南非手语中的否定句和极性问答句

IF 0.4 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Sign Language & Linguistics Pub Date : 2020-12-15 DOI:10.1075/sll.19014.hud
Kate Huddlestone
{"title":"南非手语中的否定句和极性问答句","authors":"Kate Huddlestone","doi":"10.1075/sll.19014.hud","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper contributes to the typological debate of whether sign languages should be divided into manual versus non-manual\n dominant languages, w.r.t. negation, a distinction that has recently been challenged (Johnston\n 2018) or argued to be too radical (Oomen & Pfau 2017), by providing a\n characterization of negation in South African Sign Language (SASL). It has also been observed in several sign languages that a construction\n which consists of a yes-no question followed by a negative fragment answer, both produced by the same speaker, can be used to negate a\n proposition. While this question-answer pair construction has received attention in the recent sign language literature, it is only\n mentioned in passing in the literature on negation. In this paper, I provide an analysis of these polar question-answer clauses as a\n grammaticalized negation strategy in SASL, following Caponigro and Davidson’s (2011) analysis of\n this construction in ASL.","PeriodicalId":43398,"journal":{"name":"Sign Language & Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Negation and polar question–answer clauses in South African Sign Language\",\"authors\":\"Kate Huddlestone\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/sll.19014.hud\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper contributes to the typological debate of whether sign languages should be divided into manual versus non-manual\\n dominant languages, w.r.t. negation, a distinction that has recently been challenged (Johnston\\n 2018) or argued to be too radical (Oomen & Pfau 2017), by providing a\\n characterization of negation in South African Sign Language (SASL). It has also been observed in several sign languages that a construction\\n which consists of a yes-no question followed by a negative fragment answer, both produced by the same speaker, can be used to negate a\\n proposition. While this question-answer pair construction has received attention in the recent sign language literature, it is only\\n mentioned in passing in the literature on negation. In this paper, I provide an analysis of these polar question-answer clauses as a\\n grammaticalized negation strategy in SASL, following Caponigro and Davidson’s (2011) analysis of\\n this construction in ASL.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sign Language & Linguistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sign Language & Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.19014.hud\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sign Language & Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.19014.hud","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文通过对南非手语(SASL)中否定的描述,为手语是否应分为手动主导语言和非手动主导语言的类型学争论做出了贡献,即否定,这一区别最近受到了质疑(Johnston 2018)或被认为过于激进(Oomen&Pfau 2017)。在几种手语中也观察到,由同一说话者提出的肯定-否问题和否定片段答案组成的结构可以用来否定命题。虽然这种问答对结构在最近的手语文学中受到了关注,但在否定文学中它只是偶尔被提及。在本文中,继Caponigro和Davidson(2011)对ASL中的这种结构的分析之后,我对这些极性问答从句作为SASL中的语法化否定策略进行了分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Negation and polar question–answer clauses in South African Sign Language
This paper contributes to the typological debate of whether sign languages should be divided into manual versus non-manual dominant languages, w.r.t. negation, a distinction that has recently been challenged (Johnston 2018) or argued to be too radical (Oomen & Pfau 2017), by providing a characterization of negation in South African Sign Language (SASL). It has also been observed in several sign languages that a construction which consists of a yes-no question followed by a negative fragment answer, both produced by the same speaker, can be used to negate a proposition. While this question-answer pair construction has received attention in the recent sign language literature, it is only mentioned in passing in the literature on negation. In this paper, I provide an analysis of these polar question-answer clauses as a grammaticalized negation strategy in SASL, following Caponigro and Davidson’s (2011) analysis of this construction in ASL.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Sign Language & Linguistics is a peer-reviewed, international journal which aims to increase our understanding of language by providing an academic forum for researchers to discuss sign languages in the larger context of natural language, crosslinguistically and crossmodally. SLL presents studies that apply existing theoretical insights to sign language in order to further our understanding of SL; it investigates and expands our knowledge of grammar based on the study of SL and it specifically addresses the effect of modality (signed vs. spoken) on the structure of grammar.
期刊最新文献
Units of sub-sign meaning in NGT Wh-doubling in German Sign Language Typological approach of meaningful components in several sign languages (SLs) with varying degrees of social integration Sizing up adjectives Age of exposure and subject/object asymmetries when wh-movement goes rightward
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1