澳大利亚昆士兰州弗林德斯集团的社区生物考古项目

IF 0.3 4区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Archaeologies-Journal of the World Archaeological Congress Pub Date : 2020-11-17 DOI:10.1007/s11759-020-09411-w
Shaun Adams, Mark Collard, Doug Williams, Clarence Flinders, Sally Wasef, Michael C. Westaway
{"title":"澳大利亚昆士兰州弗林德斯集团的社区生物考古项目","authors":"Shaun Adams,&nbsp;Mark Collard,&nbsp;Doug Williams,&nbsp;Clarence Flinders,&nbsp;Sally Wasef,&nbsp;Michael C. Westaway","doi":"10.1007/s11759-020-09411-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Bioarchaeological research in Australia has lagged behind that in other regions due to understandable concerns arising from the disregard of Indigenous Australians rights over their ancestors’ remains. To improve this situation, bioarchaeologists working in Australia need to employ more community-oriented approaches to research. This paper reports a project in which we employed such an approach. The project focused on burials in the Flinders Group, Queensland. Traditional Owners played a key role in the excavations and helped devise analyses that would deliver both scientific contributions and socially relevant outcomes. The fieldwork and laboratory analyses yielded a number of interesting results. Most significantly, they revealed that the pattern of mortuary practices recorded by ethnographers in the region in the early 20th century—complex burial of powerful people and simple interment of less important individuals—has a time depth of several hundred years or more. More generally, the project shows that there can be fruitful collaboration between archaeologists and Indigenous communities in relation to the excavation and scientific analysis of Aboriginal ancestral remains.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44740,"journal":{"name":"Archaeologies-Journal of the World Archaeological Congress","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11759-020-09411-w","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Community Bioarchaeology Project in the Flinders Group, Queensland, Australia\",\"authors\":\"Shaun Adams,&nbsp;Mark Collard,&nbsp;Doug Williams,&nbsp;Clarence Flinders,&nbsp;Sally Wasef,&nbsp;Michael C. Westaway\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11759-020-09411-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Bioarchaeological research in Australia has lagged behind that in other regions due to understandable concerns arising from the disregard of Indigenous Australians rights over their ancestors’ remains. To improve this situation, bioarchaeologists working in Australia need to employ more community-oriented approaches to research. This paper reports a project in which we employed such an approach. The project focused on burials in the Flinders Group, Queensland. Traditional Owners played a key role in the excavations and helped devise analyses that would deliver both scientific contributions and socially relevant outcomes. The fieldwork and laboratory analyses yielded a number of interesting results. Most significantly, they revealed that the pattern of mortuary practices recorded by ethnographers in the region in the early 20th century—complex burial of powerful people and simple interment of less important individuals—has a time depth of several hundred years or more. More generally, the project shows that there can be fruitful collaboration between archaeologists and Indigenous communities in relation to the excavation and scientific analysis of Aboriginal ancestral remains.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archaeologies-Journal of the World Archaeological Congress\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11759-020-09411-w\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archaeologies-Journal of the World Archaeological Congress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11759-020-09411-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeologies-Journal of the World Archaeological Congress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11759-020-09411-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

澳大利亚的生物考古研究落后于其他地区,这是可以理解的,因为澳大利亚土著人无视其祖先遗骸的权利。为了改善这种情况,在澳大利亚工作的生物考古学家需要采用更多面向社区的研究方法。本文报道了一个我们采用这种方法的项目。该项目的重点是昆士兰弗林德斯集团的葬礼。传统所有者在发掘中发挥了关键作用,并帮助设计了既能提供科学贡献又能产生社会相关结果的分析。实地调查和实验室分析得出了许多有趣的结果。最重要的是,他们揭示了20世纪初该地区民族志学家记录的太平间做法模式——权贵的复杂埋葬和不太重要的个人的简单埋葬——具有数百年或更长的时间深度。更广泛地说,该项目表明,考古学家和土著社区在挖掘和科学分析土著祖先遗骸方面可以进行富有成效的合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Community Bioarchaeology Project in the Flinders Group, Queensland, Australia

Bioarchaeological research in Australia has lagged behind that in other regions due to understandable concerns arising from the disregard of Indigenous Australians rights over their ancestors’ remains. To improve this situation, bioarchaeologists working in Australia need to employ more community-oriented approaches to research. This paper reports a project in which we employed such an approach. The project focused on burials in the Flinders Group, Queensland. Traditional Owners played a key role in the excavations and helped devise analyses that would deliver both scientific contributions and socially relevant outcomes. The fieldwork and laboratory analyses yielded a number of interesting results. Most significantly, they revealed that the pattern of mortuary practices recorded by ethnographers in the region in the early 20th century—complex burial of powerful people and simple interment of less important individuals—has a time depth of several hundred years or more. More generally, the project shows that there can be fruitful collaboration between archaeologists and Indigenous communities in relation to the excavation and scientific analysis of Aboriginal ancestral remains.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Archaeologies: Journal of the World Archaeological Congress offers a venue for debates and topical issues, through peer-reviewed articles, reports and reviews. It emphasizes contributions that seek to recenter (or decenter) archaeology, and that challenge local and global power geometries. Areas of interest include ethics and archaeology; public archaeology; legacies of colonialism and nationalism within the discipline; the interplay of local and global archaeological traditions; theory and archaeology; the discipline’s involvement in projects of memory, identity, and restitution; and rights and ethics relating to cultural property, issues of acquisition, custodianship, conservation, and display. Recognizing the importance of non-Western epistemologies and intellectual traditions, the journal publishes some material in nonstandard format, including dialogues; annotated photographic essays; transcripts of public events; and statements from elders, custodians, descent groups and individuals.
期刊最新文献
Darwin, Here We Come! Looking Forward to WAC-10 Hidden Histories of Captive and Enslaved Maya Women in the Indigenous Americas Mobilizing Workforce for Building Megaliths in Northeast India: Ethnoarchaeological Insights from Willong Khullen Village in Manipur Correction: Ancestral Stones and Stone Stories: Reimagining Human Relationships with Stone from the Paleolithic to the Present Reviving the Urban Heritage of the Algerian Sahara: Restoration and Sustainability of Earthen Architecture in Ksar Khanguet Sidi Nadji as a Case Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1