毒品政策能改变大麻使用的起始选择吗?意大利刑事定罪的启示

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 Medicine Advances in Life Course Research Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.alcr.2023.100566
Elisa Benedetti , Gabriele Lombardi , Sabrina Molinaro
{"title":"毒品政策能改变大麻使用的起始选择吗?意大利刑事定罪的启示","authors":"Elisa Benedetti ,&nbsp;Gabriele Lombardi ,&nbsp;Sabrina Molinaro","doi":"10.1016/j.alcr.2023.100566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A key question in the ongoing drug policy debate is whether legalising cannabis leads to an increase in cannabis use. In Europe although no country has yet moved to legalisation, many have decriminalised personal possession. However, some jurisdictions are still discussing increased sanctions or have further strengthened penalties for the possession of illicit substances in order to deter widespread cannabis use. This is the case in Italy, where a law introduced in 2006 and repealed in 2014 de facto criminalised personal drug possession, and a potential increase in penalties is currently being debated as a policy option. Despite the intense public debate surrounding the legal status of cannabis, limited empirical research has been conducted in Europe to assess the population-level effects of drug policy reforms, mainly due to data availability constraints. In this study, we analyse the effect of criminalisation on the age of onset of cannabis use using an unique dataset that combines seven waves (2001–2017) of the nationally representative Italian Population Survey on Alcohol and other Drugs with relevant socio-economic data. The final dataset comprises 77,650 observations. Leveraging the rare opportunity to examine the effects of a policy that remained in force for a limited period, our empirical investigation employs a Complementary Log-Log model to analyse the starting rate, that is, the transition rate from non-use to use. To do so, we use self-reported data on the age of first cannabis use. Our results suggest that the implementation of stricter punishments has a significant effect in reducing the likelihood of early cannabis use initiation. The observed impact of criminalisation is limited in younger ages and diminished as adulthood approaches. This paper also discusses other considerations related to the social costs of criminalisation, which should also be taken into account in the ongoing policy debate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47126,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Life Course Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040260823000412/pdfft?md5=74a236acb72ce4429a74c31f205eeeac&pid=1-s2.0-S1040260823000412-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can drug policies modify cannabis use starting choice? Insights from criminalisation in Italy\",\"authors\":\"Elisa Benedetti ,&nbsp;Gabriele Lombardi ,&nbsp;Sabrina Molinaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.alcr.2023.100566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A key question in the ongoing drug policy debate is whether legalising cannabis leads to an increase in cannabis use. In Europe although no country has yet moved to legalisation, many have decriminalised personal possession. However, some jurisdictions are still discussing increased sanctions or have further strengthened penalties for the possession of illicit substances in order to deter widespread cannabis use. This is the case in Italy, where a law introduced in 2006 and repealed in 2014 de facto criminalised personal drug possession, and a potential increase in penalties is currently being debated as a policy option. Despite the intense public debate surrounding the legal status of cannabis, limited empirical research has been conducted in Europe to assess the population-level effects of drug policy reforms, mainly due to data availability constraints. In this study, we analyse the effect of criminalisation on the age of onset of cannabis use using an unique dataset that combines seven waves (2001–2017) of the nationally representative Italian Population Survey on Alcohol and other Drugs with relevant socio-economic data. The final dataset comprises 77,650 observations. Leveraging the rare opportunity to examine the effects of a policy that remained in force for a limited period, our empirical investigation employs a Complementary Log-Log model to analyse the starting rate, that is, the transition rate from non-use to use. To do so, we use self-reported data on the age of first cannabis use. Our results suggest that the implementation of stricter punishments has a significant effect in reducing the likelihood of early cannabis use initiation. The observed impact of criminalisation is limited in younger ages and diminished as adulthood approaches. This paper also discusses other considerations related to the social costs of criminalisation, which should also be taken into account in the ongoing policy debate.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Life Course Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040260823000412/pdfft?md5=74a236acb72ce4429a74c31f205eeeac&pid=1-s2.0-S1040260823000412-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Life Course Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040260823000412\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Life Course Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040260823000412","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

