水分胁迫下牧草叶片水势与土壤水势的关系

Sergio André Tapparo, Rubens Duarte Coelho, J. Costa, Sérgio Weine Paulino Chaves, Carlos Alberto Quiloango-Chimarro, Everton Dos Santos de Oliveira
{"title":"水分胁迫下牧草叶片水势与土壤水势的关系","authors":"Sergio André Tapparo, Rubens Duarte Coelho, J. Costa, Sérgio Weine Paulino Chaves, Carlos Alberto Quiloango-Chimarro, Everton Dos Santos de Oliveira","doi":"10.18011/bioeng.2022.v16.1091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For grasses and other crops in general, soil water potential has been widely studied to determine if there is a deficit or excess of water content in the soil. However, the plant water absorption process is not only modulated by soil water potential but also by the combination of meteorological, soil depth, and crop canopy factors, which could be elucidated through water relations responses. The objective of this work was to compare the water relations of grass species established in different soil depths and subjected to water stress. Santo Agostinho (Stenotaphrum secundatum), Esmeralda (Zoysia japonica), Tanzania (Panicum maximum) and Tifton 85 (Cynodon spp.) were used in this trial. The four species of grasses were tested in four different soil rooting depths: 10, 20, 30 and 40 cm. The grasses were irrigated at soil moisture field capacity level, until the time of imposing the water stress period. Soil depth had a direct influence on leaf water potential and soil water potential. Moreover, correlation coefficients are higher in deeper soil profiles. The strongest correlations between leaf water potential and soil water potential were found in the deeper soil depth treatments. Therefore, for the soil depth treatment of 40 cm, the average R² for the four species was 0.55, the highest being 0.70 in Tanzania grass. It is possible to relate leaf water potential and soil water potential independently of the grass species used or the depth of soil available to the roots, which would allow the creation of new irrigation management strategies.","PeriodicalId":32292,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Engenharia de Biossistemas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationships between leaf water potential and soil water potential in grasses subjected to water stress\",\"authors\":\"Sergio André Tapparo, Rubens Duarte Coelho, J. Costa, Sérgio Weine Paulino Chaves, Carlos Alberto Quiloango-Chimarro, Everton Dos Santos de Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.18011/bioeng.2022.v16.1091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For grasses and other crops in general, soil water potential has been widely studied to determine if there is a deficit or excess of water content in the soil. However, the plant water absorption process is not only modulated by soil water potential but also by the combination of meteorological, soil depth, and crop canopy factors, which could be elucidated through water relations responses. The objective of this work was to compare the water relations of grass species established in different soil depths and subjected to water stress. Santo Agostinho (Stenotaphrum secundatum), Esmeralda (Zoysia japonica), Tanzania (Panicum maximum) and Tifton 85 (Cynodon spp.) were used in this trial. The four species of grasses were tested in four different soil rooting depths: 10, 20, 30 and 40 cm. The grasses were irrigated at soil moisture field capacity level, until the time of imposing the water stress period. Soil depth had a direct influence on leaf water potential and soil water potential. Moreover, correlation coefficients are higher in deeper soil profiles. The strongest correlations between leaf water potential and soil water potential were found in the deeper soil depth treatments. Therefore, for the soil depth treatment of 40 cm, the average R² for the four species was 0.55, the highest being 0.70 in Tanzania grass. It is possible to relate leaf water potential and soil water potential independently of the grass species used or the depth of soil available to the roots, which would allow the creation of new irrigation management strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Engenharia de Biossistemas\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Engenharia de Biossistemas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18011/bioeng.2022.v16.1091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Engenharia de Biossistemas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18011/bioeng.2022.v16.1091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于草和其他作物,土壤水势已被广泛研究,以确定土壤中是否存在水分不足或过量。然而,植物的吸水过程不仅受到土壤水势的调节,还受到气象、土壤深度和作物冠层因素的组合的调节,这可以通过水分关系响应来阐明。这项工作的目的是比较在不同土壤深度和水分胁迫下建立的草种的水分关系。Santo Agostinho(Stenotaphrum secundatum)、Esmeralda(结缕草)、坦桑尼亚(Panicum maximum)和Tifton 85(Cynodon spp.)用于本试验。在10、20、30和40cm四种不同的土壤生根深度下对四种草进行了试验。在土壤水分田间容量水平下对草进行灌溉,直到施加水分胁迫期。土壤深度对叶片水势和土壤水势有直接影响。此外,在较深的土壤剖面中,相关系数较高。叶片水势与土壤水势之间的相关性最强的是土壤深度较深的处理。因此,对于40 cm的土壤深度处理,这四个物种的平均R²为0.55,坦桑尼亚草的平均值最高,为0.70。可以将叶水势和土壤水势与所用的草种或根系可用的土壤深度无关,这将允许制定新的灌溉管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relationships between leaf water potential and soil water potential in grasses subjected to water stress
For grasses and other crops in general, soil water potential has been widely studied to determine if there is a deficit or excess of water content in the soil. However, the plant water absorption process is not only modulated by soil water potential but also by the combination of meteorological, soil depth, and crop canopy factors, which could be elucidated through water relations responses. The objective of this work was to compare the water relations of grass species established in different soil depths and subjected to water stress. Santo Agostinho (Stenotaphrum secundatum), Esmeralda (Zoysia japonica), Tanzania (Panicum maximum) and Tifton 85 (Cynodon spp.) were used in this trial. The four species of grasses were tested in four different soil rooting depths: 10, 20, 30 and 40 cm. The grasses were irrigated at soil moisture field capacity level, until the time of imposing the water stress period. Soil depth had a direct influence on leaf water potential and soil water potential. Moreover, correlation coefficients are higher in deeper soil profiles. The strongest correlations between leaf water potential and soil water potential were found in the deeper soil depth treatments. Therefore, for the soil depth treatment of 40 cm, the average R² for the four species was 0.55, the highest being 0.70 in Tanzania grass. It is possible to relate leaf water potential and soil water potential independently of the grass species used or the depth of soil available to the roots, which would allow the creation of new irrigation management strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Gypsum-based composites reinforced with bamboo particles Bean yield estimation using unmanned aerial vehicle imagery Cotton responses to potassium fertilization in Northeastern Brazil Soil compaction in progressive agricultural tractor treads Genetic resistance and silicon in the control of stem rot in Capsicum spp.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1