研究对心理学和其他社会和行为科学的挑战和制约的制度影响

IF 2.3 3区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2023.101014

David M. Sanbonmatsu , E. Hanna Cooley , Steven S. Posavac

引用次数: 0

摘要

心理学和其他社会和行为学科受到研究现象异常复杂以及众多法律、伦理和后勤限制的严重限制。在这篇文章中，我们考察了这些研究挑战对我们学科的制度地位和支持的影响。人类研究的巨大挑战导致了对社会和行为科学家能力的不利刻板印象，并助长了对我们领域的自我谴责。对研究问题、框架和方法的共识不足，以及对研究局限性的失望，导致社会学和人类学等学科支离破碎。众多的障碍和障碍导致了社会科学和行为科学的从属地位，这种从属地位通过有利于自然科学的政策、实践、意识形态和刻板印象得以维持。心理学家和其他社会和行为科学家需要认识到研究现象的复杂性给他们的研究事业带来的局限性，并停止贬低他们的工作。此外，他们需要认识到冲突和分裂的可能性，因为我们领域的共识很低，并采取集体行动促进社会和行为科学。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

The institutional impact of research challenges and constraints on psychology and other social and behavioral sciences

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

New Ideas in Psychology Multiple-

CiteScore

4.80

自引率

3.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： New Ideas in Psychology is a journal for theoretical psychology in its broadest sense. We are looking for new and seminal ideas, from within Psychology and from other fields that have something to bring to Psychology. We welcome presentations and criticisms of theory, of background metaphysics, and of fundamental issues of method, both empirical and conceptual. We put special emphasis on the need for informed discussion of psychological theories to be interdisciplinary. Empirical papers are accepted at New Ideas in Psychology, but only as long as they focus on conceptual issues and are theoretically creative. We are also open to comments or debate, interviews, and book reviews.

期刊最新文献

Psychiatrization in Czech lexical data: Everyday adjectives are acquiring clinical connotations Editorial Board What happens to representatives during family constellations? Attempts at explanation and comparison with other difficult-to-explain phenomena Re-enchanting mirror neurons through lexical changes Actions Speak Louder than outcomes leading to ineffective altruism