从以色列清除邪恶:申命记在《审判记》20:13中的作用

IF 0.2 2区 哲学 0 RELIGION ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE ALTTESTAMENTLICHE WISSENSCHAFT Pub Date : 2021-11-23 DOI:10.1515/zaw-2021-4002
V. Ber
{"title":"从以色列清除邪恶:申命记在《审判记》20:13中的作用","authors":"V. Ber","doi":"10.1515/zaw-2021-4002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article argues for the importance of the purging formula in Judg 20:13. In the Deuteronomic Code, this formula provides the motivation for capital punishment in two areas relevant to the Judges narrative: first, apostasy and incitement to it, and, second, the perversion of Deuteronomic legal procedures. This study argues that both motifs are present in and important to Judges’ rendering of the Sodom-like outrage in Gibeah. The first is obvious. With regard to the second, the article argues that the Israelites err in their investigation of the case, and therefore their decisions and subsequent action lead to more violence and confusion. It is further argued that the triple oracular inquiry of YHWH in Judg 20:18–28 is presented as an inadequate substitute for proper forensic adjudication; it therefore does not lead to the establishment of order and justice.","PeriodicalId":45627,"journal":{"name":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE ALTTESTAMENTLICHE WISSENSCHAFT","volume":"133 1","pages":"442 - 455"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Purging the Evil from Israel: The Function of the Deuteronomic Formula in Judg 20:13\",\"authors\":\"V. Ber\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/zaw-2021-4002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article argues for the importance of the purging formula in Judg 20:13. In the Deuteronomic Code, this formula provides the motivation for capital punishment in two areas relevant to the Judges narrative: first, apostasy and incitement to it, and, second, the perversion of Deuteronomic legal procedures. This study argues that both motifs are present in and important to Judges’ rendering of the Sodom-like outrage in Gibeah. The first is obvious. With regard to the second, the article argues that the Israelites err in their investigation of the case, and therefore their decisions and subsequent action lead to more violence and confusion. It is further argued that the triple oracular inquiry of YHWH in Judg 20:18–28 is presented as an inadequate substitute for proper forensic adjudication; it therefore does not lead to the establishment of order and justice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE ALTTESTAMENTLICHE WISSENSCHAFT\",\"volume\":\"133 1\",\"pages\":\"442 - 455\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE ALTTESTAMENTLICHE WISSENSCHAFT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/zaw-2021-4002\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE ALTTESTAMENTLICHE WISSENSCHAFT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zaw-2021-4002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文论证了判决书20:13中清除公式的重要性。在《申命记法典》中,这一公式在与法官叙述相关的两个领域提供了死刑的动机:第一,叛教和煽动叛教,第二,对申命记法律程序的曲解。这项研究认为,这两个主题都存在于法官对吉比亚所多玛式暴行的渲染中,并且对其很重要。第一个是显而易见的。关于第二个问题,文章认为,以色列人在调查此案时犯了错误,因此他们的决定和随后的行动导致了更多的暴力和混乱。有人进一步认为,第20:18-28号判决中对YHWH的三重神谕调查不足以替代适当的法医裁决;因此,它不会导致建立秩序和正义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Purging the Evil from Israel: The Function of the Deuteronomic Formula in Judg 20:13
Abstract This article argues for the importance of the purging formula in Judg 20:13. In the Deuteronomic Code, this formula provides the motivation for capital punishment in two areas relevant to the Judges narrative: first, apostasy and incitement to it, and, second, the perversion of Deuteronomic legal procedures. This study argues that both motifs are present in and important to Judges’ rendering of the Sodom-like outrage in Gibeah. The first is obvious. With regard to the second, the article argues that the Israelites err in their investigation of the case, and therefore their decisions and subsequent action lead to more violence and confusion. It is further argued that the triple oracular inquiry of YHWH in Judg 20:18–28 is presented as an inadequate substitute for proper forensic adjudication; it therefore does not lead to the establishment of order and justice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, which is published in four issues of 160 pages each plus supplements, has been the leading international and interconfessional periodical in the field of research in the Old Testament und Early Judaism for over one hundred years. Open to various ways of posing the questions of scholarship, the journal features high quality contributions in English, German, and French. Through its review of periodicals and books, it provides fast and reliable information concerning new publications in the field.
期刊最新文献
The North (ṣāpôn) in the Book of Jeremiah The Nameless Daughter of Saul Job’s Clean Hands: A Proposal for Job 22:30 Zeitschriften- und Bücherschau Wehinne »und da« – Zur erlebten Rede in der Hebräischen Bibel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1