全球南方的“大脑发育不良”?挑战幼儿干预科学

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Ethos Pub Date : 2023-01-31 DOI:10.1111/etho.12379
Gabriel Scheidecker, Nandita Chaudhary, Heidi Keller, Francesca Mezzenzana, David F. Lancy
{"title":"全球南方的“大脑发育不良”?挑战幼儿干预科学","authors":"Gabriel Scheidecker,&nbsp;Nandita Chaudhary,&nbsp;Heidi Keller,&nbsp;Francesca Mezzenzana,&nbsp;David F. Lancy","doi":"10.1111/etho.12379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Global Early Childhood Development (ECD)—an applied field with the aim to improve the “brain structure and function” of future generations in the global South—has moved to the center of international development. Global ECD rests heavily on evidence claims about widespread cognitive, social, and emotional deficits in the global South and the benefits of changing parenting practices in order to optimize early childhood development. We challenge these claims on the grounds that the leading ECD literature excludes research from anthropology, cultural psychology, and related fields that could provide crucial insights about childrearing and children's development in the targeted communities. We encourage anthropologists and other scholars with ethnographic expertise on childhood to critically engage with global ECD. To facilitate such an endeavor, this article sketches the history, scientific claims, and interventions of global ECD, points out the critical potential of ethnographic research, and suggests strategies to make ethnography more relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":51532,"journal":{"name":"Ethos","volume":"51 1","pages":"3-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/etho.12379","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Poor brain development” in the global South? Challenging the science of early childhood interventions\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Scheidecker,&nbsp;Nandita Chaudhary,&nbsp;Heidi Keller,&nbsp;Francesca Mezzenzana,&nbsp;David F. Lancy\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/etho.12379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Global Early Childhood Development (ECD)—an applied field with the aim to improve the “brain structure and function” of future generations in the global South—has moved to the center of international development. Global ECD rests heavily on evidence claims about widespread cognitive, social, and emotional deficits in the global South and the benefits of changing parenting practices in order to optimize early childhood development. We challenge these claims on the grounds that the leading ECD literature excludes research from anthropology, cultural psychology, and related fields that could provide crucial insights about childrearing and children's development in the targeted communities. We encourage anthropologists and other scholars with ethnographic expertise on childhood to critically engage with global ECD. To facilitate such an endeavor, this article sketches the history, scientific claims, and interventions of global ECD, points out the critical potential of ethnographic research, and suggests strategies to make ethnography more relevant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethos\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"3-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/etho.12379\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/etho.12379\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethos","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/etho.12379","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

全球幼儿发展(ECD)是一个旨在改善全球南方子孙后代“大脑结构和功能”的应用领域,已成为国际发展的中心。全球幼儿发展在很大程度上依赖于关于全球南方普遍存在的认知、社会和情感缺陷的证据,以及改变育儿方式以优化幼儿发展的好处。我们对这些说法提出质疑,因为领先的幼儿发展文献排除了人类学、文化心理学和相关领域的研究,这些研究可以为目标社区的儿童养育和儿童发展提供重要见解。我们鼓励人类学家和其他具有儿童民族志专业知识的学者批判性地参与全球幼儿发展。为了促进这一努力,本文概述了全球ECD的历史、科学主张和干预措施,指出了民族志研究的关键潜力,并提出了使民族志更具相关性的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Poor brain development” in the global South? Challenging the science of early childhood interventions

Global Early Childhood Development (ECD)—an applied field with the aim to improve the “brain structure and function” of future generations in the global South—has moved to the center of international development. Global ECD rests heavily on evidence claims about widespread cognitive, social, and emotional deficits in the global South and the benefits of changing parenting practices in order to optimize early childhood development. We challenge these claims on the grounds that the leading ECD literature excludes research from anthropology, cultural psychology, and related fields that could provide crucial insights about childrearing and children's development in the targeted communities. We encourage anthropologists and other scholars with ethnographic expertise on childhood to critically engage with global ECD. To facilitate such an endeavor, this article sketches the history, scientific claims, and interventions of global ECD, points out the critical potential of ethnographic research, and suggests strategies to make ethnography more relevant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethos
Ethos Multiple-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Ethos is an interdisciplinary and international quarterly journal devoted to scholarly articles dealing with the interrelationships between the individual and the sociocultural milieu, between the psychological disciplines and the social disciplines. The journal publishes work from a wide spectrum of research perspectives. Recent issues, for example, include papers on religion and ritual, medical practice, child development, family relationships, interactional dynamics, history and subjectivity, feminist approaches, emotion, cognitive modeling and cultural belief systems. Methodologies range from analyses of language and discourse, to ethnographic and historical interpretations, to experimental treatments and cross-cultural comparisons.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information - TOC Gaming lounges in India afford socially productive gambling: The moral economy and foundations of play in Udaipur, Rajasthan Disclosure imperatives and women's subjectivities in an emergent culture of sexual trauma testimony Learning to walk in the forest Embodying the nuclear: The moral struggle of family care in postfallout Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1