从乌龟到英亩:道路治理过程中财产和非人类物种的关系和运动

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Geoforum Pub Date : 2023-10-20 DOI:10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103882
Caitlin Jones
{"title":"从乌龟到英亩:道路治理过程中财产和非人类物种的关系和运动","authors":"Caitlin Jones","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A web of species interdependencies, movements, and relationships exist within areas targeted for development. However, these areas hosting a multitude of more-than-human beings’ liveliness that are often only viewed by decision-makers in terms of the property regimes that encompass them. This paper examines this phenomenon in a case study of the conflict between gopher tortoise (<em>Gopherus polyphemus</em>) conservation and the proposed Osceola Parkway Extension in Central Florida. Gopher tortoise conservation in Florida offers a window into how conservation, mitigation strategies like offsetting, the exchangeability of property interact. The paper highlights what happens when decision-makers assume a property lens to understand and mitigate for conflicts between development and more-than-human relations to the environment. Understanding the two distinct, out of sync movements – that of gopher tortoises and that of conservation properties in offsetting – demonstrates the ways a multitude of more-than-human relationships are obscured and abstracted into transactional pieces through a property lens that moves through a logic of exchangeability. This suggests more-than-human lives, mobilities, and relationships need to become more fully part of the discussions and decision-making processes surrounding development-environmental conflicts. Only then can we begin to work towards more just multispecies decisions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 103882"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tortoises to acres: The relationships and movements of property and more-than-human species in road governance processes\",\"authors\":\"Caitlin Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103882\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A web of species interdependencies, movements, and relationships exist within areas targeted for development. However, these areas hosting a multitude of more-than-human beings’ liveliness that are often only viewed by decision-makers in terms of the property regimes that encompass them. This paper examines this phenomenon in a case study of the conflict between gopher tortoise (<em>Gopherus polyphemus</em>) conservation and the proposed Osceola Parkway Extension in Central Florida. Gopher tortoise conservation in Florida offers a window into how conservation, mitigation strategies like offsetting, the exchangeability of property interact. The paper highlights what happens when decision-makers assume a property lens to understand and mitigate for conflicts between development and more-than-human relations to the environment. Understanding the two distinct, out of sync movements – that of gopher tortoises and that of conservation properties in offsetting – demonstrates the ways a multitude of more-than-human relationships are obscured and abstracted into transactional pieces through a property lens that moves through a logic of exchangeability. This suggests more-than-human lives, mobilities, and relationships need to become more fully part of the discussions and decision-making processes surrounding development-environmental conflicts. Only then can we begin to work towards more just multispecies decisions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoforum\",\"volume\":\"147 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103882\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoforum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718523002087\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718523002087","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在发展目标区域内存在着物种相互依赖、运动和关系的网络。然而,这些地区拥有大量超乎人类的活力,而决策者往往只从涵盖这些地区的财产制度的角度来看待这些活力。本文以地鼠龟(Gopherus polyphemus)保护与佛罗里达州中部拟议的奥西奥拉公园大道扩建之间的冲突为例,探讨了这一现象。佛罗里达州的地鼠龟保护提供了一个窗口,让我们了解保护、缓解策略(如抵消)、财产的可交换性是如何相互作用的。这篇论文强调了当决策者采用财产视角来理解和缓解发展与超越人类与环境的关系之间的冲突时会发生什么。理解这两种截然不同的、不同步的运动——地鼠龟的运动和抵消中的保护属性运动——展示了许多超越人类的关系是如何被模糊的,并通过通过可交换性逻辑移动的属性镜头抽象为交易碎片的。这表明,在围绕发展与环境冲突的讨论和决策过程中,需要更充分地考虑超越人类的生命、流动性和关系。只有这样,我们才能开始朝着更公正的多物种决策方向努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tortoises to acres: The relationships and movements of property and more-than-human species in road governance processes

A web of species interdependencies, movements, and relationships exist within areas targeted for development. However, these areas hosting a multitude of more-than-human beings’ liveliness that are often only viewed by decision-makers in terms of the property regimes that encompass them. This paper examines this phenomenon in a case study of the conflict between gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) conservation and the proposed Osceola Parkway Extension in Central Florida. Gopher tortoise conservation in Florida offers a window into how conservation, mitigation strategies like offsetting, the exchangeability of property interact. The paper highlights what happens when decision-makers assume a property lens to understand and mitigate for conflicts between development and more-than-human relations to the environment. Understanding the two distinct, out of sync movements – that of gopher tortoises and that of conservation properties in offsetting – demonstrates the ways a multitude of more-than-human relationships are obscured and abstracted into transactional pieces through a property lens that moves through a logic of exchangeability. This suggests more-than-human lives, mobilities, and relationships need to become more fully part of the discussions and decision-making processes surrounding development-environmental conflicts. Only then can we begin to work towards more just multispecies decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
期刊最新文献
Mapping the spatial and temporal patterns of housing instability in Malmö Of ships and soundboxes: Contrapuntal explorations of hydrocoloniality and the materiality of music Creative production in the digital age: A network analysis of the digital game industry in China New directions for resilience research: The significance of volume and verticality “Renovate to rent” as a spatio-temporal fix under state entrepreneurialism: Urban renewal through long-term rental apartment development in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1