高山滑雪两种转弯转换技术的EMG、NIRS和RPE反应

John G. Seifert , Ronald W. Kipp , Shannon Griffin , David Graham
{"title":"高山滑雪两种转弯转换技术的EMG、NIRS和RPE反应","authors":"John G. Seifert ,&nbsp;Ronald W. Kipp ,&nbsp;Shannon Griffin ,&nbsp;David Graham","doi":"10.1016/j.jsampl.2023.100037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Two techniques facilitate the transition in an alpine ski turn, extension (EXT) and flexion (FLEX). The purpose of this study is to compare NIRS, EMG, and RPE responses between EXT and FLEX in expert level skiers.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>24 Professional Ski Instructors of America Level III alpine ski instructors, examiners, and National Demonstration Team members completed one standardized run each of EXT and FLEX. A turn cycle, made of a right and left turn, was divided into four Phases.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>NIRS assessed HbO2 desaturation in the rectus femoris (RF) and vastus lateralis (VL). EMG was collected from the RF, VL, and gluteus medius (GM). Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE, 0–10) assessed subjective exertion.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>FLEX resulted in greater HbO2 desaturation in RF (−77.9 ​± ​21% vs. −67.5 ​± ​23%, p ​&lt; ​0.001), VL (−69.8 ​± ​23.1% vs. −61.1 ​± ​24.6%, p ​&lt; ​0.001) and RPE (6.0 ​± ​2.3 vs. 5.2 ​± ​2.0, p ​&lt; ​0.001) compared to EXT. FLEX generally resulted in greater EMG activity in the steering and transition phases for RF and VL (p ​&lt; ​0.001) while EXT resulted in greater activity GM on the inside leg.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Caution should be exercised with recreational skiers as the FLEX transition resulted in significantly greater physiological stress compared to EXT. Localized hypoxia appears to be the focal point of this stress as HbO<sub>2</sub> desaturation was ∼15% greater along with 15% greater RPE during FLEX. FLEX also produced greater EMG activity than EXT in the majority of the turn phases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74029,"journal":{"name":"JSAMS plus","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100037"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The EMG, NIRS, and RPE responses to two turn transition techniques in alpine skiing\",\"authors\":\"John G. Seifert ,&nbsp;Ronald W. Kipp ,&nbsp;Shannon Griffin ,&nbsp;David Graham\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsampl.2023.100037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Two techniques facilitate the transition in an alpine ski turn, extension (EXT) and flexion (FLEX). The purpose of this study is to compare NIRS, EMG, and RPE responses between EXT and FLEX in expert level skiers.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>24 Professional Ski Instructors of America Level III alpine ski instructors, examiners, and National Demonstration Team members completed one standardized run each of EXT and FLEX. A turn cycle, made of a right and left turn, was divided into four Phases.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>NIRS assessed HbO2 desaturation in the rectus femoris (RF) and vastus lateralis (VL). EMG was collected from the RF, VL, and gluteus medius (GM). Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE, 0–10) assessed subjective exertion.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>FLEX resulted in greater HbO2 desaturation in RF (−77.9 ​± ​21% vs. −67.5 ​± ​23%, p ​&lt; ​0.001), VL (−69.8 ​± ​23.1% vs. −61.1 ​± ​24.6%, p ​&lt; ​0.001) and RPE (6.0 ​± ​2.3 vs. 5.2 ​± ​2.0, p ​&lt; ​0.001) compared to EXT. FLEX generally resulted in greater EMG activity in the steering and transition phases for RF and VL (p ​&lt; ​0.001) while EXT resulted in greater activity GM on the inside leg.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Caution should be exercised with recreational skiers as the FLEX transition resulted in significantly greater physiological stress compared to EXT. Localized hypoxia appears to be the focal point of this stress as HbO<sub>2</sub> desaturation was ∼15% greater along with 15% greater RPE during FLEX. FLEX also produced greater EMG activity than EXT in the majority of the turn phases.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JSAMS plus\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100037\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JSAMS plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772696723000182\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSAMS plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772696723000182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的两种技术有助于高山滑雪转弯的过渡,伸展(EXT)和屈曲(FLEX)。本研究的目的是比较专家级滑雪者EXT和FLEX的NIRS、EMG和RPE反应。Design24名美国专业滑雪教练三级高山滑雪教练、考官和国家示范队成员分别完成了EXT和FLEX的一次标准化跑步。由右转和左转组成的转弯循环分为四个阶段。方法NIRS检测股直肌(RF)和股外侧肌(VL)的HbO2饱和度。从RF、VL和臀中肌(GM)采集EMG。感知用力评分(RPE,0-10)评估主观用力。结果FLEX可使RF中的HbO2去饱和度增加(−77.9​±​21%对-67.5​±​23%,p​<;​0.001),VL(−69.8​±​23.1%对-61.1​±​24.6%,p​<;​0.001)和RPE(6.0​±​2.3与5.2​±​2.0,p​<;​0.001)。FLEX通常在RF和VL的转向和过渡阶段导致更大的EMG活动(p​<;​0.001),而EXT在内侧腿上产生更大的活性GM。结论娱乐性滑雪者应谨慎,因为与EXT相比,FLEX过渡会导致明显更大的生理压力。局部缺氧似乎是这种压力的焦点,因为在FLEX过程中,HbO2去饱和度增加了~15%,RPE增加了15%。在大多数转弯阶段,FLEX也比EXT产生更大的EMG活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The EMG, NIRS, and RPE responses to two turn transition techniques in alpine skiing

Objective

Two techniques facilitate the transition in an alpine ski turn, extension (EXT) and flexion (FLEX). The purpose of this study is to compare NIRS, EMG, and RPE responses between EXT and FLEX in expert level skiers.

Design

24 Professional Ski Instructors of America Level III alpine ski instructors, examiners, and National Demonstration Team members completed one standardized run each of EXT and FLEX. A turn cycle, made of a right and left turn, was divided into four Phases.

Methods

NIRS assessed HbO2 desaturation in the rectus femoris (RF) and vastus lateralis (VL). EMG was collected from the RF, VL, and gluteus medius (GM). Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE, 0–10) assessed subjective exertion.

Results

FLEX resulted in greater HbO2 desaturation in RF (−77.9 ​± ​21% vs. −67.5 ​± ​23%, p ​< ​0.001), VL (−69.8 ​± ​23.1% vs. −61.1 ​± ​24.6%, p ​< ​0.001) and RPE (6.0 ​± ​2.3 vs. 5.2 ​± ​2.0, p ​< ​0.001) compared to EXT. FLEX generally resulted in greater EMG activity in the steering and transition phases for RF and VL (p ​< ​0.001) while EXT resulted in greater activity GM on the inside leg.

Conclusions

Caution should be exercised with recreational skiers as the FLEX transition resulted in significantly greater physiological stress compared to EXT. Localized hypoxia appears to be the focal point of this stress as HbO2 desaturation was ∼15% greater along with 15% greater RPE during FLEX. FLEX also produced greater EMG activity than EXT in the majority of the turn phases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Highlighting head injury research & special issue on exercise oncology The expanding role of exercise oncology in cancer care: An editorial highlighting emerging research Addressing rising knee injury and surgery rates with real-word data; the need for a clinical knee injury registry Effect of supervised exercise training on objectively measured physical activity in patients during anthracycline therapy Ballet after breast cancer: A qualitative evaluation of a novel 16-week ballet intervention for women after breast cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1