对于Twitter的机器人问题,我们应该保留各自的意见吗?

Q1 Social Sciences Online Social Networks and Media Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.osnem.2023.100263
Onur Varol
{"title":"对于Twitter的机器人问题,我们应该保留各自的意见吗?","authors":"Onur Varol","doi":"10.1016/j.osnem.2023.100263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Bots, simply defined as accounts controlled by automation, can be used as a weapon for online manipulation and pose a threat to the health of platforms. Researchers have studied online platforms to detect, estimate, and characterize bot accounts. Concerns about the prevalence of bots were raised following Elon Musk’s bid to acquire Twitter. In this work, we want to stress that crucial questions need to be answered in order to make a proper estimation and compare different methodologies and definitions based on behaviors and activities; otherwise the real questions concerning the health of online platforms will be confounded by disagreements about definitions and models. We argue how assumptions on bot-likely behavior, the detection approach, and the population inspected can affect the estimation of the percentage of bots on Twitter. Finally, we emphasize the responsibility of platforms to be vigilant, transparent, and unbiased in dealing with threats that may affect their users.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52228,"journal":{"name":"Online Social Networks and Media","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Should we agree to disagree about Twitter’s bot problem?\",\"authors\":\"Onur Varol\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.osnem.2023.100263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Bots, simply defined as accounts controlled by automation, can be used as a weapon for online manipulation and pose a threat to the health of platforms. Researchers have studied online platforms to detect, estimate, and characterize bot accounts. Concerns about the prevalence of bots were raised following Elon Musk’s bid to acquire Twitter. In this work, we want to stress that crucial questions need to be answered in order to make a proper estimation and compare different methodologies and definitions based on behaviors and activities; otherwise the real questions concerning the health of online platforms will be confounded by disagreements about definitions and models. We argue how assumptions on bot-likely behavior, the detection approach, and the population inspected can affect the estimation of the percentage of bots on Twitter. Finally, we emphasize the responsibility of platforms to be vigilant, transparent, and unbiased in dealing with threats that may affect their users.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Online Social Networks and Media\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Online Social Networks and Media\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468696423000228\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Social Networks and Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468696423000228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机器人,简单地定义为由自动化控制的账户,可以被用作在线操纵的武器,并对平台的健康构成威胁。研究人员研究了在线平台来检测、估计和表征机器人账户。埃隆·马斯克(Elon Musk)收购推特(Twitter)后,引发了人们对机器人盛行的担忧。在这项工作中,我们想强调的是,为了做出正确的估计,并比较基于行为和活动的不同方法和定义,需要回答关键问题;否则,有关在线平台健康状况的真正问题将被定义和模型的分歧所混淆。我们讨论了对机器人可能行为、检测方法和检测人群的假设如何影响推特上机器人百分比的估计。最后,我们强调平台有责任在应对可能影响其用户的威胁时保持警惕、透明和公正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Should we agree to disagree about Twitter’s bot problem?

Bots, simply defined as accounts controlled by automation, can be used as a weapon for online manipulation and pose a threat to the health of platforms. Researchers have studied online platforms to detect, estimate, and characterize bot accounts. Concerns about the prevalence of bots were raised following Elon Musk’s bid to acquire Twitter. In this work, we want to stress that crucial questions need to be answered in order to make a proper estimation and compare different methodologies and definitions based on behaviors and activities; otherwise the real questions concerning the health of online platforms will be confounded by disagreements about definitions and models. We argue how assumptions on bot-likely behavior, the detection approach, and the population inspected can affect the estimation of the percentage of bots on Twitter. Finally, we emphasize the responsibility of platforms to be vigilant, transparent, and unbiased in dealing with threats that may affect their users.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Online Social Networks and Media
Online Social Networks and Media Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
44 days
期刊最新文献
How does user-generated content on Social Media affect stock predictions? A case study on GameStop Measuring centralization of online platforms through size and interconnection of communities Crowdsourcing the Mitigation of disinformation and misinformation: The case of spontaneous community-based moderation on Reddit GASCOM: Graph-based Attentive Semantic Context Modeling for Online Conversation Understanding The influence of coordinated behavior on toxicity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1