近地轨道碰撞风险评估和管理方面的差距审查和改进途径

IF 1 Q3 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE Journal of Space Safety Engineering Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jsse.2023.07.003
Romain Buchs , Marie-Valentine Florin , Emmanuelle David , Jean-Paul Kneib
{"title":"近地轨道碰撞风险评估和管理方面的差距审查和改进途径","authors":"Romain Buchs ,&nbsp;Marie-Valentine Florin ,&nbsp;Emmanuelle David ,&nbsp;Jean-Paul Kneib","doi":"10.1016/j.jsse.2023.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is growing concern that collision risk in low Earth orbit is inadequately managed, necessitating new strategies. Based on discussions held at a multistakeholder workshop organized by EPFL in May 2021, this paper presents some challenges, or governance deficits, in the assessment and management of collision risk, and offers some paths for improvements in both domains. Addressing the governance deficits will require enhanced collaboration between states and between public and private actors.</p><p>While there is a need to improve risk assessment and conduct thorough cost-benefit analyses of management strategies, achieving a complete picture is elusive, given the complexity of the problem and the range of response strategies available. However, the lack of a complete picture should not be a reason to postpone action, as sufficient information to make decisions regarding some management policies is available. Adopting a multidimensional approach and focusing on measures that have the potential for rapid improvements would help secure stakeholder buy-in and lay the groundwork for pursuing strategies that will likely be the most cost-effective in the longer term.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37283,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Space Safety Engineering","volume":"10 3","pages":"Pages 374-383"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gaps review and improvement pathways in the assessment and management of collision risk in low Earth orbit\",\"authors\":\"Romain Buchs ,&nbsp;Marie-Valentine Florin ,&nbsp;Emmanuelle David ,&nbsp;Jean-Paul Kneib\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsse.2023.07.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>There is growing concern that collision risk in low Earth orbit is inadequately managed, necessitating new strategies. Based on discussions held at a multistakeholder workshop organized by EPFL in May 2021, this paper presents some challenges, or governance deficits, in the assessment and management of collision risk, and offers some paths for improvements in both domains. Addressing the governance deficits will require enhanced collaboration between states and between public and private actors.</p><p>While there is a need to improve risk assessment and conduct thorough cost-benefit analyses of management strategies, achieving a complete picture is elusive, given the complexity of the problem and the range of response strategies available. However, the lack of a complete picture should not be a reason to postpone action, as sufficient information to make decisions regarding some management policies is available. Adopting a multidimensional approach and focusing on measures that have the potential for rapid improvements would help secure stakeholder buy-in and lay the groundwork for pursuing strategies that will likely be the most cost-effective in the longer term.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Space Safety Engineering\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 374-383\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Space Safety Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468896723000654\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Space Safety Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468896723000654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们越来越担心近地轨道上的碰撞风险管理不足,因此需要采取新的战略。基于2021年5月EPFL组织的多方利益相关者研讨会上的讨论,本文提出了碰撞风险评估和管理方面的一些挑战或治理缺陷,并为这两个领域的改进提供了一些途径。解决治理赤字需要加强国家之间以及公共和私人行为者之间的合作。尽管有必要改进风险评估,并对管理战略进行彻底的成本效益分析,但鉴于问题的复杂性和可用的应对战略的范围,要想全面了解情况是很难的。然而,缺乏完整的情况不应成为推迟行动的理由,因为有足够的信息可以就某些管理政策作出决定。采取多层面的方法,并将重点放在有可能快速改进的措施上,将有助于确保利益相关者的认可,并为追求可能是长期最具成本效益的战略奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gaps review and improvement pathways in the assessment and management of collision risk in low Earth orbit

There is growing concern that collision risk in low Earth orbit is inadequately managed, necessitating new strategies. Based on discussions held at a multistakeholder workshop organized by EPFL in May 2021, this paper presents some challenges, or governance deficits, in the assessment and management of collision risk, and offers some paths for improvements in both domains. Addressing the governance deficits will require enhanced collaboration between states and between public and private actors.

While there is a need to improve risk assessment and conduct thorough cost-benefit analyses of management strategies, achieving a complete picture is elusive, given the complexity of the problem and the range of response strategies available. However, the lack of a complete picture should not be a reason to postpone action, as sufficient information to make decisions regarding some management policies is available. Adopting a multidimensional approach and focusing on measures that have the potential for rapid improvements would help secure stakeholder buy-in and lay the groundwork for pursuing strategies that will likely be the most cost-effective in the longer term.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Space Safety Engineering
Journal of Space Safety Engineering Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board An economic indicator of the orbital debris environment Adaptive relative orbit control considering laser ablation uncertainty Post mission disposal of Megha-Tropiques-1 through controlled atmospheric Re-entry to be published in: The journal of space safety engineering Development of ballistic limit equations in support of the Mars sample return mission
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1