{"title":"儿童脐疝应用胶带的疗效:队列研究的系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Takuya Sugimoto, Kazunori Tahara, Koshi Uchida, Kazuhiko Yoshimoto","doi":"10.1136/wjps-2023-000633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although adhesive strapping (AS) for pediatric umbilical hernia (UH), which was once obsolete, has been reconsidered as a common practice in Japan, its efficacy is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate its efficacy by reviewing related articles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi via Ichushi-Web was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Cohort studies reporting on the UH closure rate after AS compared with observation-only management were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 cohort studies were included, and the overall UH closure rate was not statistically significant (p=0.31, risk ratio (RR)=0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45 to 1.28). However, there were significant differences in the UH closure rate at the age of 6 months (p<0.01, RR=0.55, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.75) and the efficacy of preventing protruding umbilici with redundant skin (p=0.049, RR=0.16, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the efficacy of AS on UH compared with observation-only management did not differ in terms of the UH closure rate, the application of AS may be effective for faster UH closure and the prevention of protruding umbilici. However, due to the high heterogeneity of the study, further large-scale studies, particularly randomized controlled trials, are warranted to reach a conclusion.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42022314417.</p>","PeriodicalId":23823,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Pediatric Surgery","volume":"6 4","pages":"e000633"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1e/84/wjps-2023-000633.PMC10582974.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of adhesive strapping on umbilical hernia in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.\",\"authors\":\"Takuya Sugimoto, Kazunori Tahara, Koshi Uchida, Kazuhiko Yoshimoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/wjps-2023-000633\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although adhesive strapping (AS) for pediatric umbilical hernia (UH), which was once obsolete, has been reconsidered as a common practice in Japan, its efficacy is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate its efficacy by reviewing related articles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi via Ichushi-Web was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Cohort studies reporting on the UH closure rate after AS compared with observation-only management were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 cohort studies were included, and the overall UH closure rate was not statistically significant (p=0.31, risk ratio (RR)=0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45 to 1.28). However, there were significant differences in the UH closure rate at the age of 6 months (p<0.01, RR=0.55, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.75) and the efficacy of preventing protruding umbilici with redundant skin (p=0.049, RR=0.16, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the efficacy of AS on UH compared with observation-only management did not differ in terms of the UH closure rate, the application of AS may be effective for faster UH closure and the prevention of protruding umbilici. However, due to the high heterogeneity of the study, further large-scale studies, particularly randomized controlled trials, are warranted to reach a conclusion.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42022314417.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Pediatric Surgery\",\"volume\":\"6 4\",\"pages\":\"e000633\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1e/84/wjps-2023-000633.PMC10582974.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Pediatric Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/wjps-2023-000633\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Pediatric Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/wjps-2023-000633","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:尽管粘合带(AS)治疗小儿脐疝(UH)一度过时,但在日本已被重新考虑为一种常见做法,其疗效仍不清楚。本研究旨在通过查阅相关文章来评估其疗效。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目声明,通过Ichushi Web对PubMed、Cochrane、Google Scholar和Igaku Chuo Zasshi进行综合文献检索。纳入了报告AS后UH闭合率与仅观察治疗的队列研究。结果:共纳入10项队列研究,总体UH闭合率无统计学意义(p=0.31,风险比(RR)=0.76,95%置信区间(CI)0.45至1.28)。然而,6个月大时UH闭合率存在显著差异(结论:尽管AS治疗UH的疗效与仅观察治疗相比,在UH闭合率方面没有差异,但应用AS可能对更快的UH闭合和预防脐突有效。然而,由于研究的高度异质性,需要进一步的大规模研究,特别是随机对照试验,以得出结论。)sion。Prospero注册号:CRD42022314417。
Efficacy of adhesive strapping on umbilical hernia in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.
Background: Although adhesive strapping (AS) for pediatric umbilical hernia (UH), which was once obsolete, has been reconsidered as a common practice in Japan, its efficacy is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate its efficacy by reviewing related articles.
Methods: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi via Ichushi-Web was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Cohort studies reporting on the UH closure rate after AS compared with observation-only management were included.
Results: A total of 10 cohort studies were included, and the overall UH closure rate was not statistically significant (p=0.31, risk ratio (RR)=0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45 to 1.28). However, there were significant differences in the UH closure rate at the age of 6 months (p<0.01, RR=0.55, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.75) and the efficacy of preventing protruding umbilici with redundant skin (p=0.049, RR=0.16, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.99).
Conclusions: Although the efficacy of AS on UH compared with observation-only management did not differ in terms of the UH closure rate, the application of AS may be effective for faster UH closure and the prevention of protruding umbilici. However, due to the high heterogeneity of the study, further large-scale studies, particularly randomized controlled trials, are warranted to reach a conclusion.