{"title":"地球的偏心在开普勒对第谷论火星问题的反驳中","authors":"Gonzalo Luis Recio","doi":"10.1111/1600-0498.12414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this paper I explain Kepler's procedure for refuting the Ptolemaic-Tychonic approach to the problem of Mars, by using latitudinal observations at Mars's opposition, from Chapter 19 of the <i>Astronomia Nova</i>. This critique is fundamental to his reformation of the foundations of astronomy with his first two laws. Moreover, as I argue, the strategy he follows is deeply rooted in certain rhetorical considerations that he employed during the composition of his work.</p>","PeriodicalId":51282,"journal":{"name":"Centaurus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Earth's eccentricity in Kepler's refutation of the Tychonic approach to the problem of Mars\",\"authors\":\"Gonzalo Luis Recio\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1600-0498.12414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this paper I explain Kepler's procedure for refuting the Ptolemaic-Tychonic approach to the problem of Mars, by using latitudinal observations at Mars's opposition, from Chapter 19 of the <i>Astronomia Nova</i>. This critique is fundamental to his reformation of the foundations of astronomy with his first two laws. Moreover, as I argue, the strategy he follows is deeply rooted in certain rhetorical considerations that he employed during the composition of his work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Centaurus\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Centaurus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1600-0498.12414\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Centaurus","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1600-0498.12414","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Earth's eccentricity in Kepler's refutation of the Tychonic approach to the problem of Mars
In this paper I explain Kepler's procedure for refuting the Ptolemaic-Tychonic approach to the problem of Mars, by using latitudinal observations at Mars's opposition, from Chapter 19 of the Astronomia Nova. This critique is fundamental to his reformation of the foundations of astronomy with his first two laws. Moreover, as I argue, the strategy he follows is deeply rooted in certain rhetorical considerations that he employed during the composition of his work.
期刊介绍：
Centaurus publishes an international spectrum of original research papers, historiographical articles, and other academic content on the history of science in the broadest sense, including mathematics, medicine, biomedical sciences, earth sciences, social sciences, humanities and technology, and their social and cultural aspects. We also invite contributions that build a bridge between history of science and other disciplines. Book notices, book reviews and essay reviews of publications within the journal''s scope are commissioned to experts. The Editor encourages suggestions for special issues, short papers on topics of current interest and articles suited to open peer commentary along with a list of potential commentators.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
