希腊通过希腊共和国资产发展基金进行私有化的经验

Q3 Social Sciences International Journal of Public Policy Pub Date : 2019-03-29 DOI:10.1504/IJPP.2019.099053
A. Vlachogiannis
{"title":"希腊通过希腊共和国资产发展基金进行私有化的经验","authors":"A. Vlachogiannis","doi":"10.1504/IJPP.2019.099053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of this article is to shed light on the ambiguous role of the Hellenic Republic Asset Development Fund (HRADF) and show that the privatisation program devised is inextricably linked to the bailout agreements signed between Greece and its lenders. The HRADF was established in order to carry out a vast program of privatisation in order to generate revenue and create the conditions for economic development. However, because of the pressure exercised both by the lenders and financial necessities, it has lacked to a certain extent democratic accountability and transparency. For the same reason, although constitutional limits on privatisation have indeed been recognised in theory, courts have been reluctant to block any specific privatisation. It is important to note that the creation of the new super-Fund seems to exacerbate these deficiencies by placing almost all important assets of the State under the supervision of the lenders.","PeriodicalId":35027,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/IJPP.2019.099053","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Greek experience of privatisation through the Hellenic Republic Asset Development Fund\",\"authors\":\"A. Vlachogiannis\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJPP.2019.099053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The goal of this article is to shed light on the ambiguous role of the Hellenic Republic Asset Development Fund (HRADF) and show that the privatisation program devised is inextricably linked to the bailout agreements signed between Greece and its lenders. The HRADF was established in order to carry out a vast program of privatisation in order to generate revenue and create the conditions for economic development. However, because of the pressure exercised both by the lenders and financial necessities, it has lacked to a certain extent democratic accountability and transparency. For the same reason, although constitutional limits on privatisation have indeed been recognised in theory, courts have been reluctant to block any specific privatisation. It is important to note that the creation of the new super-Fund seems to exacerbate these deficiencies by placing almost all important assets of the State under the supervision of the lenders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Public Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/IJPP.2019.099053\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPP.2019.099053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPP.2019.099053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是阐明希腊共和国资产发展基金(HRADF)的模糊作用,并表明所设计的私有化计划与希腊与其贷款人之间签署的救助协议密不可分。HRADF的成立是为了实施大规模的私有化计划,以创造收入并为经济发展创造条件。然而,由于贷款人和财政必需品施加的压力,它在一定程度上缺乏民主问责制和透明度。出于同样的原因,尽管宪法对私有化的限制在理论上确实得到了承认,但法院一直不愿阻止任何具体的私有化。必须指出的是,新的超级基金的设立似乎加剧了这些缺陷,将国家几乎所有重要资产置于贷款人的监督之下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Greek experience of privatisation through the Hellenic Republic Asset Development Fund
The goal of this article is to shed light on the ambiguous role of the Hellenic Republic Asset Development Fund (HRADF) and show that the privatisation program devised is inextricably linked to the bailout agreements signed between Greece and its lenders. The HRADF was established in order to carry out a vast program of privatisation in order to generate revenue and create the conditions for economic development. However, because of the pressure exercised both by the lenders and financial necessities, it has lacked to a certain extent democratic accountability and transparency. For the same reason, although constitutional limits on privatisation have indeed been recognised in theory, courts have been reluctant to block any specific privatisation. It is important to note that the creation of the new super-Fund seems to exacerbate these deficiencies by placing almost all important assets of the State under the supervision of the lenders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Public Policy
International Journal of Public Policy Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The IJPP proposes and fosters discussion on public policy issues facing nation states and national and supranational organisations, including governments, and how these diverse groups approach and solve common public policy problems. The emphasis will be on governance, accountability, the creation of wealth and wellbeing, and the implications policy choices have on nation states and their citizens. This perspective acknowledges that public policy choice and execution is complex and has ramifications on the welfare of citizens; and that, despite national differences, the actions of nation states are constrained by policies determined by supranational bodies, some of which are not directly accountable to any international body.
期刊最新文献
Preparing for the future of work: strategic responses to uncertainty in labour markets Complex Thinking in the History of Economic Thought. Aspects of Economic Complexity from Ancient Times to Modernity With the Case of Evolutionary-Institutional Economics and With Policy Implications The Impact of a Congregate Meal Programme on Facilitating Ageing in Place: The Case of an Area Agency on Ageing in Florida Public Debt, Investment and Development among Emerging Economies in Sub-Saharan Africa. Determinants of cutback management among US state governments: which cutback strategy should be used under certain context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1