将公民众筹理解为利用公民参与和城市创新的机制

IF 1.6 Q3 MANAGEMENT Technology Innovation Management Review Pub Date : 2020-05-31 DOI:10.22215/timreview/1356
Bastiaan Baccarne, Tom Evens, L. De Marez
{"title":"将公民众筹理解为利用公民参与和城市创新的机制","authors":"Bastiaan Baccarne, Tom Evens, L. De Marez","doi":"10.22215/timreview/1356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article studies the emergence of government-initiated civic crowdfunding platforms. Such platforms can be considered as governmental responses for bottom-up peer-to-peer support mechanisms related to urban innovation, which also allows top-down governance and governmental support systems for civic entrepreneurship. To better understand the implications of these innovative ICT-enabled interaction interfaces for collective urban innovation, this study investigates participation inequalities from the perspective of campaign instigators, using in-depth interviews (N=28), and from the perspective of the citizen-funder, using a survey (N=265). The analysis shows that urban crowdfunding practices mainly contribute to higher-level development of collective identities with increased neighborhood capacities. Although participation in such ICT-enabled interaction interfaces could reinforce digital inequalities and existing power balances, this research shows a more nuanced perspective, in which online and offline practices intertwine. Furthermore, while civic crowdfunding campaigns are driven by a traditional ‘participation elite’, the deliberation process on development projects involves new publics that are not typically engaged in civic activities. Hence, civic crowdfunding formulates a new mode of civic engagement in which institutional involvement acts as a trust broker between civic funders and civic entrepreneurs, as well as adding legitimacy to innovation processes in the public sphere.","PeriodicalId":51569,"journal":{"name":"Technology Innovation Management Review","volume":"10 1","pages":"51-66"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Civic Crowdfunding as a Mechanism for Leveraging Civic Engagement and Urban Innovation\",\"authors\":\"Bastiaan Baccarne, Tom Evens, L. De Marez\",\"doi\":\"10.22215/timreview/1356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article studies the emergence of government-initiated civic crowdfunding platforms. Such platforms can be considered as governmental responses for bottom-up peer-to-peer support mechanisms related to urban innovation, which also allows top-down governance and governmental support systems for civic entrepreneurship. To better understand the implications of these innovative ICT-enabled interaction interfaces for collective urban innovation, this study investigates participation inequalities from the perspective of campaign instigators, using in-depth interviews (N=28), and from the perspective of the citizen-funder, using a survey (N=265). The analysis shows that urban crowdfunding practices mainly contribute to higher-level development of collective identities with increased neighborhood capacities. Although participation in such ICT-enabled interaction interfaces could reinforce digital inequalities and existing power balances, this research shows a more nuanced perspective, in which online and offline practices intertwine. Furthermore, while civic crowdfunding campaigns are driven by a traditional ‘participation elite’, the deliberation process on development projects involves new publics that are not typically engaged in civic activities. Hence, civic crowdfunding formulates a new mode of civic engagement in which institutional involvement acts as a trust broker between civic funders and civic entrepreneurs, as well as adding legitimacy to innovation processes in the public sphere.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51569,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology Innovation Management Review\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"51-66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology Innovation Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1356\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology Innovation Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文研究了政府发起的公民众筹平台的出现。这些平台可以被视为政府对与城市创新相关的自下而上的对等支持机制的回应,这也允许自上而下的治理和政府对公民创业的支持系统。为了更好地理解这些创新的信息和通信技术交互界面对城市集体创新的影响,本研究通过深入访谈(N=28)和调查(N=265),从运动煽动者的角度调查了参与不平等。分析表明,城市众筹实践主要有助于集体身份的更高层次发展,增加社区容量。尽管参与这种基于信息和通信技术的互动界面可能会加剧数字不平等和现有的权力平衡,但这项研究显示了一个更微妙的视角,在线和离线实践相互交织。此外,虽然公民众筹活动是由传统的“参与精英”推动的,但发展项目的审议过程涉及通常不参与公民活动的新公众。因此,公民众筹形成了一种新的公民参与模式,在这种模式中,机构参与充当了公民资助者和公民企业家之间的信任中介,并为公共领域的创新过程增加了合法性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding Civic Crowdfunding as a Mechanism for Leveraging Civic Engagement and Urban Innovation
This article studies the emergence of government-initiated civic crowdfunding platforms. Such platforms can be considered as governmental responses for bottom-up peer-to-peer support mechanisms related to urban innovation, which also allows top-down governance and governmental support systems for civic entrepreneurship. To better understand the implications of these innovative ICT-enabled interaction interfaces for collective urban innovation, this study investigates participation inequalities from the perspective of campaign instigators, using in-depth interviews (N=28), and from the perspective of the citizen-funder, using a survey (N=265). The analysis shows that urban crowdfunding practices mainly contribute to higher-level development of collective identities with increased neighborhood capacities. Although participation in such ICT-enabled interaction interfaces could reinforce digital inequalities and existing power balances, this research shows a more nuanced perspective, in which online and offline practices intertwine. Furthermore, while civic crowdfunding campaigns are driven by a traditional ‘participation elite’, the deliberation process on development projects involves new publics that are not typically engaged in civic activities. Hence, civic crowdfunding formulates a new mode of civic engagement in which institutional involvement acts as a trust broker between civic funders and civic entrepreneurs, as well as adding legitimacy to innovation processes in the public sphere.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Employment of highly-skilled migrants during the pandemic: Focus on internal migration in Indonesia. Editorial: Blockchain and Digital Transformation Can Blockchain Improve Healthcare Management? Interview: Blockchain and Digital Transformation in Financial Services, Part I Coping with the Double-Edged Sword of Data-Sharing in Ecosystems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1