“谁带狗,谁就有房子”:老年人如何为多物种的家庭健康和福祉谈判、预算和部署资源。

IF 1.1 Q3 SOCIAL WORK Social Work in Mental Health Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-15 DOI:10.1080/15332985.2023.2265005
Jennifer W Applebaum, Carlyn Ellison
{"title":"“谁带狗,谁就有房子”:老年人如何为多物种的家庭健康和福祉谈判、预算和部署资源。","authors":"Jennifer W Applebaum, Carlyn Ellison","doi":"10.1080/15332985.2023.2265005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we interrogate the ways that older adult pet owners exercise their agency within the limits of their social statuses to allocate their resources for the management of the health needs of their multispecies families. Guided by fundamental cause theory, we consider how the participants' memberships in socially constructed categories can impact their experiences with household health management. We conducted focus groups with 30 community-dwelling older adults who owned pets. Using a thematic analytic approach, we found that the participants' bonds with their pets led them to negotiate priorities and make concessions for the benefit of the household.</p>","PeriodicalId":46241,"journal":{"name":"Social Work in Mental Health","volume":"21 6","pages":"757-783"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10583862/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Whoever takes the dog gets the house\\\": How older adults negotiate, budget, and deploy resources for multispecies family health and well-being.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer W Applebaum, Carlyn Ellison\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15332985.2023.2265005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this study, we interrogate the ways that older adult pet owners exercise their agency within the limits of their social statuses to allocate their resources for the management of the health needs of their multispecies families. Guided by fundamental cause theory, we consider how the participants' memberships in socially constructed categories can impact their experiences with household health management. We conducted focus groups with 30 community-dwelling older adults who owned pets. Using a thematic analytic approach, we found that the participants' bonds with their pets led them to negotiate priorities and make concessions for the benefit of the household.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Work in Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"21 6\",\"pages\":\"757-783\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10583862/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Work in Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15332985.2023.2265005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Work in Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15332985.2023.2265005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,我们询问了老年宠物主人在其社会地位范围内行使其代理权的方式,以分配资源来管理其多种族家庭的健康需求。在基本原因理论的指导下,我们考虑了参与者在社会构建类别中的成员身份如何影响他们的家庭健康管理体验。我们对30名拥有宠物的社区老年人进行了焦点小组讨论。使用主题分析方法,我们发现参与者与宠物的关系促使他们协商优先事项并做出让步,以造福家庭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"Whoever takes the dog gets the house": How older adults negotiate, budget, and deploy resources for multispecies family health and well-being.

In this study, we interrogate the ways that older adult pet owners exercise their agency within the limits of their social statuses to allocate their resources for the management of the health needs of their multispecies families. Guided by fundamental cause theory, we consider how the participants' memberships in socially constructed categories can impact their experiences with household health management. We conducted focus groups with 30 community-dwelling older adults who owned pets. Using a thematic analytic approach, we found that the participants' bonds with their pets led them to negotiate priorities and make concessions for the benefit of the household.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Social Work in Mental Health is an exciting contribution from the editors of our highly respected journal, Social Work in Health Care. This journal offers quality articles on clinical practice, education, research, collaborative relationships, mental health policy, and the delivery of mental health care services. This scholarly, creative, and lively journal presents material valuable to social workers in all sectors of mental health care. It is devoted to social work theory, practice, and administration in a wide variety of mental health care settings. Social Work in Mental Health will help you improve your practice in these areas, demonstrating the vital role of social services in mental health care delivery systems.
期刊最新文献
Emotional well-being among community mental health professionals during COVID-19: an exploratory study Supporting care providers through a holistic telehealth intervention: a mixed methods evaluation of the Integrative Touch TeleWellness program Sexual violence, suicide, depression, self-esteem, and satisfaction with life among university students in Spain with a gender perspective: implications for social work Markings: a photo essay Ecosocial work: environmental practice and advocacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1