利用企业家的gmail数据探索客观与主观的社会关系

Q1 Business, Management and Accounting Journal of Business Venturing Insights Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jbvi.2023.e00421
Joseph Billingsley , Jeffrey M. Pollack , Timothy L. Michaelis , Elizabeth M. Tracy , Dennis Barber III , Ace Beorchia , Jon C. Carr , Gabe Gonzalez , Michael L. Harris , Grayson Morrow , Duygu Phillips , Matthew W. Rutherford , Lewis Sheats
{"title":"利用企业家的gmail数据探索客观与主观的社会关系","authors":"Joseph Billingsley ,&nbsp;Jeffrey M. Pollack ,&nbsp;Timothy L. Michaelis ,&nbsp;Elizabeth M. Tracy ,&nbsp;Dennis Barber III ,&nbsp;Ace Beorchia ,&nbsp;Jon C. Carr ,&nbsp;Gabe Gonzalez ,&nbsp;Michael L. Harris ,&nbsp;Grayson Morrow ,&nbsp;Duygu Phillips ,&nbsp;Matthew W. Rutherford ,&nbsp;Lewis Sheats","doi":"10.1016/j.jbvi.2023.e00421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It is intuitively appealing and common in the literature to describe social ties as one large category that represents multiple constructs which have similar relations across operationalizations. However, that approach does not capture the nuance in the literature and might obscure notable differences between subjective and objective network tie measures, and how those differences extend to relations with venture-level outcomes. Drawing upon novel objective measures of network ties derived from analyses of entrepreneurs’ Gmail data, we offer an empirical assessment of subjective social ties relative to objective social ties. In examining how those assessments relate to multiple metrics of venture performance, we look at both subjective and objective measures. We find that objective network measures predict overall subjective (but not objective) venture performance at an average of <em>r</em> = .31 (for network size) and <em>r</em> = .29 (for network engagement). We delve into the implications of our work, and discuss how future research can progress more effectively and efficiently with an eye towards the practical usefulness of our findings for entrepreneurs and entrepreneurship service organizations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38078,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing Insights","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article e00421"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring objective versus subjective social ties using entrepreneurs’ gmail data\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Billingsley ,&nbsp;Jeffrey M. Pollack ,&nbsp;Timothy L. Michaelis ,&nbsp;Elizabeth M. Tracy ,&nbsp;Dennis Barber III ,&nbsp;Ace Beorchia ,&nbsp;Jon C. Carr ,&nbsp;Gabe Gonzalez ,&nbsp;Michael L. Harris ,&nbsp;Grayson Morrow ,&nbsp;Duygu Phillips ,&nbsp;Matthew W. Rutherford ,&nbsp;Lewis Sheats\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbvi.2023.e00421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>It is intuitively appealing and common in the literature to describe social ties as one large category that represents multiple constructs which have similar relations across operationalizations. However, that approach does not capture the nuance in the literature and might obscure notable differences between subjective and objective network tie measures, and how those differences extend to relations with venture-level outcomes. Drawing upon novel objective measures of network ties derived from analyses of entrepreneurs’ Gmail data, we offer an empirical assessment of subjective social ties relative to objective social ties. In examining how those assessments relate to multiple metrics of venture performance, we look at both subjective and objective measures. We find that objective network measures predict overall subjective (but not objective) venture performance at an average of <em>r</em> = .31 (for network size) and <em>r</em> = .29 (for network engagement). We delve into the implications of our work, and discuss how future research can progress more effectively and efficiently with an eye towards the practical usefulness of our findings for entrepreneurs and entrepreneurship service organizations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Venturing Insights\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"Article e00421\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Venturing Insights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352673423000501\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Venturing Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352673423000501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将社会关系描述为一个大类别,代表在操作中具有相似关系的多个结构,这在文献中很有吸引力,也很常见。然而,这种方法并没有捕捉到文献中的细微差别,可能会掩盖主观和客观网络联系测量之间的显著差异,以及这些差异如何扩展到与风险水平结果的关系。基于对企业家Gmail数据的分析,我们对主观社会关系与客观社会关系进行了实证评估。在研究这些评估与风险绩效的多个指标之间的关系时,我们同时考察了主观和客观指标。我们发现,客观的网络测量预测总体主观(但非客观)风险绩效,平均r=.31(网络规模)和r=.29(网络参与)。我们深入研究了我们工作的影响,并讨论了未来的研究如何更有效地进行,着眼于我们的研究结果对企业家和创业服务组织的实际有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring objective versus subjective social ties using entrepreneurs’ gmail data

It is intuitively appealing and common in the literature to describe social ties as one large category that represents multiple constructs which have similar relations across operationalizations. However, that approach does not capture the nuance in the literature and might obscure notable differences between subjective and objective network tie measures, and how those differences extend to relations with venture-level outcomes. Drawing upon novel objective measures of network ties derived from analyses of entrepreneurs’ Gmail data, we offer an empirical assessment of subjective social ties relative to objective social ties. In examining how those assessments relate to multiple metrics of venture performance, we look at both subjective and objective measures. We find that objective network measures predict overall subjective (but not objective) venture performance at an average of r = .31 (for network size) and r = .29 (for network engagement). We delve into the implications of our work, and discuss how future research can progress more effectively and efficiently with an eye towards the practical usefulness of our findings for entrepreneurs and entrepreneurship service organizations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Business Venturing Insights
Journal of Business Venturing Insights Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
28 days
期刊最新文献
Empirical entrepreneurial ecosystem research: A guide to creating multilevel datasets The myth of entrepreneurship as a tool: Reorienting business venturing as a goal in itself in a post-growth society Self-employment and inflammation in older adults: Examining biomarkers in the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe Not all leavers are equal: How rank and destination influence enforcement of restrictive covenants How sector fluidity (knowledge-intensiveness and innovation) shapes startups’ resilience during crises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1