3D打印树脂外科夹板在口腔中使用安全吗?一项体外比较研究

Yang Sha , Bernadette Quah , Timothy Jie Han Sng , Chee Weng Yong , Intekhab Islam , Raymond Chung Wen Wong
{"title":"3D打印树脂外科夹板在口腔中使用安全吗?一项体外比较研究","authors":"Yang Sha ,&nbsp;Bernadette Quah ,&nbsp;Timothy Jie Han Sng ,&nbsp;Chee Weng Yong ,&nbsp;Intekhab Islam ,&nbsp;Raymond Chung Wen Wong","doi":"10.1016/j.stlm.2022.100097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In orthognathic surgery, surgical splints made of polymethymethacrylate or its variants are used to position the jaws before osteofixation, and occasionally left in-situ for a short duration to guide the occlusion postoperatively. However, allergic reactions can be caused by unreacted dental resin (monomers). Computer aided design/Computer Aided Manufacturing (CADCAM) surgical splints are now more commonly used than the conventionally “handmade” splints. It is unclear if these splints contain uncured residual monomers in any detectable quantity.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>CADCAM surgical splints were made from 2 commonly used resins and compared with splints made manually with autopolymerising resin. The splints were immersed in saline at 37°C for 2 weeks to simulate use in the mouth, and the contents were analysed for uncured resin leaching with High Power Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) at different time intervals.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Uncured resin content was higher in the conventionally made splint (15,246µg/L on Day 1, 13,539 µg/L on Day 7, and 6,203µg/L on Day 14). One of the CADCAM resins had undetectable monomer quantities, while the other CADCAM resin demonstrated significantly less free monomer compared to the autopolymerising resin (382 µg/L on Day 1, 179 µg/L on Day 7 and 65.2 µg/L on Day 14).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>CADCAM surgical splints have much lower free monomer content compared to the conventionally made splint, and are safe for clinical use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72210,"journal":{"name":"Annals of 3D printed medicine","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100097"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are 3D printed resin surgical splints safe to use in the mouth? A comparative in vitro study\",\"authors\":\"Yang Sha ,&nbsp;Bernadette Quah ,&nbsp;Timothy Jie Han Sng ,&nbsp;Chee Weng Yong ,&nbsp;Intekhab Islam ,&nbsp;Raymond Chung Wen Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.stlm.2022.100097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In orthognathic surgery, surgical splints made of polymethymethacrylate or its variants are used to position the jaws before osteofixation, and occasionally left in-situ for a short duration to guide the occlusion postoperatively. However, allergic reactions can be caused by unreacted dental resin (monomers). Computer aided design/Computer Aided Manufacturing (CADCAM) surgical splints are now more commonly used than the conventionally “handmade” splints. It is unclear if these splints contain uncured residual monomers in any detectable quantity.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>CADCAM surgical splints were made from 2 commonly used resins and compared with splints made manually with autopolymerising resin. The splints were immersed in saline at 37°C for 2 weeks to simulate use in the mouth, and the contents were analysed for uncured resin leaching with High Power Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) at different time intervals.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Uncured resin content was higher in the conventionally made splint (15,246µg/L on Day 1, 13,539 µg/L on Day 7, and 6,203µg/L on Day 14). One of the CADCAM resins had undetectable monomer quantities, while the other CADCAM resin demonstrated significantly less free monomer compared to the autopolymerising resin (382 µg/L on Day 1, 179 µg/L on Day 7 and 65.2 µg/L on Day 14).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>CADCAM surgical splints have much lower free monomer content compared to the conventionally made splint, and are safe for clinical use.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of 3D printed medicine\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100097\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of 3D printed medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666964122000510\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of 3D printed medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666964122000510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言在正颌外科中,由聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯或其变体制成的手术夹板在骨固定前用于定位颌骨,偶尔也会在原位放置短时间,以指导术后的咬合。然而,过敏反应可由未反应的牙科树脂(单体)引起。计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CADCAM)手术夹板现在比传统的“手工”夹板更常用。目前尚不清楚这些夹板是否含有任何可检测量的未固化残余单体。材料和方法用2种常用树脂制作ADCAM手术夹板,并与用自聚合树脂手工制作的夹板进行比较。将夹板在37°C的盐水中浸泡2周,以模拟在口腔中使用,并在不同时间间隔用高效液相色谱法(HPLC)分析内含物的未固化树脂浸出情况。结果传统夹板中未固化树脂含量较高(第1天为15246µg/L,第7天为13539µg/L,而第14天为6203µg/L)。其中一种CADCAM树脂的单体含量无法检测,而另一种CADCAM-树脂的游离单体含量与自聚合树脂相比明显减少(第1天为382µg/L,第7天为179µg/L,14天为65.2µg/L)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are 3D printed resin surgical splints safe to use in the mouth? A comparative in vitro study

Introduction

In orthognathic surgery, surgical splints made of polymethymethacrylate or its variants are used to position the jaws before osteofixation, and occasionally left in-situ for a short duration to guide the occlusion postoperatively. However, allergic reactions can be caused by unreacted dental resin (monomers). Computer aided design/Computer Aided Manufacturing (CADCAM) surgical splints are now more commonly used than the conventionally “handmade” splints. It is unclear if these splints contain uncured residual monomers in any detectable quantity.

Materials and methods

CADCAM surgical splints were made from 2 commonly used resins and compared with splints made manually with autopolymerising resin. The splints were immersed in saline at 37°C for 2 weeks to simulate use in the mouth, and the contents were analysed for uncured resin leaching with High Power Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) at different time intervals.

Results

Uncured resin content was higher in the conventionally made splint (15,246µg/L on Day 1, 13,539 µg/L on Day 7, and 6,203µg/L on Day 14). One of the CADCAM resins had undetectable monomer quantities, while the other CADCAM resin demonstrated significantly less free monomer compared to the autopolymerising resin (382 µg/L on Day 1, 179 µg/L on Day 7 and 65.2 µg/L on Day 14).

Conclusion

CADCAM surgical splints have much lower free monomer content compared to the conventionally made splint, and are safe for clinical use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of 3D printed medicine
Annals of 3D printed medicine Medicine and Dentistry (General), Materials Science (General)
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
131 days
期刊最新文献
Voluminous fronto-parietal osteomas: Guided resection with patient-specific cutting guides and reconstruction with a 3D printed hydroxyapatite implant A bibliometric analysis of publications in 3D printing in surgery from the web of science database Scalable direct manufacturing of a functional multipurpose wrist-hand orthosis using 3D printing Multi-resin 3D printing of radiopaque customized artificial tooth for revolutionizing preclinical training on root canal treatment Pelvic osteotomies for correction of sagittal imbalance of the spine: An in-silico study comparing four different osteotomies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1