民粹主义激进右翼对德国公民社会的干预及其对策研究

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE German Politics Pub Date : 2022-04-18 DOI:10.1080/09644008.2022.2062326
Wolfgang Schroeder, Samuel Greef, Jennifer Ten Elsen, Lukas Heller
{"title":"民粹主义激进右翼对德国公民社会的干预及其对策研究","authors":"Wolfgang Schroeder, Samuel Greef, Jennifer Ten Elsen, Lukas Heller","doi":"10.1080/09644008.2022.2062326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines interventions by the populist radical right in German civil society and responses from established organisations in three areas: work, religion and sport. The empirical results indicate that the populist radical right intervenes by attacking established actors for being part of the institutional arrangement and by reinterpreting existing conflicts according to a populist logic. The interventions follow from a combination of opportunity structures (path-dependent lines of conflict within specific areas) and windows of opportunity (such as via events that attract great public attention). The responses by civil society organisations are situational and oscillate between value-based demarcation and content-based confrontation. Therefore, civil society faces the challenge of acting not as a gateway but as a protective factor against right-wing populism by developing strategies of resilience.","PeriodicalId":46640,"journal":{"name":"German Politics","volume":"32 1","pages":"585 - 604"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interventions by the Populist Radical Right in German Civil Society and the Search for Counterstrategies\",\"authors\":\"Wolfgang Schroeder, Samuel Greef, Jennifer Ten Elsen, Lukas Heller\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09644008.2022.2062326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article examines interventions by the populist radical right in German civil society and responses from established organisations in three areas: work, religion and sport. The empirical results indicate that the populist radical right intervenes by attacking established actors for being part of the institutional arrangement and by reinterpreting existing conflicts according to a populist logic. The interventions follow from a combination of opportunity structures (path-dependent lines of conflict within specific areas) and windows of opportunity (such as via events that attract great public attention). The responses by civil society organisations are situational and oscillate between value-based demarcation and content-based confrontation. Therefore, civil society faces the challenge of acting not as a gateway but as a protective factor against right-wing populism by developing strategies of resilience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"German Politics\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"585 - 604\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"German Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2022.2062326\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2022.2062326","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

摘要本文考察了民粹主义激进右翼对德国公民社会的干预,以及老牌组织在工作、宗教和体育三个领域的回应。实证结果表明,民粹主义激进右翼通过攻击既定行为者作为制度安排的一部分,并根据民粹主义逻辑重新解释现有冲突来进行干预。干预措施结合了机会结构(特定地区内依赖路径的冲突线)和机会之窗(例如通过吸引公众极大关注的事件)。民间社会组织的反应是情境性的,在基于价值的划分和基于内容的对抗之间摇摆不定。因此,民间社会面临的挑战不是作为一个门户,而是作为一个保护因素,通过制定韧性战略来对抗右翼民粹主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interventions by the Populist Radical Right in German Civil Society and the Search for Counterstrategies
ABSTRACT This article examines interventions by the populist radical right in German civil society and responses from established organisations in three areas: work, religion and sport. The empirical results indicate that the populist radical right intervenes by attacking established actors for being part of the institutional arrangement and by reinterpreting existing conflicts according to a populist logic. The interventions follow from a combination of opportunity structures (path-dependent lines of conflict within specific areas) and windows of opportunity (such as via events that attract great public attention). The responses by civil society organisations are situational and oscillate between value-based demarcation and content-based confrontation. Therefore, civil society faces the challenge of acting not as a gateway but as a protective factor against right-wing populism by developing strategies of resilience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
German Politics
German Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Against All Odds? A Discourse Network Analysis of the Political Debate About the German Passenger Car Toll Act German Legislators’ Conceptions of Democracy and Process Preferences: Results from a New Survey Germany’s Triangular Relations with the United States and China in the Era of the Zeitenwende The Effects of Federalism, Corporatism and Legislative Power on Health System Transformation in Germany Erythrocyte fatty acid aberrations in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Correlation with disease duration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1