计算机科学与计算思维教学中教师教学风格的承受与局限

IF 3 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Computer Science Education Pub Date : 2022-12-25 DOI:10.1080/08993408.2022.2154992
Kristin A. Searle, Colby Tofel-Grehl, Liam Fischback, Tyler Hansen
{"title":"计算机科学与计算思维教学中教师教学风格的承受与局限","authors":"Kristin A. Searle, Colby Tofel-Grehl, Liam Fischback, Tyler Hansen","doi":"10.1080/08993408.2022.2154992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background and Context There is a need for teachers who are prepared to teach integrated CS/CT throughout the K-12 curriculum. Drawing on three vignettes of teacher instructional practice, we build on a growing body of literature around how teachers integrate CS/CT into their classrooms after attending CS/CT focused professional development. Objective We are interested in what different instructional approaches look like when elementary teachers engage in teaching CS/CT and what kinds of discourse accompany each of these instructional approaches. Method We utilized a two-step process to code video data of classroom instruction for four teachers. We conducted macro level coding to gain an understanding of the types of knowledge, instructional strategies, and discourse displayed by each teacher. We then conducted micro-level discourse analysis utilizing Brennan and Resnick’s framework for assessing the development of computational thinking. Findings We present vignettes of teachers using three distinct instructional approaches, direct instruction, discovery learning, and scaffolding and modeling. We look across vignettes to discuss the affordances and limitations of each instructional approach. Implications Our findings have implications for how we design curriculum and instruction and conduct CS/CT professional development for K-12 teachers who will integrate CS/CT with other subjects.","PeriodicalId":45844,"journal":{"name":"Computer Science Education","volume":"33 1","pages":"139 - 161"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Affordances and limitations of teachers instructional styles when teaching computer science and computational thinking\",\"authors\":\"Kristin A. Searle, Colby Tofel-Grehl, Liam Fischback, Tyler Hansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08993408.2022.2154992\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Background and Context There is a need for teachers who are prepared to teach integrated CS/CT throughout the K-12 curriculum. Drawing on three vignettes of teacher instructional practice, we build on a growing body of literature around how teachers integrate CS/CT into their classrooms after attending CS/CT focused professional development. Objective We are interested in what different instructional approaches look like when elementary teachers engage in teaching CS/CT and what kinds of discourse accompany each of these instructional approaches. Method We utilized a two-step process to code video data of classroom instruction for four teachers. We conducted macro level coding to gain an understanding of the types of knowledge, instructional strategies, and discourse displayed by each teacher. We then conducted micro-level discourse analysis utilizing Brennan and Resnick’s framework for assessing the development of computational thinking. Findings We present vignettes of teachers using three distinct instructional approaches, direct instruction, discovery learning, and scaffolding and modeling. We look across vignettes to discuss the affordances and limitations of each instructional approach. Implications Our findings have implications for how we design curriculum and instruction and conduct CS/CT professional development for K-12 teachers who will integrate CS/CT with other subjects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Science Education\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"139 - 161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Science Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2022.2154992\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2022.2154992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要背景和背景需要准备在整个K-12课程中教授综合CS/CT的教师。根据教师教学实践的三个小插曲,我们建立在越来越多的文献基础上,这些文献围绕着教师在参加以CS/CT为重点的专业发展后如何将CS/CT融入课堂。目的我们感兴趣的是,当小学教师参与CS/CT教学时,不同的教学方法是什么样子的,以及每种教学方法都伴随着什么样的话语。方法采用两步程序对四位教师的课堂教学视频数据进行编码。我们进行了宏观层面的编码,以了解每位教师所展示的知识类型、教学策略和话语。然后,我们利用Brennan和Resnick的框架对计算思维的发展进行了微观层面的话语分析。研究结果我们展示了教师使用三种不同的教学方法的小插曲,即直接教学、发现学习、支架和建模。我们通过小插曲来讨论每种教学方法的可供性和局限性。启示我们的研究结果对我们如何为K-12教师设计课程和教学以及进行CS/CT专业发展具有启示,这些教师将CS/CT与其他科目相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Affordances and limitations of teachers instructional styles when teaching computer science and computational thinking
ABSTRACT Background and Context There is a need for teachers who are prepared to teach integrated CS/CT throughout the K-12 curriculum. Drawing on three vignettes of teacher instructional practice, we build on a growing body of literature around how teachers integrate CS/CT into their classrooms after attending CS/CT focused professional development. Objective We are interested in what different instructional approaches look like when elementary teachers engage in teaching CS/CT and what kinds of discourse accompany each of these instructional approaches. Method We utilized a two-step process to code video data of classroom instruction for four teachers. We conducted macro level coding to gain an understanding of the types of knowledge, instructional strategies, and discourse displayed by each teacher. We then conducted micro-level discourse analysis utilizing Brennan and Resnick’s framework for assessing the development of computational thinking. Findings We present vignettes of teachers using three distinct instructional approaches, direct instruction, discovery learning, and scaffolding and modeling. We look across vignettes to discuss the affordances and limitations of each instructional approach. Implications Our findings have implications for how we design curriculum and instruction and conduct CS/CT professional development for K-12 teachers who will integrate CS/CT with other subjects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computer Science Education
Computer Science Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Computer Science Education publishes high-quality papers with a specific focus on teaching and learning within the computing discipline. The journal seeks novel contributions that are accessible and of interest to researchers and practitioners alike. We invite work with learners of all ages and across both classroom and out-of-classroom learning contexts.
期刊最新文献
“These two worlds are antithetical”: epistemic tensions in integrating computational thinking in K12 humanities and arts Exploring young people’s perceptions and discourses of technology occupations through descriptive drawings and a questionnaire A review of arts integration in K-12 CS education: gathering STEAM for inclusive learning Investigating the psychometric features of a locally designed computational thinking assessment for elementary students Integrating coding across the curriculum: a scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1