正在进行的毒品政策辩论中的一个关键问题是,大麻合法化是否会导致大麻使用的增加。在欧洲,尽管还没有国家走向合法化,但许多国家已经将个人财产合法化。然而,一些司法管辖区仍在讨论加强制裁或进一步加强对持有非法物质的处罚,以阻止大麻的广泛使用。意大利的情况就是这样,2006年出台并于2014年废除的一项法律将个人持有毒品事实上定为犯罪,目前正在讨论是否可能增加处罚作为一种政策选择。尽管围绕大麻的法律地位展开了激烈的公开辩论,但欧洲为评估毒品政策改革对人口层面的影响而进行的实证研究有限,这主要是由于数据可用性的限制。在这项研究中,我们使用一个独特的数据集分析了刑事定罪对大麻使用年龄的影响,该数据集结合了具有全国代表性的意大利酒精和其他毒品人口调查的七波(2001-2007年)和相关的社会经济数据。最终数据集包括77650个观测值。利用这一难得的机会来检验一项在有限时间内仍然有效的政策的影响,我们的实证调查采用了补充对数对数模型来分析启动率,即从不使用到使用的过渡率。为此,我们使用了关于首次使用大麻年龄的自我报告数据。我们的研究结果表明,实施更严格的惩罚在降低早期开始使用大麻的可能性方面具有显著效果。观察到的刑事定罪的影响在年轻人中是有限的,并且随着成年期的临近而减弱。本文还讨论了与刑事定罪的社会成本有关的其他考虑因素,在正在进行的政策辩论中也应考虑这些因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can drug policies modify cannabis use starting choice? Insights from criminalisation in Italy

A key question in the ongoing drug policy debate is whether legalising cannabis leads to an increase in cannabis use. In Europe although no country has yet moved to legalisation, many have decriminalised personal possession. However, some jurisdictions are still discussing increased sanctions or have further strengthened penalties for the possession of illicit substances in order to deter widespread cannabis use. This is the case in Italy, where a law introduced in 2006 and repealed in 2014 de facto criminalised personal drug possession, and a potential increase in penalties is currently being debated as a policy option. Despite the intense public debate surrounding the legal status of cannabis, limited empirical research has been conducted in Europe to assess the population-level effects of drug policy reforms, mainly due to data availability constraints. In this study, we analyse the effect of criminalisation on the age of onset of cannabis use using an unique dataset that combines seven waves (2001–2017) of the nationally representative Italian Population Survey on Alcohol and other Drugs with relevant socio-economic data. The final dataset comprises 77,650 observations. Leveraging the rare opportunity to examine the effects of a policy that remained in force for a limited period, our empirical investigation employs a Complementary Log-Log model to analyse the starting rate, that is, the transition rate from non-use to use. To do so, we use self-reported data on the age of first cannabis use. Our results suggest that the implementation of stricter punishments has a significant effect in reducing the likelihood of early cannabis use initiation. The observed impact of criminalisation is limited in younger ages and diminished as adulthood approaches. This paper also discusses other considerations related to the social costs of criminalisation, which should also be taken into account in the ongoing policy debate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Life Course Research
Advances in Life Course Research SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Advances in Life Course Research publishes articles dealing with various aspects of the human life course. Seeing life course research as an essentially interdisciplinary field of study, it invites and welcomes contributions from anthropology, biosocial science, demography, epidemiology and statistics, gerontology, economics, management and organisation science, policy studies, psychology, research methodology and sociology. Original empirical analyses, theoretical contributions, methodological studies and reviews accessible to a broad set of readers are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Childhood poverty trajectories and trajectories of healthcare contacts in adolescence and young adulthood Complex nexus: Economic development, rural-to-urban migration, and transition to adulthood in China Editorial Board How the size and structure of egocentric networks change during a life transition The long-term consequences of school suspension and expulsion on depressive symptoms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1