“响应式天然气”倡议会保障天然气的未来吗?

Richard G. Smead
{"title":"“响应式天然气”倡议会保障天然气的未来吗?","authors":"Richard G. Smead","doi":"10.1002/gas.22374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Years ago, during the 2009–2014 time period, as hydraulic fracturing—the unfortunately named “fracking”—was the red-hot target of critics of the natural gas industry, it became very clear that it was critical to satisfy public concerns surrounding the safety and environmental impact of the fracking process. Variations in the behavior of the nation's huge population of natural gas producers rendered the industry vulnerable to its weakest members. In the best-run companies, usually major and large independent companies, there was an intense focus on clean and safe development, dealing with contaminated waste water as well as the sourcing of fracturing water, and in particular ensuring the absolute integrity of underground facilities to prevent the process from ever interacting with drinking water aquifers. Best practices also involved the overall management of the impact of site preparation, the operations themselves, including noise pollution and long-term site management. I argued frequently for the equivalent of a “Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval” for the most responsible producers to have a leg up in permitting, and a market (and price) advantage over others who could not show the same level of responsibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":100259,"journal":{"name":"Climate and Energy","volume":"40 4","pages":"27-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Will the “Responsibly Sourced Gas” Initiative Secure the Future of Natural Gas?\",\"authors\":\"Richard G. Smead\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/gas.22374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Years ago, during the 2009–2014 time period, as hydraulic fracturing—the unfortunately named “fracking”—was the red-hot target of critics of the natural gas industry, it became very clear that it was critical to satisfy public concerns surrounding the safety and environmental impact of the fracking process. Variations in the behavior of the nation's huge population of natural gas producers rendered the industry vulnerable to its weakest members. In the best-run companies, usually major and large independent companies, there was an intense focus on clean and safe development, dealing with contaminated waste water as well as the sourcing of fracturing water, and in particular ensuring the absolute integrity of underground facilities to prevent the process from ever interacting with drinking water aquifers. Best practices also involved the overall management of the impact of site preparation, the operations themselves, including noise pollution and long-term site management. I argued frequently for the equivalent of a “Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval” for the most responsible producers to have a leg up in permitting, and a market (and price) advantage over others who could not show the same level of responsibility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Climate and Energy\",\"volume\":\"40 4\",\"pages\":\"27-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Climate and Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gas.22374\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate and Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gas.22374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几年前,在2009-2014年期间,水力压裂——不幸被命名为“水力压裂”——成为天然气行业批评者的热门目标,很明显,满足公众对水力压裂过程的安全和环境影响的担忧至关重要。该国庞大的天然气生产商群体的行为变化使该行业容易受到最弱势成员的影响。在运营最好的公司,通常是大型和大型独立公司,都非常关注清洁和安全的开发,处理受污染的废水以及压裂水的来源,特别是确保地下设施的绝对完整性,以防止该过程与饮用水含水层相互作用。最佳做法还涉及对场地准备、作业本身的影响进行全面管理,包括噪音污染和长期场地管理。我经常主张,对于最负责任的生产商来说,这相当于一个“良好的管家审批印章”,让他们在许可方面占上风,并在市场(和价格)上优于其他无法表现出同等责任的生产企业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Will the “Responsibly Sourced Gas” Initiative Secure the Future of Natural Gas?

Years ago, during the 2009–2014 time period, as hydraulic fracturing—the unfortunately named “fracking”—was the red-hot target of critics of the natural gas industry, it became very clear that it was critical to satisfy public concerns surrounding the safety and environmental impact of the fracking process. Variations in the behavior of the nation's huge population of natural gas producers rendered the industry vulnerable to its weakest members. In the best-run companies, usually major and large independent companies, there was an intense focus on clean and safe development, dealing with contaminated waste water as well as the sourcing of fracturing water, and in particular ensuring the absolute integrity of underground facilities to prevent the process from ever interacting with drinking water aquifers. Best practices also involved the overall management of the impact of site preparation, the operations themselves, including noise pollution and long-term site management. I argued frequently for the equivalent of a “Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval” for the most responsible producers to have a leg up in permitting, and a market (and price) advantage over others who could not show the same level of responsibility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Community-Centered Grid Infrastructure Development The Value of International Engagement in Energy Education Assuring Energy Infrastructure Reliability and Resiliency Advanced Metering Infrastructure: Continued Evolution and Opportunities to Deliver Greater Value Can Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage Survive the Voluntary Financing Structure?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1