ChatGPT好得吓人吗?用户动机如何影响对生成式人工智能的恐惧和信任

IF 7.6 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Telematics and Informatics Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tele.2023.102030
Tae Hyun Baek , Minseong Kim
{"title":"ChatGPT好得吓人吗?用户动机如何影响对生成式人工智能的恐惧和信任","authors":"Tae Hyun Baek ,&nbsp;Minseong Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.tele.2023.102030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Few studies have examined user motivations to use generative artificial intelligence (AI). This research aims to address this gap by examining how user motivations for ChatGPT usage affect perceived creepiness, trust, and the intention to continue using AI chatbot technology. The findings of an online survey (N = 421) reveal a negative relationship between personalization and creepiness, while task efficiency and social interaction are positively associated with creepiness. Increased levels of creepiness, in turn, result in decreased continuance intention. Furthermore, task efficiency and personalization have a positive impact on trust, leading to increased continuance intention. The results contribute to the field of human–computer interaction by investigating the motivations for utilizing generative AI chatbots and advancing our comprehension of AI creepiness, trust, and continuance intention. The practical ramifications of this research can inform the design of user interfaces and the development of features for generative AI chatbots.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48257,"journal":{"name":"Telematics and Informatics","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 102030"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is ChatGPT scary good? How user motivations affect creepiness and trust in generative artificial intelligence\",\"authors\":\"Tae Hyun Baek ,&nbsp;Minseong Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tele.2023.102030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Few studies have examined user motivations to use generative artificial intelligence (AI). This research aims to address this gap by examining how user motivations for ChatGPT usage affect perceived creepiness, trust, and the intention to continue using AI chatbot technology. The findings of an online survey (N = 421) reveal a negative relationship between personalization and creepiness, while task efficiency and social interaction are positively associated with creepiness. Increased levels of creepiness, in turn, result in decreased continuance intention. Furthermore, task efficiency and personalization have a positive impact on trust, leading to increased continuance intention. The results contribute to the field of human–computer interaction by investigating the motivations for utilizing generative AI chatbots and advancing our comprehension of AI creepiness, trust, and continuance intention. The practical ramifications of this research can inform the design of user interfaces and the development of features for generative AI chatbots.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telematics and Informatics\",\"volume\":\"83 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102030\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telematics and Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585323000941\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telematics and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585323000941","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

很少有研究考察用户使用生成人工智能的动机。这项研究旨在通过研究用户使用ChatGPT的动机如何影响感知到的恐怖、信任以及继续使用人工智能聊天机器人技术的意图来解决这一差距。一项在线调查的结果(N=421)显示,个性化与恐怖感之间存在负相关,而任务效率和社交互动与恐怖感呈正相关。恐怖程度的增加反过来又导致持续意愿的降低。此外,任务效率和个性化对信任有积极影响,导致持续意愿增加。研究结果通过调查使用生成型人工智能聊天机器人的动机,并促进我们对人工智能爬行、信任和持续意图的理解,为人机交互领域做出了贡献。这项研究的实际成果可以为生成型人工智能聊天机器人的用户界面设计和功能开发提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is ChatGPT scary good? How user motivations affect creepiness and trust in generative artificial intelligence

Few studies have examined user motivations to use generative artificial intelligence (AI). This research aims to address this gap by examining how user motivations for ChatGPT usage affect perceived creepiness, trust, and the intention to continue using AI chatbot technology. The findings of an online survey (N = 421) reveal a negative relationship between personalization and creepiness, while task efficiency and social interaction are positively associated with creepiness. Increased levels of creepiness, in turn, result in decreased continuance intention. Furthermore, task efficiency and personalization have a positive impact on trust, leading to increased continuance intention. The results contribute to the field of human–computer interaction by investigating the motivations for utilizing generative AI chatbots and advancing our comprehension of AI creepiness, trust, and continuance intention. The practical ramifications of this research can inform the design of user interfaces and the development of features for generative AI chatbots.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Telematics and Informatics
Telematics and Informatics INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Telematics and Informatics is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes cutting-edge theoretical and methodological research exploring the social, economic, geographic, political, and cultural impacts of digital technologies. It covers various application areas, such as smart cities, sensors, information fusion, digital society, IoT, cyber-physical technologies, privacy, knowledge management, distributed work, emergency response, mobile communications, health informatics, social media's psychosocial effects, ICT for sustainable development, blockchain, e-commerce, and e-government.
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the dynamics of binge-scrolling: A comprehensive analysis of short-form video consumption using a Stimulus-Organism-Response model Motivations behind problematic short video use: A three-level meta-analysis Crypto-Cognitive Exploitation: Integrating Cognitive, Social, and Technological perspectives on cryptocurrency fraud Are you what you emoji? How skin tone emojis and profile pictures shape attention and social inference processing Engaging with underserved communities during times of crises: A computational analysis of social media interactions with government information about COVID-19 economic relief programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1