活力社会主义发展的极限:厄瓜多尔2007年至2017年的替代发展模式

IF 0.1 Q4 ECONOMICS History of Economic Thought and Policy Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.3280/spe2022-001003
Aurelio García-García
{"title":"活力社会主义发展的极限:厄瓜多尔2007年至2017年的替代发展模式","authors":"Aurelio García-García","doi":"10.3280/spe2022-001003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2006, the political coalition Alianza PAÍS promoted a \"Citizen's Revolution\" in Ecuador that would put an end to neoliberal policies and lead the country to \"buen vivir\". However, the coalition's arrival to the government and the negotiations of the 2008 Constitution generated fractures and splits within the party. The buen vivir was divided into three trends: Indianist, environmentalist and socialist. The socialist trend became the state representative, although it had huge controversies with the other two trends because it opted for a new post-neoliberal development model, while the indianists and ecologists rejected the continuity of the developmentalist models. This article presents the main characteristics of the three trends of buen vivir. In addition, based on the work The Limits to Growth and through the analysis of socio-economic and environmental indicators, it is shown how the socialist model of buen vivir (2007-2017) was an unsustainable model in the medium and long term.","PeriodicalId":40401,"journal":{"name":"History of Economic Thought and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The limits to growth of buen vivir socialism: Ecuador's alternative development model from 2007 to 2017\",\"authors\":\"Aurelio García-García\",\"doi\":\"10.3280/spe2022-001003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2006, the political coalition Alianza PAÍS promoted a \\\"Citizen's Revolution\\\" in Ecuador that would put an end to neoliberal policies and lead the country to \\\"buen vivir\\\". However, the coalition's arrival to the government and the negotiations of the 2008 Constitution generated fractures and splits within the party. The buen vivir was divided into three trends: Indianist, environmentalist and socialist. The socialist trend became the state representative, although it had huge controversies with the other two trends because it opted for a new post-neoliberal development model, while the indianists and ecologists rejected the continuity of the developmentalist models. This article presents the main characteristics of the three trends of buen vivir. In addition, based on the work The Limits to Growth and through the analysis of socio-economic and environmental indicators, it is shown how the socialist model of buen vivir (2007-2017) was an unsustainable model in the medium and long term.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of Economic Thought and Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of Economic Thought and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3280/spe2022-001003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Economic Thought and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/spe2022-001003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2006年,政治联盟Alianza PAÍS在厄瓜多尔发起了一场“公民革命”,结束了新自由主义政策,并带领国家走向“繁荣”。然而,联合政府的成立和2008年宪法的谈判在党内产生了裂痕和分裂。buen vivir分为三种趋势:印度主义、环保主义和社会主义。社会主义潮流成为了国家的代表,尽管它与其他两种潮流有着巨大的争议,因为它选择了一种新的后新自由主义发展模式,而独立主义者和生态学家拒绝了发展主义模式的连续性。本文介绍了蟾蜍的三大趋势的主要特点。此外,在《增长的极限》一书的基础上,通过对社会经济和环境指标的分析,表明了从中长期来看,buen vivir(2007-2017)的社会主义模式是一种不可持续的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The limits to growth of buen vivir socialism: Ecuador's alternative development model from 2007 to 2017
In 2006, the political coalition Alianza PAÍS promoted a "Citizen's Revolution" in Ecuador that would put an end to neoliberal policies and lead the country to "buen vivir". However, the coalition's arrival to the government and the negotiations of the 2008 Constitution generated fractures and splits within the party. The buen vivir was divided into three trends: Indianist, environmentalist and socialist. The socialist trend became the state representative, although it had huge controversies with the other two trends because it opted for a new post-neoliberal development model, while the indianists and ecologists rejected the continuity of the developmentalist models. This article presents the main characteristics of the three trends of buen vivir. In addition, based on the work The Limits to Growth and through the analysis of socio-economic and environmental indicators, it is shown how the socialist model of buen vivir (2007-2017) was an unsustainable model in the medium and long term.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
How the Cryptocurrency Discourse is Changing: A Textual Analysis The Modernity of Keynesian Thinking on Economic Policy from an Institutional Perspective Richard Lipsey and the "Tyranny" of a Unique Labour Market Equilibrium A Critical Note on Ricardo's views on Absolute and Relative Value in terms of Labor Values New paths in the history of economic thought: A History of European Economic Thought by Antonio Magliulo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1