教师期望量表的信度、有效性及其发展研究

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education Pub Date : 2022-09-11 DOI:10.21449/ijate.976585
Hasan İğde, L. Yakar
{"title":"教师期望量表的信度、有效性及其发展研究","authors":"Hasan İğde, L. Yakar","doi":"10.21449/ijate.976585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to develop a ‘Teacher Expectation Scale’ (TES) to accurately and reliably measure teachers' expectations from their students. The development process of TES has an exploratory mixed method research design. The maximum variety sampling method was used when collecting qualitative data for the study, and the simple random sampling method was used for quantitative data. In the study groups of the research, there are 27 teachers for semi-structured interviews, 423 teachers for Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and 750 teachers for Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). For the content and face validity of the scale, six experts' opinions were obtained. A structure consisting of 36 items and 2 factors was revealed, which explains 73.54% of the total variance as a result of EFA. It has been seen that the items contained in TES show high levels of affiliation to the relevant factors and that all items are discriminative. The explored structure with EFA was evaluated using CFA. The following results were obtained when examining the compliance indices of the obtained model: χ²/df=4.53<5; CFI=0.99; TLI=0.99; RMSEA=0.07; SRMR=0.05. From the calculated reliability coefficients, McDonald's Omega (0.98) and stratified alpha coefficient (0.96) for the scale overall and Cronbach alpha coefficient (.98) for the dimensions were obtained. Reliability and validity results, obtained from TES showed that it is a valid and reliable measurement tool with two factors and 36 items. The subject of teacher expectation can be examined in terms of many variables using TES developed in the current research.","PeriodicalId":42417,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A study of reliability, validity and development of the teacher expectation scale\",\"authors\":\"Hasan İğde, L. Yakar\",\"doi\":\"10.21449/ijate.976585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to develop a ‘Teacher Expectation Scale’ (TES) to accurately and reliably measure teachers' expectations from their students. The development process of TES has an exploratory mixed method research design. The maximum variety sampling method was used when collecting qualitative data for the study, and the simple random sampling method was used for quantitative data. In the study groups of the research, there are 27 teachers for semi-structured interviews, 423 teachers for Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and 750 teachers for Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). For the content and face validity of the scale, six experts' opinions were obtained. A structure consisting of 36 items and 2 factors was revealed, which explains 73.54% of the total variance as a result of EFA. It has been seen that the items contained in TES show high levels of affiliation to the relevant factors and that all items are discriminative. The explored structure with EFA was evaluated using CFA. The following results were obtained when examining the compliance indices of the obtained model: χ²/df=4.53<5; CFI=0.99; TLI=0.99; RMSEA=0.07; SRMR=0.05. From the calculated reliability coefficients, McDonald's Omega (0.98) and stratified alpha coefficient (0.96) for the scale overall and Cronbach alpha coefficient (.98) for the dimensions were obtained. Reliability and validity results, obtained from TES showed that it is a valid and reliable measurement tool with two factors and 36 items. The subject of teacher expectation can be examined in terms of many variables using TES developed in the current research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.976585\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.976585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在开发一种“教师期望量表”(TES),以准确可靠地衡量教师对学生的期望。TES的开发过程具有探索性的混合方法研究设计。在收集研究的定性数据时使用了最大方差抽样方法,而定量数据则使用了简单随机抽样方法。在本研究的研究组中,有27名教师进行半结构化访谈,423名教师进行探索性因素分析,750名教师进行验证性因素分析。对于量表的内容和面有效性,共获得六位专家的意见。揭示了由36个项目和2个因素组成的结构,这解释了全民教育结果总方差的73.54%。可以看出,TES中包含的项目与相关因素有很高的相关性,并且所有项目都具有歧视性。使用CFA对探索的全民教育结构进行了评估。在检查所获得的模型的顺应性指数时,获得了以下结果:χ²/df=4.53<5;CFI=0.99;TLI=0.99;RMSEA=0.07;SRMR=0.05。从计算的可靠性系数中,获得了总体量表的McDonald’s Omega(0.98)和分层α系数(0.96)以及维度的Cronbachα系数(.98)。TES的信度和有效性结果表明,它是一种有效可靠的测量工具,包含两个因素和36个项目。教师期望的主题可以使用当前研究中开发的TES从多个变量来检验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A study of reliability, validity and development of the teacher expectation scale
This study aims to develop a ‘Teacher Expectation Scale’ (TES) to accurately and reliably measure teachers' expectations from their students. The development process of TES has an exploratory mixed method research design. The maximum variety sampling method was used when collecting qualitative data for the study, and the simple random sampling method was used for quantitative data. In the study groups of the research, there are 27 teachers for semi-structured interviews, 423 teachers for Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and 750 teachers for Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). For the content and face validity of the scale, six experts' opinions were obtained. A structure consisting of 36 items and 2 factors was revealed, which explains 73.54% of the total variance as a result of EFA. It has been seen that the items contained in TES show high levels of affiliation to the relevant factors and that all items are discriminative. The explored structure with EFA was evaluated using CFA. The following results were obtained when examining the compliance indices of the obtained model: χ²/df=4.53<5; CFI=0.99; TLI=0.99; RMSEA=0.07; SRMR=0.05. From the calculated reliability coefficients, McDonald's Omega (0.98) and stratified alpha coefficient (0.96) for the scale overall and Cronbach alpha coefficient (.98) for the dimensions were obtained. Reliability and validity results, obtained from TES showed that it is a valid and reliable measurement tool with two factors and 36 items. The subject of teacher expectation can be examined in terms of many variables using TES developed in the current research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education
International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
11.10%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
The complexity of the grading system in Turkish higher education Global competence scale: An adaptation to measure pre-service English teachers’ global competences Language Models in Automated Essay Scoring: Insights for the Turkish Language Type I error and power rates: A comparative analysis of techniques in differential item functioning A data pipeline for e-large-scale assessments: Better automation, quality assurance, and efficiency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1