点到为止:为了音乐家和音乐学家的共同利益,采用更广泛的开放形式

IF 0.6 0 MUSIC Empirical Musicology Review Pub Date : 2021-12-10 DOI:10.18061/emr.v16i1.7644
Mark Gotham
{"title":"点到为止:为了音乐家和音乐学家的共同利益,采用更广泛的开放形式","authors":"Mark Gotham","doi":"10.18061/emr.v16i1.7644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While it is encouraging to see renewed attention to 'openness' in academia, that debate (and its interpretation of the F.A.I.R. principles) is often rather narrowly defined. This paper addresses openness in a broad sense, asking not so much whether a project is open, but how open and to whom. I illustrate these ideas through examples of my own ongoing projects which to seek to make the most of a potential symbiosis between academic and wider musical communities. Specifically, I discuss how these communities can both benefit from – and even work together on building – highly accessible and interoperable corpora of scores and analyses when ambitious openness is factored into decision making from the outset.","PeriodicalId":44128,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Musicology Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Connecting the Dots: Engaging Wider Forms of Openness for the Mutual Benefit of Musicians and Musicologists\",\"authors\":\"Mark Gotham\",\"doi\":\"10.18061/emr.v16i1.7644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While it is encouraging to see renewed attention to 'openness' in academia, that debate (and its interpretation of the F.A.I.R. principles) is often rather narrowly defined. This paper addresses openness in a broad sense, asking not so much whether a project is open, but how open and to whom. I illustrate these ideas through examples of my own ongoing projects which to seek to make the most of a potential symbiosis between academic and wider musical communities. Specifically, I discuss how these communities can both benefit from – and even work together on building – highly accessible and interoperable corpora of scores and analyses when ambitious openness is factored into decision making from the outset.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Empirical Musicology Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Empirical Musicology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18061/emr.v16i1.7644\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Empirical Musicology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18061/emr.v16i1.7644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

虽然看到学术界重新关注“开放性”令人鼓舞,但这场辩论(及其对F.A.I.R.原则的解释)往往定义得相当狭隘。本文讨论了广义的开放性,并不是问一个项目是否开放,而是问如何开放以及对谁开放。我通过我自己正在进行的项目的例子来说明这些想法,这些项目旨在最大限度地利用学术界和更广泛的音乐界之间的潜在共生关系。具体来说,我讨论了当从一开始就将雄心勃勃的开放性考虑到决策中时,这些社区如何既能从高度可访问和可互操作的分数和分析语料库中受益,甚至能够共同构建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Connecting the Dots: Engaging Wider Forms of Openness for the Mutual Benefit of Musicians and Musicologists
While it is encouraging to see renewed attention to 'openness' in academia, that debate (and its interpretation of the F.A.I.R. principles) is often rather narrowly defined. This paper addresses openness in a broad sense, asking not so much whether a project is open, but how open and to whom. I illustrate these ideas through examples of my own ongoing projects which to seek to make the most of a potential symbiosis between academic and wider musical communities. Specifically, I discuss how these communities can both benefit from – and even work together on building – highly accessible and interoperable corpora of scores and analyses when ambitious openness is factored into decision making from the outset.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
The influence of groove on sexual attraction: Evidence for an effect of misattributed arousal in males but not females Editors' Note Mysterium Corpus: The Solo Piano Music of Alexander Scriabin Commentary on Lee and Zaryab: Does groove really influence sexual selection? Presenting the SWTC: A Symbolic Corpus of Themes from John Williams’ Star Wars Episodes I-IX
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1