美国心理学会针对男性和男孩的实践指南:它们对男性心理健康是有害的，而不是有益的?

IF 2.3 3区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2022.100984

Christopher J. Ferguson

引用次数: 4

摘要

美国心理协会（APA）的《男性和男孩实践指南》于2018年推出，旨在为从业者在看男性患者时提供有用的指导。这遵循了其他实践的传统和针对特定身份人群的临床工作的临床指南。然而，针对男性和男孩的实践指南很快就引起了争议，因为人们担心该指南贬低了男性和男孩，尤其是那些具有传统价值观的男性和男孩。该指南试图强加进步或女权主义的性别规范和意识形态，而不是继续关注临床健康和同理心。这项审查发现，尽管这些指导方针是本着诚意提出的，但许多批评可能是有效的。具体而言，该指南没有承认生物学对性别影响的重要证据（例如，荷尔蒙和下丘脑对性别认同和性别行为的影响），无意中贬低了传统男性和家庭，与特定的社会文化叙事过于紧密，缺乏不支持这些叙事的数据。结论是，人们有理由担心，目前的指导方针可能会劝阻传统男性和家庭寻求咨询，弊大于利。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

The American psychological Association's practice guidelines for men and boys: Are they hurting rather than helping male mental wellness?

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

New Ideas in Psychology Multiple-

CiteScore

4.80

自引率

3.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： New Ideas in Psychology is a journal for theoretical psychology in its broadest sense. We are looking for new and seminal ideas, from within Psychology and from other fields that have something to bring to Psychology. We welcome presentations and criticisms of theory, of background metaphysics, and of fundamental issues of method, both empirical and conceptual. We put special emphasis on the need for informed discussion of psychological theories to be interdisciplinary. Empirical papers are accepted at New Ideas in Psychology, but only as long as they focus on conceptual issues and are theoretically creative. We are also open to comments or debate, interviews, and book reviews.

期刊最新文献

Psychiatrization in Czech lexical data: Everyday adjectives are acquiring clinical connotations Editorial Board What happens to representatives during family constellations? Attempts at explanation and comparison with other difficult-to-explain phenomena Re-enchanting mirror neurons through lexical changes Actions Speak Louder than outcomes leading to ineffective altruism