意义的方式

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language Context and Text-The Social Semiotics Forum Pub Date : 2020-01-29 DOI:10.1075/langct.00024.kar
Neda Karimi, A. Moore, Annabelle Lukin
{"title":"意义的方式","authors":"Neda Karimi, A. Moore, Annabelle Lukin","doi":"10.1075/langct.00024.kar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper explores one aspect of the operationalisation of a patient-centred ideology of care by examining an\n oncologist’s answers to questions asked by her patient and his companion during a palliative oncology consultation and comparing her answers\n to the markedly different answers of another oncologist. Halliday’s concept of register and Hasan’s semantic networks are used to examine\n the oncologists’ answers. Patients’ questions create the semiotic environment for clinicians to provide the information patients need for\n informed decision-making – an important aspect of patient-centredness. The answers clinicians provide construe their position towards this\n ideology of care. Findings suggest that one way patient-centredness can be operationalised, at the level of semantics, is through providing\n elaborated answers that explicitly display the reasoning employed by the oncologist.","PeriodicalId":29846,"journal":{"name":"Language Context and Text-The Social Semiotics Forum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ways of meaning\",\"authors\":\"Neda Karimi, A. Moore, Annabelle Lukin\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/langct.00024.kar\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper explores one aspect of the operationalisation of a patient-centred ideology of care by examining an\\n oncologist’s answers to questions asked by her patient and his companion during a palliative oncology consultation and comparing her answers\\n to the markedly different answers of another oncologist. Halliday’s concept of register and Hasan’s semantic networks are used to examine\\n the oncologists’ answers. Patients’ questions create the semiotic environment for clinicians to provide the information patients need for\\n informed decision-making – an important aspect of patient-centredness. The answers clinicians provide construe their position towards this\\n ideology of care. Findings suggest that one way patient-centredness can be operationalised, at the level of semantics, is through providing\\n elaborated answers that explicitly display the reasoning employed by the oncologist.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Context and Text-The Social Semiotics Forum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Context and Text-The Social Semiotics Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00024.kar\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Context and Text-The Social Semiotics Forum","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00024.kar","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文通过检查肿瘤学家在姑息肿瘤学咨询期间对患者及其同伴提出的问题的回答,并将她的回答与另一位肿瘤学家明显不同的回答进行比较,探讨了以患者为中心的护理思想的实施的一个方面。韩礼德的语域概念和哈桑的语义网络被用来检验肿瘤学家的答案。患者的问题为临床医生创造了符号环境,为患者提供知情决策所需的信息——这是以患者为中心的一个重要方面。临床医生提供的答案解释了他们对这种护理意识形态的立场。研究结果表明,在语义层面上,以患者为中心的一种方法是提供详细的答案,明确显示肿瘤学家所采用的推理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ways of meaning
This paper explores one aspect of the operationalisation of a patient-centred ideology of care by examining an oncologist’s answers to questions asked by her patient and his companion during a palliative oncology consultation and comparing her answers to the markedly different answers of another oncologist. Halliday’s concept of register and Hasan’s semantic networks are used to examine the oncologists’ answers. Patients’ questions create the semiotic environment for clinicians to provide the information patients need for informed decision-making – an important aspect of patient-centredness. The answers clinicians provide construe their position towards this ideology of care. Findings suggest that one way patient-centredness can be operationalised, at the level of semantics, is through providing elaborated answers that explicitly display the reasoning employed by the oncologist.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
40.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Review of Harris (2021): The linguistics wars: Chomsky, Lakoff, and the battle over deep structure Graduating points of view in Spanish written language A comparative study of nominal group systems and structures between Lhasa Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese The diachronic analysis of resultative constructions Structure markers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1