技术转移效率评价的多准则决策方法比较分析

IF 2.1 Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Business Management and Education Pub Date : 2019-08-20 DOI:10.3846/BME.2019.11014
Lidija Kraujalienė
{"title":"技术转移效率评价的多准则决策方法比较分析","authors":"Lidija Kraujalienė","doi":"10.3846/BME.2019.11014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – to find appropriate tools to measure the efficiency of the technology transfer process (TTP) in higher education institutions (HEIs). Scientific problem is a lack of methods measuring the efficiency of TTP. The objective – comparative analysis of efficiency evaluation methods.\n\n\nResearch methodology – the research methodology is based on a comparative analysis of the research papers on the advantages and disadvantages of methods suitable to evaluate the efficiency of TTP.\n\n\nFindings – among some tools, FARE is highlighted for identifying the variables of TTP and assigning their weights, when TOPSIS – to rank the variables and identify the most important. MULTO-MOORA and COPRAS methods with ranking abilities are suitable to select the number of HEIs. DEA method is intended for the economic evaluation of TTP efficiency in HEIs. The social sciences are strengthened by suitable founded tools to measure the efficiency of TTP in HEIs.\n\n\nResearch limitations – this paper is providing all advantages and disadvantages (limitations) of decision-making multicriteria methods.\n\n\nPractical implications – the original structure of methods enabling stakeholders (HEIs, TTOs and public authorities) for efficient allocation of an organisation’s financial resources, foresee the future goals for improving the efficiency of TTP.\n\n\nOriginality/Value – the original framework of methods incorporated into the one model, enabling related stakeholders (HEIs, TTOs and public authorities) allocate financial resources efficiently.","PeriodicalId":42227,"journal":{"name":"Business Management and Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"53","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS EVALUATING THE EFFICIENCY OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER\",\"authors\":\"Lidija Kraujalienė\",\"doi\":\"10.3846/BME.2019.11014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose – to find appropriate tools to measure the efficiency of the technology transfer process (TTP) in higher education institutions (HEIs). Scientific problem is a lack of methods measuring the efficiency of TTP. The objective – comparative analysis of efficiency evaluation methods.\\n\\n\\nResearch methodology – the research methodology is based on a comparative analysis of the research papers on the advantages and disadvantages of methods suitable to evaluate the efficiency of TTP.\\n\\n\\nFindings – among some tools, FARE is highlighted for identifying the variables of TTP and assigning their weights, when TOPSIS – to rank the variables and identify the most important. MULTO-MOORA and COPRAS methods with ranking abilities are suitable to select the number of HEIs. DEA method is intended for the economic evaluation of TTP efficiency in HEIs. The social sciences are strengthened by suitable founded tools to measure the efficiency of TTP in HEIs.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations – this paper is providing all advantages and disadvantages (limitations) of decision-making multicriteria methods.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications – the original structure of methods enabling stakeholders (HEIs, TTOs and public authorities) for efficient allocation of an organisation’s financial resources, foresee the future goals for improving the efficiency of TTP.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/Value – the original framework of methods incorporated into the one model, enabling related stakeholders (HEIs, TTOs and public authorities) allocate financial resources efficiently.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business Management and Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"53\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business Management and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3846/BME.2019.11014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Management and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/BME.2019.11014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

摘要

目的——寻找合适的工具来衡量高等教育机构(HEI)技术转让过程(TTP)的效率。科学问题是缺乏衡量TTP效率的方法。效率评价方法的客观比较分析。研究方法论——研究方法论基于对适合评估TTP效率的方法的优缺点的研究论文的比较分析。研究结果——在一些工具中,强调FARE用于识别TTP的变量并分配其权重,当TOPSIS时——对变量进行排名并确定最重要的变量。具有排序能力的MULTO-MOORA和COPRAS方法适用于选择HEI的数量。DEA方法用于高等学校TTP效率的经济评价。社会科学通过合适的工具来加强,以衡量高等教育中TTP的效率。研究局限性——本文提供了决策多准则方法的所有优点和缺点(局限性)。实际意义——使利益相关者(高等教育机构、技术转让组织和公共当局)能够有效分配组织财政资源的方法的原始结构,预见提高TTP效率的未来目标。独创性/价值——纳入一个模型的方法的原始框架,使相关利益攸关方(高等教育机构、技术转让组织和公共当局)能够有效地分配财政资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS EVALUATING THE EFFICIENCY OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER
Purpose – to find appropriate tools to measure the efficiency of the technology transfer process (TTP) in higher education institutions (HEIs). Scientific problem is a lack of methods measuring the efficiency of TTP. The objective – comparative analysis of efficiency evaluation methods. Research methodology – the research methodology is based on a comparative analysis of the research papers on the advantages and disadvantages of methods suitable to evaluate the efficiency of TTP. Findings – among some tools, FARE is highlighted for identifying the variables of TTP and assigning their weights, when TOPSIS – to rank the variables and identify the most important. MULTO-MOORA and COPRAS methods with ranking abilities are suitable to select the number of HEIs. DEA method is intended for the economic evaluation of TTP efficiency in HEIs. The social sciences are strengthened by suitable founded tools to measure the efficiency of TTP in HEIs. Research limitations – this paper is providing all advantages and disadvantages (limitations) of decision-making multicriteria methods. Practical implications – the original structure of methods enabling stakeholders (HEIs, TTOs and public authorities) for efficient allocation of an organisation’s financial resources, foresee the future goals for improving the efficiency of TTP. Originality/Value – the original framework of methods incorporated into the one model, enabling related stakeholders (HEIs, TTOs and public authorities) allocate financial resources efficiently.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
ANALISIS IMPLEMENTASI NILAI-NILAI ETIKA BISNIS ISLAM DI SWALAYAN BERKAH BIMA TAHUN 2022 ANALISIS PENGARUH LINGKUNGAN KERJA, KOMPENSASI TERHADAP KINERJA TENAGA PENDIDIK MELALUI KEPUASAN KERJA SEBAGAI VARIABEL INTERVENING DI ERA COVID-19 Tingkat Pendapatan Masyarakat Pesisir dalam Pemanfaatan Dana Ekonomi Produktif (DEP) Kinerja Perawat di Ruang Rawat Inap RSUD Bima Renovasi Pasar Semparu Terahadap Persepsi Pedagang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1