.495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景血液培养(BC)是血液感染(BSI)微生物学诊断的金标准;然而,它的灵敏度很差。目的主要目的是确定Magicplex败血症实时检测、多重聚合酶链式反应检测(mPCR)和BC检测BSI的敏感性和特异性。次要结果包括确定BSI的患病率。方法回顾性分析mPCR的技术评价。需要BC的患者采集血样进行mPCR。结果mPCR检测BSI的灵敏度和特异性分别为50%(n=7/14)和58%(n=18/31),而使用BC的灵敏度和特异度分别为36%(n=5/14)和68%(n=21/31)。在BC中加入mPCR可将败血症期间BSI的检测率从36%提高到64%。结论mPCR直接应用于血液可以增加对需要BC调查的危重患者BSI相关微生物的检测。这项研究的贡献我们的数据为越来越多的证据增添了新的内容,表明在培养前直接应用于血液的mPCR可以增加对疑似感染的住院患者的病原菌检测。我们的研究是在一个低收入到中等收入的国家进行的,该国家败血症患病率较高,耐多药生物负担较大,临床定义为败血症。这加强了这一证据体系的稳健性和可推广性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A retrospective evaluation of a multiplex polymerase chain reaction test directly applied to blood for the management of sepsis in the critically ill
Background Blood culture (BC) is the established gold standard for microbiological diagnosis of bloodstream infection (BSI); however, its sensitivity is poor. Objectives The primary objective was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the Magicplex Sepsis Real-time Test, a multiplex polymerase chain reaction test (mPCR), and BC to detect BSIs. Secondary outcomes included determining the prevalence of BSIs. Methods A retrospective review of a technical evaluation of the mPCR. Patients requiring BC had a blood sample collected for mPCR Results The respective sensitivity and specificity of mPCR for the detection of BSI were 50% (n=7/14) and 58% (n=18/31), while the sensitivity and specificity using BC were 36% (n=5/14) and 68% (n=21/31), respectively. The addition of mPCR to BC increased BSI detection during sepsis from 36% to 64%. Conclusion The use of mPCR directly applied to blood may increase the detection of micro-organisms associated with BSIs in critically ill patients requiring BC investigation. Contributions of the study Our data add to a growing body of evidence indicating that mPCR applied directly to blood prior to incubation increases the detection of pathogenic bacteria among hospitalised patients for whom blood cultures are performed for suspected infection. Our study was performed in a low-to-middle income country with a higher sepsis prevalence, a greater burden of multidrug-resistant organisms and clinically defined sepsis. This strengthens the robustness and generalisability of this body of evidence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: This Journal publishes scientific articles related to multidisciplinary critical and intensive medical care and the emergency care of critically ill humans.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes of traumatic brain injury patients in an adult intensive care unit of a South African regional hospital, without on-site neurosurgical service: A retrospective quantitative study on the neurological improvement at discharge Groote Schuur Hospital neurosurgical intensive care unit: A 2-year review of admission characteristics Deep medicine ...  Navigating the intersection of technology, cognition and ethics in the digital age of medicine Core competencies in critical care for general medical practitioners in South Africa: A Delphi study Patient perceptions of ICU physiotherapy: ‘Your body needs to go somewhere to be recharged ... ’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1