绿色轮廓工具:现状与未来展望

IF 5.2 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Advances in Sample Preparation Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.sampre.2023.100068
Marcello Locatelli , Abuzar Kabir , Miryam Perrucci , Songül Ulusoy , Halil Ibrahim Ulusoy , Imran Ali
{"title":"绿色轮廓工具:现状与未来展望","authors":"Marcello Locatelli ,&nbsp;Abuzar Kabir ,&nbsp;Miryam Perrucci ,&nbsp;Songül Ulusoy ,&nbsp;Halil Ibrahim Ulusoy ,&nbsp;Imran Ali","doi":"10.1016/j.sampre.2023.100068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The idea of Green Chemistry began to take shape in an increasingly important way starting in the 90 s when the impact of chemical products and processes began to be critically evaluated.</p><p>In the analytical chemistry field, green chemistry represents an essential factor to consider whenever a laboratory procedure is planned. Therefore, from the start it is necessary examine not only green chemistry (GC) but also green analytical chemistry (GAC). The impact of the GAC on publications shows how the trend has seen an exponential increase from 1995 to 2018. From here, it is evident how the GAC is increasingly essential in the analytical chemist work who needs uniform, impartial, and standardized tools and elements to evaluate the \"<em>green profile</em>\" of the procedures, also in order to perform a direct comparison between methods and procedures.</p><p>The purpose of this review is to report, compare, and critically evaluate the tools available today, such as Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), National Environmental Methods Index (NEMI), Analytical Eco-Scale, Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI) and ComplexGAPI, RGB (Red Green Blue) and White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) models, hexagon-CALIFICAMET, and finally Analytical GREEnness Metric approach (AGREE) and AGREEprep. This comparison was performed in the text after a short introduction to the concepts and principles related explicitly to GC, GAC, and Green Sample Preparation (GSP).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100052,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Sample Preparation","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100068"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Green profile tools: Current status and future perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Marcello Locatelli ,&nbsp;Abuzar Kabir ,&nbsp;Miryam Perrucci ,&nbsp;Songül Ulusoy ,&nbsp;Halil Ibrahim Ulusoy ,&nbsp;Imran Ali\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sampre.2023.100068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The idea of Green Chemistry began to take shape in an increasingly important way starting in the 90 s when the impact of chemical products and processes began to be critically evaluated.</p><p>In the analytical chemistry field, green chemistry represents an essential factor to consider whenever a laboratory procedure is planned. Therefore, from the start it is necessary examine not only green chemistry (GC) but also green analytical chemistry (GAC). The impact of the GAC on publications shows how the trend has seen an exponential increase from 1995 to 2018. From here, it is evident how the GAC is increasingly essential in the analytical chemist work who needs uniform, impartial, and standardized tools and elements to evaluate the \\\"<em>green profile</em>\\\" of the procedures, also in order to perform a direct comparison between methods and procedures.</p><p>The purpose of this review is to report, compare, and critically evaluate the tools available today, such as Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), National Environmental Methods Index (NEMI), Analytical Eco-Scale, Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI) and ComplexGAPI, RGB (Red Green Blue) and White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) models, hexagon-CALIFICAMET, and finally Analytical GREEnness Metric approach (AGREE) and AGREEprep. This comparison was performed in the text after a short introduction to the concepts and principles related explicitly to GC, GAC, and Green Sample Preparation (GSP).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Sample Preparation\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100068\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Sample Preparation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772582023000189\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Sample Preparation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772582023000189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

从90年代开始,当化学产品和工艺的影响开始被严格评估时,绿色化学的理念开始以一种越来越重要的方式形成。在分析化学领域,无论何时计划实验室程序,绿色化学都是一个需要考虑的重要因素。因此,从一开始就不仅要考察绿色化学,还要考察绿色分析化学。GAC对出版物的影响表明,从1995年到2018年,这一趋势呈指数级增长。从这里可以明显看出,GAC在分析化学家工作中越来越重要,他们需要统一、公正和标准化的工具和元素来评估程序的“绿色概况”,也为了在方法和程序之间进行直接比较。本综述的目的是报告、比较和批判性地评估当今可用的工具,如生命周期评估(LCA)、国家环境方法指数(NEMI)、分析生态量表、绿色分析程序指数(GAPI)和ComplexGAPI、RGB(红-绿-蓝)和白色分析化学(WAC)模型、六边形CALIFICAMET,最后是分析灰色度量方法(AGREE)和AGREEprep。在简要介绍了与GC、GAC和绿色样品制备(GSP)明确相关的概念和原理后,在正文中进行了此比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Green profile tools: Current status and future perspectives

The idea of Green Chemistry began to take shape in an increasingly important way starting in the 90 s when the impact of chemical products and processes began to be critically evaluated.

In the analytical chemistry field, green chemistry represents an essential factor to consider whenever a laboratory procedure is planned. Therefore, from the start it is necessary examine not only green chemistry (GC) but also green analytical chemistry (GAC). The impact of the GAC on publications shows how the trend has seen an exponential increase from 1995 to 2018. From here, it is evident how the GAC is increasingly essential in the analytical chemist work who needs uniform, impartial, and standardized tools and elements to evaluate the "green profile" of the procedures, also in order to perform a direct comparison between methods and procedures.

The purpose of this review is to report, compare, and critically evaluate the tools available today, such as Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), National Environmental Methods Index (NEMI), Analytical Eco-Scale, Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI) and ComplexGAPI, RGB (Red Green Blue) and White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) models, hexagon-CALIFICAMET, and finally Analytical GREEnness Metric approach (AGREE) and AGREEprep. This comparison was performed in the text after a short introduction to the concepts and principles related explicitly to GC, GAC, and Green Sample Preparation (GSP).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Determination of steroid hormones in sea urchins by microwave-assisted extraction and ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry Extraction of synthetic cathinones from biological samples: A systematic review Microextraction by packed sorbent: Introducing a novel hybrid silica-based chitosan-graphene oxide biosorbent for the evaluation of pesticides and antibiotics in food matrices One step derivatization and switchable hydrophilicity solvent-based microextraction for the determination of adamantane analogues in human urine by HPLC-FLD Recent advances in the application of MOFs and COFs composites for sample preparation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1