术前和术后KRAS突变循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)在切除的胰腺导管腺癌中的预后作用:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Surgical Oncology-Oxford Pub Date : 2023-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.suronc.2023.102007
Ali Alqahtani , Abdurahman Alloghbi , Philip Coffin , Chao Yin , Reetu Mukherji , Benjamin A. Weinberg
{"title":"术前和术后KRAS突变循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)在切除的胰腺导管腺癌中的预后作用:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ali Alqahtani ,&nbsp;Abdurahman Alloghbi ,&nbsp;Philip Coffin ,&nbsp;Chao Yin ,&nbsp;Reetu Mukherji ,&nbsp;Benjamin A. Weinberg","doi":"10.1016/j.suronc.2023.102007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a challenging disease, with surgery being the only possible cure. However, despite surgery, the majority of patients experience recurrence. Recent evidence suggests that perioperative </span><em>KRAS</em><span><span>-mutated circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may have prognostic value. Therefore, we conducted a </span>systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the prognostic significance of preoperative and postoperative </span><em>KRAS</em>-mutated ctDNA testing in resected PDAC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for studies that reported the effect of preoperative and postoperative <em>KRAS</em>-mutated ctDNA on overall survival (OS) and/or relapse-free survival (RFS) in resected PDAC. We used a random-effects model to determine the pooled OS and RFS hazard ratios (HR) and their corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CI).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 15 studies (868 patients) eligible for analysis. In the preoperative setting, positive ctDNA correlated with worse RFS in 8 studies (HR, 2.067; 95 % CI, 1.346–3.174, P &lt; 0.001) and worse OS in 10 studies (HR, 2.170; 95 % CI, 1.451–3.245, P &lt; 0.001) compared to negative ctDNA. In the postoperative setting, positive ctDNA correlated with worse RFS across 9 studies (HR, 3.32; 95 % CI, 2.19–5.03, P &lt; 0.001) and worse OS in 6 studies (HR, 6.62; 95 % CI, 2.18–20.16, P &lt; 0.001) compared to negative ctDNA.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our meta-analysis supports the utility of preoperative and postoperative <em>KRAS</em>-mutated ctDNA testing as a prognostic marker for resected PDAC. Further controlled studies are warranted to confirm these results and to investigate the potential therapeutic implications of positive <em>KRAS</em>-mutated ctDNA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51185,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic utility of preoperative and postoperative KRAS-mutated circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Ali Alqahtani ,&nbsp;Abdurahman Alloghbi ,&nbsp;Philip Coffin ,&nbsp;Chao Yin ,&nbsp;Reetu Mukherji ,&nbsp;Benjamin A. Weinberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.suronc.2023.102007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a challenging disease, with surgery being the only possible cure. However, despite surgery, the majority of patients experience recurrence. Recent evidence suggests that perioperative </span><em>KRAS</em><span><span>-mutated circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may have prognostic value. Therefore, we conducted a </span>systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the prognostic significance of preoperative and postoperative </span><em>KRAS</em>-mutated ctDNA testing in resected PDAC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for studies that reported the effect of preoperative and postoperative <em>KRAS</em>-mutated ctDNA on overall survival (OS) and/or relapse-free survival (RFS) in resected PDAC. We used a random-effects model to determine the pooled OS and RFS hazard ratios (HR) and their corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CI).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 15 studies (868 patients) eligible for analysis. In the preoperative setting, positive ctDNA correlated with worse RFS in 8 studies (HR, 2.067; 95 % CI, 1.346–3.174, P &lt; 0.001) and worse OS in 10 studies (HR, 2.170; 95 % CI, 1.451–3.245, P &lt; 0.001) compared to negative ctDNA. In the postoperative setting, positive ctDNA correlated with worse RFS across 9 studies (HR, 3.32; 95 % CI, 2.19–5.03, P &lt; 0.001) and worse OS in 6 studies (HR, 6.62; 95 % CI, 2.18–20.16, P &lt; 0.001) compared to negative ctDNA.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our meta-analysis supports the utility of preoperative and postoperative <em>KRAS</em>-mutated ctDNA testing as a prognostic marker for resected PDAC. Further controlled studies are warranted to confirm these results and to investigate the potential therapeutic implications of positive <em>KRAS</em>-mutated ctDNA.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Oncology-Oxford\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Oncology-Oxford\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096074042300107X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096074042300107X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)是一种具有挑战性的疾病,手术是唯一可能的治疗方法。然而,尽管进行了手术,大多数患者仍会复发。最近的证据表明,围手术期KRAS突变的循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)可能具有预后价值。因此,我们进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,以探讨术前和术后KRAS突变ctDNA检测在切除PDAC中的预后意义,以及Cochrane对照试验中央登记数据库,用于报告术前和术后KRAS突变ctDNA对切除PDAC的总生存率(OS)和/或无复发生存率(RFS)的影响的研究。我们使用随机效应模型来确定合并OS和RFS风险比(HR)及其相应的95%置信区间(CI)。结果:我们确定了15项研究(868名患者)符合分析条件。在术前设置中,8项研究中ctDNA阳性与较差RFS相关(HR,2.067;95%CI,1.346-3.174,P结论:我们的荟萃分析支持术前和术后KRAS突变ctDNA检测作为切除PDAC的预后标志物的实用性。需要进一步的对照研究来证实这些结果,并研究KRAS突变阳性ctDNA的潜在治疗意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prognostic utility of preoperative and postoperative KRAS-mutated circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a challenging disease, with surgery being the only possible cure. However, despite surgery, the majority of patients experience recurrence. Recent evidence suggests that perioperative KRAS-mutated circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may have prognostic value. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the prognostic significance of preoperative and postoperative KRAS-mutated ctDNA testing in resected PDAC.

