现行农用地用途类型分类法分析及改进建议

Y. Dorosh, A. Barvinskyi, S. Ibatullin, A. Dorosh, O. Dorosh
{"title":"现行农用地用途类型分类法分析及改进建议","authors":"Y. Dorosh, A. Barvinskyi, S. Ibatullin, A. Dorosh, O. Dorosh","doi":"10.31548/zemleustriy2021.02.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The analysis of the current Classification of types of intended purposes of land use is carried out. It is established that the existing 2-level Classification does not meet the modern requirements for monitoring land relations and the norms of current land legislation. The structure and content of the 4-level Classifier of typesof intended purposes of land use are proposed, which allows to determine in detail the type of permitted land use. It is established that the current classifier does not distinguish between the form of management and the type of land use. This issue is especially evident in the example of agricultural land, in which case the types of intended purposes indicate the legal form of landowner or user, rather than regulating the direct use of land. The proposed 4-level classifier is able to distinguish between the form of management and the type of land use. In forming this Classifier, the principles of complexity, systematicity, exhaustiveness, hierarchy and legality are taken into account; requirements of automated technologies for maintaining the State Land Cadastre and remote methods of land monitoring are considered, comprehensive and systematic methodological approaches in compliance with current domestic land legislation and relevant bylawsare applied; principles of openness and manufacturability, as well as recommendations of international organizationsare taken into account.","PeriodicalId":56214,"journal":{"name":"Zemleustrij Kadastr i Monitoring Zemel''","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the current classifier of types of purpose of agricultural lands and proposals for its improvement\",\"authors\":\"Y. Dorosh, A. Barvinskyi, S. Ibatullin, A. Dorosh, O. Dorosh\",\"doi\":\"10.31548/zemleustriy2021.02.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The analysis of the current Classification of types of intended purposes of land use is carried out. It is established that the existing 2-level Classification does not meet the modern requirements for monitoring land relations and the norms of current land legislation. The structure and content of the 4-level Classifier of typesof intended purposes of land use are proposed, which allows to determine in detail the type of permitted land use. It is established that the current classifier does not distinguish between the form of management and the type of land use. This issue is especially evident in the example of agricultural land, in which case the types of intended purposes indicate the legal form of landowner or user, rather than regulating the direct use of land. The proposed 4-level classifier is able to distinguish between the form of management and the type of land use. In forming this Classifier, the principles of complexity, systematicity, exhaustiveness, hierarchy and legality are taken into account; requirements of automated technologies for maintaining the State Land Cadastre and remote methods of land monitoring are considered, comprehensive and systematic methodological approaches in compliance with current domestic land legislation and relevant bylawsare applied; principles of openness and manufacturability, as well as recommendations of international organizationsare taken into account.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zemleustrij Kadastr i Monitoring Zemel''\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zemleustrij Kadastr i Monitoring Zemel''\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31548/zemleustriy2021.02.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zemleustrij Kadastr i Monitoring Zemel''","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31548/zemleustriy2021.02.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

对现行的土地用途类型分类进行了分析。已经确定,现有的二级分类不符合监测土地关系的现代要求和现行土地立法的规范。提出了四级土地用途类型分类器的结构和内容,可以详细确定许可土地用途的类型。目前的分类法没有区分管理形式和土地利用类型。这一问题在农业用地的例子中尤为明显,在这种情况下,预期用途的类型表明了土地所有者或使用者的法律形式,而不是规范土地的直接使用。所提出的4级分类器能够区分管理形式和土地利用类型。在形成这一分类器时,考虑到了复杂性、系统性、穷尽性、层次性和合法性的原则;考虑了维护国家土地地籍的自动化技术要求和土地监测的远程方法,采用了符合现行国内土地立法和相关法规的全面和系统的方法;开放性和可制造性原则以及国际组织的建议都得到了考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of the current classifier of types of purpose of agricultural lands and proposals for its improvement
The analysis of the current Classification of types of intended purposes of land use is carried out. It is established that the existing 2-level Classification does not meet the modern requirements for monitoring land relations and the norms of current land legislation. The structure and content of the 4-level Classifier of typesof intended purposes of land use are proposed, which allows to determine in detail the type of permitted land use. It is established that the current classifier does not distinguish between the form of management and the type of land use. This issue is especially evident in the example of agricultural land, in which case the types of intended purposes indicate the legal form of landowner or user, rather than regulating the direct use of land. The proposed 4-level classifier is able to distinguish between the form of management and the type of land use. In forming this Classifier, the principles of complexity, systematicity, exhaustiveness, hierarchy and legality are taken into account; requirements of automated technologies for maintaining the State Land Cadastre and remote methods of land monitoring are considered, comprehensive and systematic methodological approaches in compliance with current domestic land legislation and relevant bylawsare applied; principles of openness and manufacturability, as well as recommendations of international organizationsare taken into account.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Current state and prospects of land circulation in Ukraine To the issue of development of workingland management projects to improve unproductive lands Analysis of scientific-methodical approaches to assessing the impact of hostilities on land productivity from scientific-methodical approaches to assessing the impact of hostilities on land productivity Receipt of rental payment for the use of natural budgets in the local budget in the context of modernizing the economic mechanism of natural use Study of changes in land cover categories in Ukraine based on remote sensing data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1