会阴切开术女性与二级会阴撕裂女性的盆腔疼痛

IF 0.1 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Clinica e Investigacion en Ginecologia y Obstetricia Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.gine.2023.100848
I. Asorey Veiga , I. Aparicio Rodríguez , M. Macía Cortiñas
{"title":"会阴切开术女性与二级会阴撕裂女性的盆腔疼痛","authors":"I. Asorey Veiga ,&nbsp;I. Aparicio Rodríguez ,&nbsp;M. Macía Cortiñas","doi":"10.1016/j.gine.2023.100848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Pelvic pain is one of the most common pelvic floor dysfunctions in the postpartum period, depending on the degree of injury and the time at which it is assessed. The degree of involvement of a mediolateral episiotomy is similar to that of a second degree perineal tear, therefore it was decided to conduct a study to collect the degree of pain reported using the McGill Pain Questionnaire.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>An observational, prospective longitudinal epidemiological study of dynamic cohorts was conducted among 384 women, of whom 255 had a second-degree tear and 129 had undergone an episiotomy. An assessment of the pelvic floor was carried out, together with data collection (performance or not of perineal massage, pelvic floor muscle exercises, presence of Kristeller, type of suture) as well as the degree and type of pain using the McGill Questionnaire, in the immediate puerperium, at six weeks, and six months of postpartum.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the immediate puerperium more than 50% of women reported some type of painful sensation, without finding significant differences between both cohorts. However, as the study evolved, there was a progressive decrease in pain in both cohorts. By six weeks postpartum, less than 33% of women reported a painful sensation, considered as absence of pain according to the criteria of the McGill questionnaire.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The presence of episiotomy or second degree perineal tear was not related to perineal pain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":41294,"journal":{"name":"Clinica e Investigacion en Ginecologia y Obstetricia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dolor pélvico en mujeres con episiotomía versus mujeres con desgarro perineal de segundo grado\",\"authors\":\"I. Asorey Veiga ,&nbsp;I. Aparicio Rodríguez ,&nbsp;M. Macía Cortiñas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gine.2023.100848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Pelvic pain is one of the most common pelvic floor dysfunctions in the postpartum period, depending on the degree of injury and the time at which it is assessed. The degree of involvement of a mediolateral episiotomy is similar to that of a second degree perineal tear, therefore it was decided to conduct a study to collect the degree of pain reported using the McGill Pain Questionnaire.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>An observational, prospective longitudinal epidemiological study of dynamic cohorts was conducted among 384 women, of whom 255 had a second-degree tear and 129 had undergone an episiotomy. An assessment of the pelvic floor was carried out, together with data collection (performance or not of perineal massage, pelvic floor muscle exercises, presence of Kristeller, type of suture) as well as the degree and type of pain using the McGill Questionnaire, in the immediate puerperium, at six weeks, and six months of postpartum.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the immediate puerperium more than 50% of women reported some type of painful sensation, without finding significant differences between both cohorts. However, as the study evolved, there was a progressive decrease in pain in both cohorts. By six weeks postpartum, less than 33% of women reported a painful sensation, considered as absence of pain according to the criteria of the McGill questionnaire.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The presence of episiotomy or second degree perineal tear was not related to perineal pain.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinica e Investigacion en Ginecologia y Obstetricia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinica e Investigacion en Ginecologia y Obstetricia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210573X23000187\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica e Investigacion en Ginecologia y Obstetricia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210573X23000187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

盆腔疼痛是产后最常见的盆底功能障碍之一,取决于损伤程度和评估时间。会阴中外侧切开术的受累程度与会阴二度撕裂相似,因此决定进行一项研究,收集使用McGill疼痛问卷报告的疼痛程度。材料和方法对384名女性进行了一项观察性、前瞻性纵向流行病学动态队列研究,其中255名女性患有二度撕裂,129名女性接受了外阴切开术。在产褥期、产后6周和产后6个月,对骨盆底进行评估,收集数据(是否进行会阴按摩、骨盆底肌肉锻炼、有无Kristeller、缝线类型)以及使用McGill问卷调查疼痛的程度和类型。结果在产褥期,超过50%的妇女报告了某种类型的痛觉,两组之间没有发现显著差异。然而,随着研究的深入,两组患者的疼痛都在逐渐减轻。到产后六周,不到33%的妇女报告有疼痛感,根据麦吉尔问卷的标准,被认为没有疼痛。结论会阴切开或会阴二度撕裂与会阴疼痛无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dolor pélvico en mujeres con episiotomía versus mujeres con desgarro perineal de segundo grado

Introduction

Pelvic pain is one of the most common pelvic floor dysfunctions in the postpartum period, depending on the degree of injury and the time at which it is assessed. The degree of involvement of a mediolateral episiotomy is similar to that of a second degree perineal tear, therefore it was decided to conduct a study to collect the degree of pain reported using the McGill Pain Questionnaire.

Material and methods

An observational, prospective longitudinal epidemiological study of dynamic cohorts was conducted among 384 women, of whom 255 had a second-degree tear and 129 had undergone an episiotomy. An assessment of the pelvic floor was carried out, together with data collection (performance or not of perineal massage, pelvic floor muscle exercises, presence of Kristeller, type of suture) as well as the degree and type of pain using the McGill Questionnaire, in the immediate puerperium, at six weeks, and six months of postpartum.

Results

In the immediate puerperium more than 50% of women reported some type of painful sensation, without finding significant differences between both cohorts. However, as the study evolved, there was a progressive decrease in pain in both cohorts. By six weeks postpartum, less than 33% of women reported a painful sensation, considered as absence of pain according to the criteria of the McGill questionnaire.

Conclusion

The presence of episiotomy or second degree perineal tear was not related to perineal pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: Una excelente publicación para mantenerse al día en los temas de máximo interés de la ginecología de vanguardia. Resulta idónea tanto para el especialista en ginecología, como en obstetricia o en pediatría, y está presente en los más prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
期刊最新文献
Descripción de un caso: liposarcoma de mama radioinducido Update on second trimester ultrasound scanning in pregnancy Perinatal outcomes in pregnant women over 45 years old: Singleton or multiple pregnancy? Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) incidence. Twenty-five years’ evolution Preconceptional micronutrient supplementation and spontaneous pregnancy rates in women of higher reproductive age and unexplained infertility: A comparative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1