审计署未使用的能力和审计质量

IF 5.5 Q1 MANAGEMENT Asia Pacific Management Review Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.apmrv.2022.07.005
Chun-Chan Yu , Hua-Wei Huang
{"title":"审计署未使用的能力和审计质量","authors":"Chun-Chan Yu ,&nbsp;Hua-Wei Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.apmrv.2022.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While prior studies have linked the relationship between resources, time pressure, and audit quality, prior empirical studies generally measure the notion of audit offices' resources or capacity in relatively simplified, indirect, or context-specific ways. In this study, we use two measures of an audit office's unused capacity pertaining to normal audit tasks in Yu (2018) to examine their associations with several proxies for audit quality (discretionary accruals, earnings benchmarks, and going concern audit opinions). Empirical results show some evidence that higher (lower) unused capacity can result in better (worse) audit quality; and if any, this seems to occur only in Big 4 audit offices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46001,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Management Review","volume":"28 2","pages":"Pages 146-162"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Audit Office's unused capacity and audit quality\",\"authors\":\"Chun-Chan Yu ,&nbsp;Hua-Wei Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apmrv.2022.07.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>While prior studies have linked the relationship between resources, time pressure, and audit quality, prior empirical studies generally measure the notion of audit offices' resources or capacity in relatively simplified, indirect, or context-specific ways. In this study, we use two measures of an audit office's unused capacity pertaining to normal audit tasks in Yu (2018) to examine their associations with several proxies for audit quality (discretionary accruals, earnings benchmarks, and going concern audit opinions). Empirical results show some evidence that higher (lower) unused capacity can result in better (worse) audit quality; and if any, this seems to occur only in Big 4 audit offices.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific Management Review\",\"volume\":\"28 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 146-162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1029313222000379\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1029313222000379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

虽然先前的研究将资源、时间压力和审计质量之间的关系联系起来,但先前的实证研究通常以相对简化、间接或具体情况的方式衡量审计办公室资源或能力的概念。在本研究中,我们在Yu(2018)中使用了审计办公室与正常审计任务相关的未使用能力的两个度量来检查它们与审计质量的几个代理(可支配性应计项目、盈余基准和持续经营审计意见)的关联。实证结果表明,较高(较低)的未使用容量会导致较好的(较差的)审计质量;如果有的话,这种情况似乎只发生在四大审计事务所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Audit Office's unused capacity and audit quality

While prior studies have linked the relationship between resources, time pressure, and audit quality, prior empirical studies generally measure the notion of audit offices' resources or capacity in relatively simplified, indirect, or context-specific ways. In this study, we use two measures of an audit office's unused capacity pertaining to normal audit tasks in Yu (2018) to examine their associations with several proxies for audit quality (discretionary accruals, earnings benchmarks, and going concern audit opinions). Empirical results show some evidence that higher (lower) unused capacity can result in better (worse) audit quality; and if any, this seems to occur only in Big 4 audit offices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Asia Pacific Management Review (APMR), peer-reviewed and published quarterly, pursues to publish original and high quality research articles and notes that contribute to build empirical and theoretical understanding for concerning strategy and management aspects in business and activities. Meanwhile, we also seek to publish short communications and opinions addressing issues of current concern to managers in regards to within and between the Asia-Pacific region. The covered domains but not limited to, such as accounting, finance, marketing, decision analysis and operation management, human resource management, information management, international business management, logistic and supply chain management, quantitative and research methods, strategic and business management, and tourism management, are suitable for publication in the APMR.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board A long short-term memory model for forecasting housing prices in Taiwan in the post-epidemic era through big data analytics Drivers of customer satisfaction with restaurants during COVID-19. A survey of young adults in Taiwan and Indonesia Forecasting vault cash with an extreme value long short-term memory network Integrating technical indicators, chip factors and stock news for enhanced stock price predictions: A multi-kernel approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1