管理科学中的心理距离:表现水平理论的贡献和局限性

Mohamed Didi Alaoui
{"title":"管理科学中的心理距离:表现水平理论的贡献和局限性","authors":"Mohamed Didi Alaoui","doi":"10.1002/cjas.1707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article explains how construal level theory (CLT) expand knowledge of management sciences related to the effect of psychological distance on the organization's stakeholders. This work also highlights different limits of this framework and sets out a research agenda to overcome them. The main limits concern 1) a lack of precision regarding the modification of construal level as a function of psychological distance; 2) a prevalence of research on temporal and social distance to retranscribe the effects of a psychological distance theorized as a global concept; 3) numerous inconsistencies regarding multiple distances. Managerial implications are also suggested to handle the psychological distance of the stakeholders.</p>","PeriodicalId":47349,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration","volume":"40 3","pages":"326-339"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La distance psychologique en sciences de gestion: Apports et limites de la théorie des niveaux de représentation\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Didi Alaoui\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cjas.1707\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article explains how construal level theory (CLT) expand knowledge of management sciences related to the effect of psychological distance on the organization's stakeholders. This work also highlights different limits of this framework and sets out a research agenda to overcome them. The main limits concern 1) a lack of precision regarding the modification of construal level as a function of psychological distance; 2) a prevalence of research on temporal and social distance to retranscribe the effects of a psychological distance theorized as a global concept; 3) numerous inconsistencies regarding multiple distances. Managerial implications are also suggested to handle the psychological distance of the stakeholders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration\",\"volume\":\"40 3\",\"pages\":\"326-339\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjas.1707\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjas.1707","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文解释了建构层次理论(CLT)如何扩展与心理距离对组织利益相关者影响相关的管理科学知识。这项工作还强调了这一框架的不同局限性,并制定了克服这些局限性的研究议程。主要的局限性涉及1)关于作为心理距离函数的解释水平的修改缺乏准确性;2) 普遍对时间和社会距离进行研究,以重新认识作为全球概念理论化的心理距离的影响;3) 关于多个距离的许多不一致。管理启示也被建议处理利益相关者的心理距离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
La distance psychologique en sciences de gestion: Apports et limites de la théorie des niveaux de représentation

This article explains how construal level theory (CLT) expand knowledge of management sciences related to the effect of psychological distance on the organization's stakeholders. This work also highlights different limits of this framework and sets out a research agenda to overcome them. The main limits concern 1) a lack of precision regarding the modification of construal level as a function of psychological distance; 2) a prevalence of research on temporal and social distance to retranscribe the effects of a psychological distance theorized as a global concept; 3) numerous inconsistencies regarding multiple distances. Managerial implications are also suggested to handle the psychological distance of the stakeholders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences (CJAS) is a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed, international quarterly that publishes manuscripts with a strong theoretical foundation. The journal welcomes literature reviews, quantitative and qualitative studies as well as conceptual pieces. CJAS is an ISI-listed journal that publishes papers in all key disciplines of business. CJAS is a particularly suitable home for manuscripts of a crossdisciplinary nature. All papers must state in an explicit and compelling way their unique contribution to advancing theory and/or practice in the administrative sciences.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information A person-centered perspective on employees' human resource management values and their implication for organizational commitment The content, evolution and determinants of COVID-19 disclosures in Canadian financial statements and MD&A documents: An impression management perspective La contribution des fournisseurs à la résilience de la chaîne logistique d'équipements de protection individuelle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1