[德国产科诊所相对指示性的二次剖腹产手术中医疗信息的法律合规性——第二部分:新信息概念]。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-18 DOI:10.1055/a-2183-8781
Alexandra Marina Jaster, Peter Wolfgang Gaidzik, Sven Schiermeier
{"title":"[德国产科诊所相对指示性的二次剖腹产手术中医疗信息的法律合规性——第二部分:新信息概念]。","authors":"Alexandra Marina Jaster, Peter Wolfgang Gaidzik, Sven Schiermeier","doi":"10.1055/a-2183-8781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The avoidance of liability cases for birth defects due to medical information errors is in the urgent interest of obstetric clinics in Germany. The aim of this study throughout Germany was to have a newly developed information concept with regard to the frequent situation of the relatively indicated secondary caesarean section evaluated by the obstetric clinics in Germany as to its usefulness in practice and to analyze response behaviour on a comparative basis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All obstetric clinics in Germany were contacted within the context of an anonymous online study using a specially developed questionnaire and asked to answer 5 questions. The clinics were divided into two comparison groups based on their previous information practices in relation to the use of a general information sheet when registering a birth with a medical information discussion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>93 questionnaires were analyzed. The majority of the clinics (59.14%) attested to the usefulness in practice of the new information algorithm. In the group comparison, there are clear differences in evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In their own interest, the clinic operators should strive to provide their doctors with a legally compliant information concept along with the necessary human and material resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":23854,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Legal Compliance of Medical Information in the Case of a Relatively Indicated Secondary Caesarean Section in Obstetric Clinics in Germany - Part II: New Information Concept].\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Marina Jaster, Peter Wolfgang Gaidzik, Sven Schiermeier\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2183-8781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The avoidance of liability cases for birth defects due to medical information errors is in the urgent interest of obstetric clinics in Germany. The aim of this study throughout Germany was to have a newly developed information concept with regard to the frequent situation of the relatively indicated secondary caesarean section evaluated by the obstetric clinics in Germany as to its usefulness in practice and to analyze response behaviour on a comparative basis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All obstetric clinics in Germany were contacted within the context of an anonymous online study using a specially developed questionnaire and asked to answer 5 questions. The clinics were divided into two comparison groups based on their previous information practices in relation to the use of a general information sheet when registering a birth with a medical information discussion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>93 questionnaires were analyzed. The majority of the clinics (59.14%) attested to the usefulness in practice of the new information algorithm. In the group comparison, there are clear differences in evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In their own interest, the clinic operators should strive to provide their doctors with a legally compliant information concept along with the necessary human and material resources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2183-8781\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2183-8781","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:避免因医疗信息错误导致出生缺陷的责任案件符合德国产科诊所的迫切利益。这项研究的目的是在德国各地建立一个新的信息概念,了解德国产科诊所对相对指示的二次剖腹产的常见情况进行评估,了解其在实践中的有用性,并在比较的基础上分析反应行为。方法:在一项匿名在线研究的背景下,使用一份专门开发的问卷,联系了德国所有产科诊所,并要求他们回答5个问题。根据他们以前在医疗信息讨论中登记出生时使用一般信息表的信息做法,诊所被分为两个比较组。结果:对93份调查问卷进行了分析。大多数诊所(59.14%)证明了新信息算法在实践中的有用性。在分组比较中,评价存在明显差异。结论:为了自身利益,诊所经营者应努力为医生提供合法的信息概念以及必要的人力和物力资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Legal Compliance of Medical Information in the Case of a Relatively Indicated Secondary Caesarean Section in Obstetric Clinics in Germany - Part II: New Information Concept].

Introduction: The avoidance of liability cases for birth defects due to medical information errors is in the urgent interest of obstetric clinics in Germany. The aim of this study throughout Germany was to have a newly developed information concept with regard to the frequent situation of the relatively indicated secondary caesarean section evaluated by the obstetric clinics in Germany as to its usefulness in practice and to analyze response behaviour on a comparative basis.

Methods: All obstetric clinics in Germany were contacted within the context of an anonymous online study using a specially developed questionnaire and asked to answer 5 questions. The clinics were divided into two comparison groups based on their previous information practices in relation to the use of a general information sheet when registering a birth with a medical information discussion.

Results: 93 questionnaires were analyzed. The majority of the clinics (59.14%) attested to the usefulness in practice of the new information algorithm. In the group comparison, there are clear differences in evaluation.

Conclusion: In their own interest, the clinic operators should strive to provide their doctors with a legally compliant information concept along with the necessary human and material resources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie
Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gynäkologen, Geburtshelfer, Hebammen, Neonatologen, Pädiater
期刊最新文献
[AI-supported decision-making in obstetrics - a feasibility study on the medical accuracy and reliability of ChatGPT]. [Survey on the State, Potential, and Obstacles of the Digital Transformation in Human Milk Banks]. Rare Diseases and Syndromes Observed in Newborn Babies with Idiopathic Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis. [Ethical Attitudes and Handling in Prenatal Conflict Situations - A Survey among Obstetricians and Prenatal Diagnosticians in Germany]. Significance of Physical Exercise in Pregnancy: Comparison of Short and Long Exercise Programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1