识别有能力的问题提出者并探索他们的特点

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Mathematical Behavior Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101086
Ling Zhang , Andreas J. Stylianides , Gabriel J. Stylianides
{"title":"识别有能力的问题提出者并探索他们的特点","authors":"Ling Zhang ,&nbsp;Andreas J. Stylianides ,&nbsp;Gabriel J. Stylianides","doi":"10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In a study involving 66 masters and 60 sixth-grade students, we conducted Principal Component Analysis to identify more-and-less competent problem posers based on performance criteria rather than, as in prior research, relying on participants’ mathematical experience or background. Also, to cast light on characteristics of competent posers, we explored possible patterns in the problem-posing process based on the two identified groups’ self-reports and eye-movements. The results showed that: masters students had a significantly lower proportion of the more-competent group and a higher proportion of the less-competent group than sixth graders; more-competent posers perceived a better understanding of the problem-posing tasks than less-competent posers; more-competent posers exhibited significantly more fixation time on completing the entire problem-posing activities than less-competent posers, though this pattern disappeared across particular stages of the problem-posing process; and more-competent posers appeared to engage in a more purposeful search and processing to construct their problems than less-competent posers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematical Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying competent problem posers and exploring their characteristics\",\"authors\":\"Ling Zhang ,&nbsp;Andreas J. Stylianides ,&nbsp;Gabriel J. Stylianides\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In a study involving 66 masters and 60 sixth-grade students, we conducted Principal Component Analysis to identify more-and-less competent problem posers based on performance criteria rather than, as in prior research, relying on participants’ mathematical experience or background. Also, to cast light on characteristics of competent posers, we explored possible patterns in the problem-posing process based on the two identified groups’ self-reports and eye-movements. The results showed that: masters students had a significantly lower proportion of the more-competent group and a higher proportion of the less-competent group than sixth graders; more-competent posers perceived a better understanding of the problem-posing tasks than less-competent posers; more-competent posers exhibited significantly more fixation time on completing the entire problem-posing activities than less-competent posers, though this pattern disappeared across particular stages of the problem-posing process; and more-competent posers appeared to engage in a more purposeful search and processing to construct their problems than less-competent posers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mathematical Behavior\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mathematical Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732312323000561\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematical Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732312323000561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在一项涉及66名硕士和60名六年级学生的研究中,我们进行了主成分分析,以根据表现标准识别能力强弱的问题,而不是像之前的研究那样,依赖于参与者的数学经验或背景。此外,为了揭示有能力的摆姿势者的特征,我们基于两组被试的自我报告和眼球运动,探索了摆姿势过程中的可能模式。结果表明:硕士生较强能力组所占比例显著低于六年级学生,较弱能力组所占比例显著高于六年级学生;能力较强的人比能力较弱的人更能理解提出问题的任务;能力较强的人在完成整个问题提问活动时所花的固定时间明显多于能力较弱的人,尽管这种模式在问题提问过程的特定阶段消失了;与能力较差的装腔作势者相比,能力较强的装腔作势者似乎更有目的地搜索和处理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identifying competent problem posers and exploring their characteristics

In a study involving 66 masters and 60 sixth-grade students, we conducted Principal Component Analysis to identify more-and-less competent problem posers based on performance criteria rather than, as in prior research, relying on participants’ mathematical experience or background. Also, to cast light on characteristics of competent posers, we explored possible patterns in the problem-posing process based on the two identified groups’ self-reports and eye-movements. The results showed that: masters students had a significantly lower proportion of the more-competent group and a higher proportion of the less-competent group than sixth graders; more-competent posers perceived a better understanding of the problem-posing tasks than less-competent posers; more-competent posers exhibited significantly more fixation time on completing the entire problem-posing activities than less-competent posers, though this pattern disappeared across particular stages of the problem-posing process; and more-competent posers appeared to engage in a more purposeful search and processing to construct their problems than less-competent posers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mathematical Behavior
Journal of Mathematical Behavior EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
17.60%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mathematical Behavior solicits original research on the learning and teaching of mathematics. We are interested especially in basic research, research that aims to clarify, in detail and depth, how mathematical ideas develop in learners. Over three decades, our experience confirms a founding premise of this journal: that mathematical thinking, hence mathematics learning as a social enterprise, is special. It is special because mathematics is special, both logically and psychologically. Logically, through the way that mathematical ideas and methods have been built, refined and organized for centuries across a range of cultures; and psychologically, through the variety of ways people today, in many walks of life, make sense of mathematics, develop it, make it their own.
期刊最新文献
Encouraging students to explain their ideas when learning mathematics: A psychological perspective Lecturers' use of questions in undergraduate mathematics lectures Secondary teachers’ guided reinvention of the definitions of reducible and irreducible elements Creating and sharing linear algebra metaphors as an assessment for engaging students beyond the cognitive domain Engagement with student written work as an instantiation of and proxy for how college calculus instructors engage with student thinking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1