Methods

We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for studies that reported the effect of preoperative and postoperative KRAS-mutated ctDNA on overall survival (OS) and/or relapse-free survival (RFS) in resected PDAC. We used a random-effects model to determine the pooled OS and RFS hazard ratios (HR) and their corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CI).

Results

We identified 15 studies (868 patients) eligible for analysis. In the preoperative setting, positive ctDNA correlated with worse RFS in 8 studies (HR, 2.067; 95 % CI, 1.346–3.174, P < 0.001) and worse OS in 10 studies (HR, 2.170; 95 % CI, 1.451–3.245, P < 0.001) compared to negative ctDNA. In the postoperative setting, positive ctDNA correlated with worse RFS across 9 studies (HR, 3.32; 95 % CI, 2.19–5.03, P < 0.001) and worse OS in 6 studies (HR, 6.62; 95 % CI, 2.18–20.16, P < 0.001) compared to negative ctDNA.

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis supports the utility of preoperative and postoperative KRAS-mutated ctDNA testing as a prognostic marker for resected PDAC. Further controlled studies are warranted to confirm these results and to investigate the potential therapeutic implications of positive KRAS-mutated ctDNA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical Oncology-Oxford
Surgical Oncology-Oxford 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
169
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Surgical Oncology is a peer reviewed journal publishing review articles that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in surgical oncology and related fields of interest. Articles represent a spectrum of current technology in oncology research as well as those concerning clinical trials, surgical technique, methods of investigation and patient evaluation. Surgical Oncology publishes comprehensive Reviews that examine individual topics in considerable detail, in addition to editorials and commentaries which focus on selected papers. The journal also publishes special issues which explore topics of interest to surgical oncologists in great detail - outlining recent advancements and providing readers with the most up to date information.
期刊最新文献
Advances in the management of regionally metastatic melanoma Safe and beneficial outcomes of pancreaticogastrostomy with endoscopic transgastric drainage for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy “Prepectoral tissue expanders without mesh as a bridge to delayed autologous breast reconstruction: Experience at a single academic center” Editorial Board Oncologic and functional outcomes following robot assisted radical prostatectomy: 15-Year experience in a Latin American referral center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1